Photo de l'auteur

Pour les autres auteurs qui s'appellent George Watson, voyez la page de désambigüisation.

25+ oeuvres 225 utilisateurs 2 critiques

A propos de l'auteur

George Watson is a Fellow of St. John's College, Cambridge, author of The Literary Critics and general editor of the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature. He is author of The Lost Literature of Socialism (1998, 2nd edition 2010); Never Ones For Theory? England and the War of Ideas afficher plus (2001); Take Back the Past: Myths of the Twentieth Century (2007); and The Story of the Novel (2008). afficher moins
Crédit image: Times Higher Education

Œuvres de George Watson

The concise Cambridge bibliography of English literature, 600-1950 (1958) — Directeur de publication — 32 exemplaires
The lost literature of socialism (1998) 14 exemplaires
The New Cambridge bibliography of English literature (1987) — Directeur de publication — 10 exemplaires
Literary English since Shakespeare (1970) — Directeur de publication — 10 exemplaires
The study of literature (1969) 8 exemplaires
The story of the novel (1979) 4 exemplaires
Coleridge the poet (2016) 4 exemplaires

Oeuvres associées

Biographia Literaria (1907) — Directeur de publication, quelques éditions392 exemplaires
Edmund Burke: Appraisals and Applications (1990) — Contributeur — 7 exemplaires

Étiqueté

Partage des connaissances

Membres

Critiques

 
Signalé
Impossibilist | Oct 21, 2017 |
I have really enjoyed this book. There are a sufficiency of plums ('They do not contribute: they interrupt' ... 'dogmatism based on the uncertainty of its dogmas') and, what matters much more, the solid cake in between is nutritious. I am glad [the author doesn't] over-rate Dryden. [He] diagnose[s] Lamb exactly right. And [his] severities about Arnold and Leavis are just, besides being much better bred than A's own superciliousness or L's yahoo howls.

I don't think Wordsworth really held the theory of metre [he is blamed] for on p. 116. The sentence about 'superadding' the 'charm' of verse is introduced by the words 'Now supposing for a moment'. i.e. even if metre were merely something added (like jam on bread and butter) why should I not use it? He supposes, positionis causa, a concession he refuses actually to make. His real theory of metre (to my mind the best, perhaps the only valuable, part of the Preface) follows in the next two paragraphs and begins appropriately with the word 'But' ('But various causes...')

On p. 202 where it appears...as if W.P. Ker had been a Christian? Was he? I never heard of, nor remotely suspected, it. Even I, by the way, wrote nearly the whole of the Allegory book while I was still an agnostic.

There is one passage (p. 29) that completely defeated me. What is snobbish about finding Laodamia [one of Wordsworth's poems] 'not wholly free' from artificiality? ...I don't mean that I disagree... (which is what people sometimes mean, when they say they don't understand). I mean that I am baffled...

But it's a good book.
- from a 12 May 1962 letter to the author, in The collected letters of C.S. Lewis, volume III
… (plus d'informations)
 
Signalé
C.S._Lewis | Mar 30, 2009 |

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi

Auteurs associés

Statistiques

Œuvres
25
Aussi par
2
Membres
225
Popularité
#99,815
Évaluation
3.9
Critiques
2
ISBN
73
Langues
1

Tableaux et graphiques