Jonathan Haidt
Auteur de The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion
A propos de l'auteur
Œuvres de Jonathan Haidt
The Coddling of the American Mind: How Good Intentions and Bad Ideas Are Setting Up a Generation for Failure (2018) 1,436 exemplaires
The Anxious Generation: How the Great Rewiring of Childhood Is Causing an Epidemic of Mental Illness (2024) 113 exemplaires
Flourishing: Positive Psychology and the Life Well-Lived (2002) — Directeur de publication — 58 exemplaires
Can't We All Disagree More Constructively?: from The Righteous Mind (Kindle Single) (A Vintage Short) (2016) 20 exemplaires
Jonathan Haidt Collection 3 Books Set (Happiness Hypothesis, The Righteous Mind, Coddling of the American Mind) (2019) 3 exemplaires
Intuitive ethics: how innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues.: An article from: Daedalus 1 exemplaire
Oeuvres associées
The Believing Primate: Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Reflections on the Origin of Religion (2009) — Contributeur — 38 exemplaires
Étiqueté
Partage des connaissances
- Date de naissance
- 1963-10-19
- Sexe
- male
- Nationalité
- USA
- Lieu de naissance
- Scarsdale, New York, USA
- Lieux de résidence
- Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Orissa, India - Études
- Yale University (BA) (1985)
University of Pennsylvania (PhD) (1992) - Professions
- Psychologist
Professor of Ethical Leadership - Organisations
- University of Virginia
Stern School of Business - Courte biographie
- Jonathan Haidt is the Thomas Cooley Professor of Ethical Leadership at New York University’s Stern School of Business. He received his B. A. from Yale University in 1985 and his Ph.D. from the University of Pennsylvania in 1992. He then did post-doctoral research at the University of Chicago and in Orissa, India. He was a professor at the University of Virginia from 1995 until 2011, when he joined the Stern School of Business. His research focuses on morality – its emotional foundations, cultural variations, and developmental course. He began his career studying the negative moral emotions, such as disgust, shame, and vengeance, but then moved on to the understudied positive moral emotions, such as admiration, awe, and moral elevation. This work got him involved with the field of positive psychology, in which he has been a leading researcher. He is the co-developer of Moral Foundations theory, and of the research site YourMorals.org. He uses his research to help people understand and respect the moral motives of their enemies (see CivilPolitics.org). He won three teaching awards from the University of Virginia, and one from the governor of Virginia. His three TED talks have been viewed more than 3 million times. (Those talks are on political psychology, on religion, and on the causes of America’s political polarization.) He was named a “top 100 global thinker” of 2012 by Foreign Policy magazine, and one of the 65 “World Thinkers of 2013″ by Prospect. He is the author of more than 90 academic articles and two books: The Happiness Hypothesis: Finding Modern Truth in Ancient Wisdom, and the New York Times bestseller The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion. For more information see JonathanHaidt.com.
http://righteousmind.com/wp-content/u...
Membres
Critiques
Listes
Prix et récompenses
Vous aimerez peut-être aussi
Auteurs associés
Statistiques
- Œuvres
- 13
- Aussi par
- 3
- Membres
- 6,959
- Popularité
- #3,516
- Évaluation
- 4.1
- Critiques
- 157
- ISBN
- 82
- Langues
- 12
- Favoris
- 3
The main arguments definitely provide some clarity and understanding of the PC/virtue signaling/SJW culture that is being embodied by the left especially on many college campuses. The authors do a good job of diving deep into specific instances to show motivations and another side of the story. Unfortunately, this is bogged down by their one sided political view of events in the US. They seem to be quite sympathetic to those actually promoting and causing violence and spend a lot of time explaining their actions, sometimes seeming to blame the victims but put no effort into doing the same for the other side. They conveniently leave specific facts out or unaddressed (Trump, Charlottesville) and include incorrect facts as supporting arguments (McCarthyism). However, this all aligns with the common narrative and does not seem to detract from the primary arguments of the book. That is what makes this book safe, in the sense that the authors use the word throughout. It goes right along with most of the current beliefs of the people they are discussing many of which are very divisive while suggesting that people stop being so divisive.… (plus d'informations)