Ce sujet est actuellement indiqué comme "en sommeil"—le dernier message date de plus de 90 jours. Vous pouvez le réveiller en postant une réponse.
2Sergeirocks
Very, and not really, both at the same time!
I certainly hadn't been convinced that it was McKnight (evidence was too circumstantial for my liking), but that nameplate-changing scene was very cleverly written: I did a double take when McKnight came to shake Painter's hand - I thought I'd missed something and had to reread the passage.
I certainly hadn't been convinced that it was McKnight (evidence was too circumstantial for my liking), but that nameplate-changing scene was very cleverly written: I did a double take when McKnight came to shake Painter's hand - I thought I'd missed something and had to reread the passage.
3Carol420
I knew the Minister wasn't McKnight but always thought that he was the traitor in DARPA. Good clever way to work that scene in Mr. Rollins.
5Olivermagnus
I had forgotten al about Tony the Tiger. I liked the way it was written too.
6Carol420
>5 Olivermagnus: Hard to believe as Tony looks so innocent:)
7Olivermagnus
If I were Tony I would sue Rollins for defamation.
8Carol420
>7 Olivermagnus: LOL! Kellogg's have good lawyers so it will be interesting.