Photo de l'auteur

Jack Sher (1913–1988)

Auteur de Shane [1953 film]

7+ oeuvres 251 utilisateurs 7 critiques

Œuvres de Jack Sher

Shane [1953 film] (1953) — Additional dialogue — 185 exemplaires
Move Over, Darling [1963 film] (1963) — Screenwriter — 26 exemplaires
The 3 Worlds of Gulliver [1960 film] (1960) — Directeur — 23 exemplaires
Paris Blues [1961 film] (1994) — Screenwriter — 11 exemplaires
The Cold Copanion 1 exemplaire

Oeuvres associées

Roundup: A Nebraska Reader (1957) — Contributeur — 21 exemplaires
Great Stories from the Saturday Evening Post (1947) — Contributeur — 7 exemplaires

Étiqueté

Partage des connaissances

Nom canonique
Sher, Jack
Nom légal
Sher, John Jacob
Date de naissance
1913-03-16
Date de décès
1988-08-23
Sexe
male
Nationalité
USA
Lieu de naissance
Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
Lieu du décès
Los Angeles, California, USA
Professions
film director
screenwriter

Membres

Critiques

2021 movie #144. 1961. Newman and Poitier are American jazz musicians living and working in Paris. Their world and friendship is disrupted by 2 American girls (Woodward and Diahann Carroll) on vacation. Louis Armstrong has a guest appearance. Great score by Duke Ellington.
 
Signalé
capewood | Aug 14, 2021 |
A wanderer helps homesteaders fight cattlemen.

2/4 (Indifferent).

It's 30 minutes too long, and often irritating.
½
 
Signalé
comfypants | 5 autres critiques | Oct 11, 2020 |
Does Shane die in the end?

Possible "spoilers" for those who have not seen the film, nor read the book

I read this book not too long ago (after watching the 1953 film).

The film's ending imagery suggests that the character "Shane" dies in the end of the film. The final few seconds of the film show the title character slumped in his saddle, about to fall off, as he rides through a cemetery towards a bright light in an otherwise dark, midnight sky . The night is almost pitch-dark, there is no moon, just this heavenly-bright stretch of sky.

Shane is riding directly towards this light, indicating his spirit is about to enter heaven.

Final image of the film (look quickly, it is only a second or two) shows Shane and his horse *descending* into the ground, between two of the tombstones in the cemetery, until both are lost from view.

Shane's mortal body is being returned to the earth.

Pretty unmistakable what is happening here, for those who care to look carefully and think about it a bit.

The book ends differently.

In the book, we know from Bob's description that Shane has been shot in the torso, as he rides away into the dark, soon lost from view. The book doesn't end there, though, but goes on to state that when Bob's father, Joe, finds out that Shane is still alive after the gunfight, he (Joe) is surprised and happy at this news.

And yet. . . and yet. . .

Although Joe, Bob's father, having been informed that Shane has been critically injured in the gunfight - most likely fatally - Joe never bothers to go out to look for Shane, not to help him, not even to, perhaps, find his body to bury him. A man in those days - any days, really - with a gunshot to the torso would not be able to ride a horse very far at all.

Joe does not go to find Shane, even though Shane, by his selfless act, has saved Joe, Joe's family, Joe's homestead and likely the entire homesteader community at large. Whew!

The whole of the story is extremely well written, but this last bit to me seems illogical, and at odds with the previous body of the work. True, Joe and Shane have just engaged in fisticuffs, but considering the kind of man Joe has been portrayed as throughout the book, I don't think this would have stopped him from going to search for his friend Shane.

It seems to me like a betrayal - of both Shane and of Bob - that he does not do so.

This has been bothering me quite a bit, and I would be very interested to know how other readers look at how the book ends.¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬-
… (plus d'informations)
 
Signalé
H.Park | 5 autres critiques | Apr 19, 2019 |
Does Shane die in the end?

May be spoilers below for those who have not seen the film or read the book

I read this book not too long ago (after watching the 1953 film).

The film's ending imagery suggests that the character "Shane" dies in the end of the film. The final few seconds of the film show the title character slumped in his saddle, about to fall off, as he rides through a cemetery towards a bright light in an otherwise dark, midnight sky . The night is almost pitch-dark, there is no moon, just this heavenly-bright stretch of sky.

Shane is riding directly towards this light, indicating his spirit is about to enter heaven.

Final image of the film (look quickly, it is only a second or two) shows Shane and his horse *descending* into the ground, between two of the tombstones in the cemetery, until both are lost from view.

Shane's mortal body is being returned to the earth.

Pretty unmistakable what is happening here, for those who care to look carefully and think about it a bit.

The book ends differently.

In the book, we know from Bob's description that Shane has been shot in the torso, as he rides away into the dark, soon lost from view. The book doesn't end there, though, but goes on to state that when Bob's father, Joe, finds out that Shane is still alive after the gunfight, he (Joe) is surprised and happy at this news.

And yet. . . and yet. . .

Although Joe, Bob's father, having been informed that Shane has been critically injured in the gunfight - most likely fatally - Joe never bothers to go out to look for Shane, not to help him, not even to, perhaps, find his body to bury him. A man in those days - any days, really - with a gunshot to the torso would not be able to ride a horse very far at all.

Joe does not go to find Shane, even though Shane, by his selfless act, has saved Joe, Joe's family, Joe's homestead and likely the entire homesteader community at large. Whew!

The whole of the story is extremely well written, but this last bit to me seems illogical, and at odds with the previous body of the work. True, Joe and Shane have just engaged in fisticuffs, but considering the kind of man Joe has been portrayed as throughout the book, I don't think this would have stopped him from going to search for his friend Shane.

It seems to me like a betrayal - of both Shane and of Bob - that he does not do so.

This has been bothering me quite a bit, and I would be very interested to know how other readers look at how the book ends.
… (plus d'informations)
 
Signalé
H.Park | 5 autres critiques | Apr 19, 2019 |

Listes

Prix et récompenses

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi

Auteurs associés

Statistiques

Œuvres
7
Aussi par
3
Membres
251
Popularité
#91,086
Évaluation
3.9
Critiques
7
ISBN
19
Langues
2

Tableaux et graphiques