the book was wonderful according to its adds in the book. however to was quite stupid. ( )

The Ice People is a bleak vision of a near-future in which civilisation breaks down in the face of rapid climate change, its focus strictly on gender politics and disaffected youth. Although the cover hints tantalisingly at a broad canvas of environmental politics and African supremacy, The Ice People is the story of one man (Saul), depicting the dissolution of his family as a microcosm of the disintegration of British society.

Every attempt I have made to write a brief review of this novel has turned into an essay - it is dense, compelling, packed with throwaway references and visions of its time and technologies, thought-provoking and likely to induce arguments. It is worth a read for all these reasons and a top pick for a book club - but not exactly enjoyable (as someone else has commented, the most sympathetic character is a feathered menial robot with strictly limited programming (no AI here!) who may or may not have eaten her owner's cat). ( )

Utterly compelling story with unusual scope. Stretches itself through time & landscape like a nimble feline. ( )

Set in the future, our story is narrated by Saul, a older man around 60 or so, living in UK in the middle of an "ice age". Society where he is has deteriorated into primitive conditions with ragged bands of youngish people living certainly without literature, and written language. Saul is valuable to him because he can tell them stories. (Saul here reminds me a little of Margaret Atwood's "Snowman" in Oryx and Crake). Something is about to happen and Saul is desperate to tell his story, to write it down.

He takes us back to his days as a young man, when the UK was suffering from relentless hot days, and the idea of an ice age descending upon them quickly was laughable. Fertility is low and diseases (rampant HIV) still prevalent. Men and women prefer to be with their own kind, and fashion is mostly androgynous. In the absence of children, robots were developed, first for domestic uses (feathered robots, no less!), eventually they were adapted for other uses. Saul is in love with Sarah, who he met at age 25. At first they are everything to each other. They decide to go through an arduous process to have a child and eventually they succeed. Everything becomes increasingly more complicated. This is his—no, their—story.

Maggie Gee is a great storyteller. She captures your attention almost immediately and carries you through the book effortlessly. I expected a book called "The Ice People" and featuring a world first overly hot, then overly cold, to be about climate change, and although that is there as backdrop, this book is really about gender relations. Not just about this one couple but about how we define ourselves as "men" or "women" and what our society assigns to our gender roles. Take the the biology, the sex, away and do we really need each other? And how do these things affect children? In the book, what first starts as the sexes preferring the company of their own sex ("segged", it's called. For 'segregation'), becomes more militant.

This is a thoughtful, thought-provoking book, an exploration of ideas around gender, gender roles, and gender relations without a definitive verdict (maybe not the word I want here), which is to say that the story continues and ends, but we have not been told what exactly to think about these things. However, as Saul tells the story, it is his fierce love for Sarah and their son Luke that is the real story. He's finished now, the wild boys are coming for him... ( )

I believe I originally put this book on my TBR list when I was looking for books dealing with climate change in some ways. While climate change (sliding into a new ice age) plays a role in the novel's plot, it is mostly in the background, and the focus is on social changes and results of gender politics that have led to large-scale segregation of men from women. Now I realise this book was published in the late 1990s, with the protagonist supposedly born in 2005, and things have changed since then, but I just couldn't see how things would have gone into that direction with gender politics for the generation that my children (if I had any) would belong--I hesitate to call it naive, but certainly unlikely and poorly thought out. Of course things, don't always develop in well-thought-out ways, but still. And the same applies for the little we saw about politics of race and ethnicity.

I found the protagonist insufferably whingey so he annoyed me half the time.

This was my choice for book group, so I'm looking forward to interesting discussion. ( )