Robert A. Pape

Looks primarily at suicide terrorism from perspective of group strategy. Although he does touch on individual motivations somewhat, it is still through the prism of group dynamics rather than personal psychology. This is a weakness in the overall structure of the book's arguments, but there to the extent group-level analysis is your focus this has a lot to offer. The primary theme is that, contrary to the neocon's characterization of the post-9/11 actions, suicide terrorism is not about radical Islam, but primarily about US military insertions. Suicide terrorism is about nationalist striking at an invading occupier, not a religious war against an infidel. That makes perfect sense, and that it is supported by the actual data of who and where suicide terrorism occurs makes the presentation (which for some readers might strike as a tad academic) all the more convincing. This book covers data through 2003; he has a second book from 2010, Cutting the Fuse; I'll be curious to see how the new data modifies his conclusions. I might have given him more stars, but his concluding pages have him beating the gong for building Trump's wall, before Trump even thought it was a good idea.… (plus d'informations)

This is *the* foundational academic treatise on coercion through air power. It was published while Pape was faculty at the School of Advanced Air and Space Studies (SAASS) in Air University, teaching field grade officers in the Air Force, and has been taught as a subject there since. Other texts take on a similar topic, but with very few exceptions, are mostly focused on military topics. For example, John Warden--who was the director of SAASS while Pape was there--disagreed with Pape, and is roundly criticized in *Bombing to Win*, but is no longer taught in the strategic schools of SAASS, but is part of weapons school training, which is where the individual tactics are taught. Many airmen don't like the implication that strategic bombing doesn't work for coercion, but no one so far has been able to meaningfully refute the finding.

The text is long, but well worth the read for anyone interested in political outcomes in war.… (plus d'informations)