Whitney J. Oates (1904–1973)
Auteur de Seven Famous Greek Plays
A propos de l'auteur
Œuvres de Whitney J. Oates
The Stoic and Epicurean philosophers; the complete extant writings of Epicurus, Epictetus, Lucretius, Marcus Aurelius (1940) — Directeur de publication — 208 exemplaires
Complete Greek Drama: All the Extant Tragedies of Aeschylus, Sophocles and Euripides, and the Comedies of Aristophanes… (1938) — Directeur de publication — 157 exemplaires
Aristotle and the problem of value 7 exemplaires
From Sophocles to Picasso: the present-day vitality of the classical tradition, (1972) 2 exemplaires
Gugu-Yalanji and Wik-Munkan language studies 2 exemplaires
Basic Writings of Saint Augustine- V. 2 1 exemplaire
Oeuvres associées
Classical studies presented to Edward Capps on his seventieth birthday (1936) — Contributeur — 2 exemplaires
Étiqueté
Partage des connaissances
- Nom canonique
- Oates, Whitney J.
- Nom légal
- Oates, Whitney Jennings
- Date de naissance
- 1904-03-26
- Date de décès
- 1973-10-14
- Sexe
- male
- Nationalité
- USA
- Lieu de naissance
- Evanston, Illinois, USA
- Lieu du décès
- Sarasota, Florida, USA
- Lieux de résidence
- Evanston, Illinois, USA
Princeton, New Jersey, USA - Études
- Princeton University (PhD|1931)
Princeton University (AB|1926) - Professions
- professor
classical philologist - Organisations
- Princeton University
US Marine Corps (WWII) - Courte biographie
- Known as Mike to his colleagues at Princeton. Went to Princeton from the Evanston Township High School in Illinois as a member of the class of 1925. He graduated summa cum laude in classics, earning his A.M. in 1927 and his Ph.D in 1931. Chairman of the classics department for sixteen years. Published extensively in his special fields of interest, Greek drama and philosophy. In the 1930s he was a principal organizer, and from 1945 to 1959 was chairman, of the Special Program for the Humanities. During World War II, Oates served with the Marines in the Southwest Pacific. He returned to Princeton in 1945 and conceived and found the money for a plan to attract returning servicemen into college teaching, founding a program that became the National Woodrow Wilson Fellowship Program.
In 1953 he helped establish the Council of Humanities and was chairman until his retirement from the faculty in 1970.
Membres
Critiques
The Stoic and Epicurean Philosophers: The Complete… par Whitney J. Oates
Epicureans get four out five while the stoics get one out of five.
Generously, 3*** – 2½** might be more appropriate. Probably an excellent book in its day (1938), but these translations are terribly dated.
so this really isn't my thing, in general. the timing was good to read it, though, as i'd been primed after reading some historical fiction about rome, even though that was 500 years after most of these plays were written/produced. still, it puts you in the right frame of mind for the kind of violence that seems to have been prevalent then.
i'd read at least 2 and as many as 4 of these before, but didn't really remember much of them; already knowing the story doesn't detract any as you're kind of supposed to know the story going in anyway. to that end, each of the plays is introduced with a short explanation, giving the context to the reader. there is also a glossary at the end, so you can look up the many references to people and such throughout. personally, i found the introductions helpful, but would have much preferred references on the side or at the bottom of the pages to help explain the rest of the information that is found in the glossary. when i used the glossary, which wasn't too much, i didn't find it helpful. i don't want to know who some historical/mythological reference is but why it is important; i need more context. so i'm sure there was a lot that i missed. especially as i found myself mostly skimming as i went along.
ok, so i most enjoyed both of sophocles' plays, oedipus the king and antigone, at least one of which were rereads for me. i found these to be the easiest to follow without trouble at all, and the flow seemed better to me in them. also i just like the subject matter better (personal struggle). i also liked euripides' alcestis but didn't much care for his medea, although both were also easy to understand and follow. i wasn't into aeschylus' plays at all (prometheus bound and agamemnon) and found them hard to get through without a better background in the history. aristophanes' the frogs seemed a trifle that i didn't see much point to, although there were parts that were a little amusing.… (plus d'informations)
i'd read at least 2 and as many as 4 of these before, but didn't really remember much of them; already knowing the story doesn't detract any as you're kind of supposed to know the story going in anyway. to that end, each of the plays is introduced with a short explanation, giving the context to the reader. there is also a glossary at the end, so you can look up the many references to people and such throughout. personally, i found the introductions helpful, but would have much preferred references on the side or at the bottom of the pages to help explain the rest of the information that is found in the glossary. when i used the glossary, which wasn't too much, i didn't find it helpful. i don't want to know who some historical/mythological reference is but why it is important; i need more context. so i'm sure there was a lot that i missed. especially as i found myself mostly skimming as i went along.
ok, so i most enjoyed both of sophocles' plays, oedipus the king and antigone, at least one of which were rereads for me. i found these to be the easiest to follow without trouble at all, and the flow seemed better to me in them. also i just like the subject matter better (personal struggle). i also liked euripides' alcestis but didn't much care for his medea, although both were also easy to understand and follow. i wasn't into aeschylus' plays at all (prometheus bound and agamemnon) and found them hard to get through without a better background in the history. aristophanes' the frogs seemed a trifle that i didn't see much point to, although there were parts that were a little amusing.… (plus d'informations)
My favorite translation. Great notes, very funny.
Listes
Vous aimerez peut-être aussi
Auteurs associés
Statistiques
- Œuvres
- 18
- Aussi par
- 1
- Membres
- 1,021
- Popularité
- #25,226
- Évaluation
- 4.0
- Critiques
- 7
- ISBN
- 14
- Favoris
- 1