Photo de l'auteur

Keith Windschuttle

Auteur de The Killing of History

21+ oeuvres 428 utilisateurs 6 critiques

A propos de l'auteur

Keith Windschuttle has been a lecturer in history, social policy, and media studies at the University of New South Wales and other Australian academic institutions

Comprend les noms: Keight Windschuttle

Œuvres de Keith Windschuttle

The Killing of History (1996) 305 exemplaires
The White Australia Policy (2004) 8 exemplaires
The Howard Era (2009) 2 exemplaires
The Persecution of George Pell (2020) 1 exemplaire

Oeuvres associées

Étiqueté

Partage des connaissances

Membres

Critiques

Gosh. Golly gee whiz. Hot diggity dog. Bowl me over with a feather. And other such phrases.

Windschuttle is a famous (notorious?) revisionist historian in Australia well known for his biases, but I opened this book with the genuine desire to know more about this issue. I came away bleary-eyed, bewildered, and chortling like a Catholic schoolboy at a PG-rated film.

There are only two arguments in this book, and they’re both fantastic. I use that word in its literal sense.

The first argument is from the “scientists have made up climate change for nebulous and still-unrevealed reasons!” school of thought. Apparently, countless Australian historians and archaeologists have just invented much of the history of colonial Australia. Did you know that my Anglo ancestors didn’t actually have racist views? They threw pancake parties for Aboriginals and bought them all ponies! They were so kind.

Healthy scepticism is useful, and revisiting sources from scratch rather than relying on received wisdom is grand. Here, however, KW takes his scepticism way waaaay past the healthy yardline. Ironically, for someone who accuses almost all of his colleagues of acting with obvious bias and deceptive intent, he refuses to acknowledge that he might be less than impartial. Is Windschuttle German for “confirmation bias”, by any chance?

And why, you may ask, are historians on this crusade? Well, friend, that’s the second argument of the book! You see, the plan from Australian aboriginals is to secretly take over the country. Even better, they’re using us – that is, non-aboriginal Australians – to do it! That’s right! All of this messy reconciliation business is just a ploy to get an aboriginal state taking up 60% of the continent. Next up: all of it. ALL OF IT.
This is elaborate, B grade movie, “George W Bush flew the planes into the towers” bullshit. It’s right up there with the gays are planning to Pied Piper all of our children and the Jews are tracking my grandma’s bank account.

This book will no doubt find its audience, and bring comfort to Australia’s most nervous patriots. At the same time, please don’t tell my indigenous friends about it because they will be upset that they weren’t invited to be part of the conspiracy. Unfair, Secret Leaders of the Aboriginal Junta! My friends are cool! Let them play with you!

Hmm. I seem to have wandered off the point. Which is, at least, one thing I can’t accuse Mr Windschuttle of doing. His performance is a consistent thing of absurdist beauty, even if one rather suspects the performer isn’t in on the joke.
All this for only $44.95 plus postage? What a steal.

… (plus d'informations)
 
Signalé
therebelprince | 1 autre critique | Apr 21, 2024 |
Post-Modernism is once again the culprit in the destruction of standards as they apply to the study and writing of history. Highly critical of the whole enterprise of literary theory and how its incoherence has caused irreparable damage to western culture.
 
Signalé
georgee53 | 3 autres critiques | May 17, 2018 |
Gives a very clear explanation of all the post-modern theories of culture and history, and explains why their influence on historians has effectively destroyed objective historical research and writing.
Although written 20 years ago, the text is not dated; if anything, it is even more applicable.
Describes semiotics, structuralism, ethnohistory, poststructuralism, anti-humanism, post-history, postmodernism, relativism, hermeneutics, induction.
For those not inclined to wade through the weeds, chapter 7 is the most important.
Note to self: page 144 relates to a post on Neoneocon. com of 2017-11-06.
… (plus d'informations)
½
 
Signalé
librisissimo | 3 autres critiques | Dec 11, 2017 |
There are many excesses and absurdities in postmodern theory, as there are in any other academic movement or endeavor. However, Windshuttle in this book merely shows himself either disingenuous or incapable of reading. If you were to follow his prescriptions to their logical extent, no historian's work would ever be acceptable.
1 voter
Signalé
sotirfan | 3 autres critiques | Apr 23, 2010 |

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi

Auteurs associés

Statistiques

Œuvres
21
Aussi par
5
Membres
428
Popularité
#57,056
Évaluation
½ 3.6
Critiques
6
ISBN
15

Tableaux et graphiques