Scott Mainwaring
Auteur de Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America (Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics)
A propos de l'auteur
Scott Mainwaring is the Eugene Conley Professor of Political Science and Director of the Kellogg Institute for International Studies at the University of Notre Dame. Timothy Scully is Professor of Political Science at the University of Notre Dame and a Fellow of the Kellogg Institute.
Œuvres de Scott Mainwaring
Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America (Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics) (1997) — Directeur de publication — 22 exemplaires
Issues in Democratic Consolidation: The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective (1992) 10 exemplaires
Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil (1999) 5 exemplaires
Christian democracy in Latin America : electoral competition and regime conflicts (2003) 4 exemplaires
Problems Confronting Contemporary Democracies: Essays in Honor of Alfred Stepan (2012) 2 exemplaires
Os movimentos populares de base e a luta pela democracia: Nova Iguaçu - Democratizando o Brasil 1 exemplaire
Étiqueté
Partage des connaissances
Membres
Critiques
Vous aimerez peut-être aussi
Auteurs associés
Statistiques
- Œuvres
- 16
- Membres
- 100
- Popularité
- #190,120
- Évaluation
- 3.8
- Critiques
- 1
- ISBN
- 47
- Langues
- 2
However, meaningless correlation coefficients between ”coded” variables are fortunately not a central part of this book, even though it contains a few tablefuls of them. The authors actually have a fairly interesting theory about democratic and dictatorial developments in Latin America in the twentieth century. The theory puts a lot of weight on the regime preferences of politically important actors and on international influences. Especially the authors' qualitative discussion of Argentinean politics in chapter 5 seems to support their argument. The authors also provide a nice critique of alternative explanations for democratic / dictatorial regime changes, such as modernization theory, class theory, and theories of mass political culture.
I sympathize with the author’s explanatory dilemma. They have a good historical argument on Latin American democratization and they seek to defend it through statistical evidence. But statistics turns into complete pseudo-science when you try to assign numerical values to abstractions, such as regime preferences of various Latin American political actors who were on the scene many decades ago. Due to the great unreliability of statistical "coding", the general parts of the argument are really not interesting. However, the same argument is made much better through citation and synthesis of written sources in the country-specific case studies of Argentina and El Salvador, and these sections were certainly worth reading.… (plus d'informations)