"Why Rattlesnakes Bite And 250 Other Things You Should Know" is, according to the author, Valeri R. Helterbran, "rooted in the ... newspaper column" she writes for the Ligonier, PA newspaper. That column is titled, "Things Every Kid Should Know" which explains the elementary questions asked and answered throughout the book. Trivia enthusiasts probably won't find anything new or extraordinary, but readers will find plenty that targets a younger audience. In the preface she encourages her readers to be 'lifelong learners' - a wonderful aspiration!

Each chapter is divided by topic: Nature and Environment, Language, Holidays and Special Occasions, and Cuisine, just to name a few. She answers questions such as "What is a Swan Song?", "What Is a Blog?" (helpfully providing the pronunciation ("blawg")), and "What Is a Gerund?". While some questions do seem above the level of the intended reader (e.g.: "What Is a Mid-Life Crisis?" and "What Is a Shylock?") most will be of interest to readers of all ages. Included are photographs taken by and/or of family members and friends, as well as items probably found around her home (such as lunch bags, "What Is Hyperventilation?", and a pink flamingo brooch, "What Is a Rhinestone?"). The author also answers questions posed by friends and family as listed in the back. For many of the answers (but not in every chapter) she does provide an example of usage: for the question about the origin of the word 'windfall', she uses the word in three different sentences.

Helterbran's writing style is straight forward and to the point - she takes each question and answer seriously. A couple of nitpicky things: In the preface she begins, "Lifelong learning is a passion of mine", however by the second paragraph it switches to third person. Not a huge deal, but confusing on a basic level. Also, why list "Google.com" as a resource? Shouldn't this information be the result of a little bit more research than that?

This book is a fun read, albeit not especially new trivia territory. If you know young children, or, really anyone, who has an interest in learning more about all kinds of things, this book would be a good start. ( )

This book is a series of short (1-2 page) articles answering fairly specific questions (e.g., "What is Gout?" "Who Was Vince Lombardi?"), grouped into 7 chapters by theme (Nature, The Human Body, Language, Holidays, Humanities/Culture, Cuisine, and Geography). In its original incarnation, the book was a newspaper column, and it never really gets away from that--the answers are short and exactly to the point, with little room for long excursus on related topics (though this, to the author's credit, does occasionally happen). I didn't detect any factual errors in the book, but it was a rather lifeless affair overall.

When one compares it to the Uncle John's Bathroom Reader series (and let's be honest, that's where a book like this will be read), it falls a bit flat. The style is much more educational and straightforward (unsurprising, given the author's background in education), without the flair for humor or entertainment that the Bathroom Readers possess in spades; it also lacks the longer articles in the BR series (sometimes 3-4 pages long) that allow for more in-depth coverage of a topic.

The formatting, too, is a bit prosaic; the spacing of the text rows makes for relatively easy reading but it's dull to look at, and the rather mundane black and white photography inserted only adds to the amateurish feel of the whole thing. A redesign of the interior would probably go a long way toward making the book more appealing, as well as a tweaking of the style and depth of the articles.

It's not a bad book; it's just not a great one. Give it a read once you've burned through Uncle John and the like. ( )

Why Rattlesnakes Rattle is the follow-up book of random facts and explanations to Why Flamingos are Pink, also by Helterbran. This book, compared to other informational tidbit books I've read before, is geared towards a much younger audience, and as such, can be quite placating at times.

While several of the facts in the book were interesting, I had issue with some. My biggest complaint, however, was not the credibility of some of the resources, but rather the amateurish photographs interlaced between segments, some having hardly anything to do with the corresponding material. Ink illustrations would have worked much better, as would have professional black and white photographs. My second biggest complaint was with the copy editing in some cases (for example, "i.e." does not mean "for example"). My third biggest complaint was the slant towards Pennsylvania-based information, an obvious product of the author's employer at the time of this book's writing.

All in all, this book may be of some value to a younger reader, but may not be of interest to an older reader, used to "the rest of the story."

As for me, I'd prefer a book that actually answers the title's question ("Why do rattlesnakes rattle?"), which this book, oddly enough, doesn't. ( )

I like books of random facts, and this book does not disappoint. Each entry has a few paragraphs, providing more information than your standard trivia books of one-line “did you know” factoids. I was also pleasantly surprised to come across several things I hadn’t known and was actually curious to find out (it’s easy to find facts I didn’t know but most of them aren’t particularly interesting). Unlike many books of trivia, this one is just fine to read straight through, or you can turn to any random page. And with the thorough index, this book could even be relatively useful to keep around, more than just for entertainment. ( )

Usually, I rather enjoy books like this, these little collections of random interesting facts, but I have to say, this one kind of left me cold. I think it's mostly that it's too heavy on the "random" part and too light on the "interesting" part. There are certainly a few examples of the sort of thing I expect from such a book: little bits of information that make me go, "Huh, I didn't know that!" and feel ever-so-slightly richer for having corrected that lack. But a lot of it is stuff that really is just common knowledge (e.g."What is a lobbyist?", "What is a blog?"), or else so obscure and odd that I find it difficult to imagine hardly anyone actually asking the questions it somehow feels the need to answer (e.g. "Why do we swear by Alexander's beard?"). Some of the questions seem like surely they must have interesting stories behind them, to merit inclusion, but quickly disappoint. Like, why does Pittsburgh have an "h" on the end of it? Eh, well, it just does. For a while, the post office tried to change as part of an attempt to make place name spellings more regular, but people who lived there didn't like it, so they changed it back. Gosh, riveting stuff! Thanks for telling me that! And probably at least half of the entries just define or give the etymological histories of various words and phrases, some of which do have fairly colorful histories behind them and some of which, um, don't. Even the more interesting subjects are presented in a writing style that's not making any particular attempt to be engaging, though. And I'm afraid the pictures don't help, either. They're all small, muddy black-and-white photos, few of which illustrate anything useful. Many of them relate only very tangentially to things mentioned in passing, enough so that I suspect some of them are an attempt to inject a sense of playfulness that's missing in the text, but mostly they just make the whole thing look amateurish.

All of which probably sounds more relentlessly negative than I really want to be. Because, honestly, it's not bad. I did learn a few things from it, and it's probably a perfectly fine book to keep in the bathroom and browse through while you're taking care of business, if that's something you like to do. It's just that, if you want a collection of interesting facts you didn't know and probably should have, there are way better examples out there. ( )