Jack FineganCritiques

Not the kind of book one reads from cover-to-cover, as I discovered when I tried. But useful to have on the shelf and to consult.

An introduction to the New Testament Apocrypha, and to some of the areas through which they were transmitted, namely, Jewish, Egyptian, and Gnostic Christianity, together with the earlier Gospel-type records in the Apocrypha, in Greek and Latin texts, translations, and explanation.

This is the most detailed resource available on issues relating to time and the Bible.

Book can have multiple personality disorder just as much as people.

I'm honestly not sure if this book wants to be primarily about textual criticism (that is, determining the original text of the New Testament), or about paleography (that is, the study of ancient writing and what it tells us about manuscripts), or about the evolution of text-types within the New Testament tradition.

There are major sections on each of these topics. The first quarter of the book is mostly about how ancient manuscripts were made -- paleography. The next quarter is about textual criticism. Then we start seeing actual manuscript photos -- but they're organized into "sequences" illustrating the (alleged) history of text-types. Then we get "conclusions" and "the future task" to try to bind it all together.

The best part of the book is probably the manuscript photos. It would be nicer if they were in color, but the book is from the 1970s.... There is useful analysis of each manuscript page shown, with a transcription into modern Greek lettering and information about abbreviations and such. This will be a genuine help to the beginner trying to learn Greek handwriting (especially minuscule handwriting, which is the hardest to read). But to really learn this topic requires more samples. And the other sections are even less complete.

Plus the author is really, really wordy. Many of his sentences are longer than a better writer's paragraphs.

On the whole, I would have to consider this more a first taste than a genuine introduction. It's good to have all those samples and analysis, but you'll need far, far more to learn to be either a paleographer or a textual critic.

I was reading the 1959 edition of this book, which is extremely dated. When I realized the author was assuming the Bible was a reliable historical source, I gave up. The chapters on Sumer and Egypt provide a good overview of what was known about these civilizations at the time.

About a Jew from the time of the fall of Jerusaem who travels meast and meets Zoroaster, Mahavira, Buddha, Lao Tzu, Confucius etc. Suspiciously similar to the plot of Vidal's later work Creation except Vidal used a Persian instead of a Jew.
Finegan was a professor at Pacific School of Religion and probably new more of what he was talking about than Vidal.
It is remarkable so many great teacers lived at much the same time, so just possibly the plot similarity is a coincidence.

Fairly straightforward historical fiction version of the life of Mark, The "taw" is what is usually spell tau (T shaped cross).

A wonderful, must-have reference for anyone who enjoys mucking around in the morass of biblical chronology and history.½