Photo de l'auteur

Jonathan Z. Smith (1938–2017)

Auteur de Imagining Religion: From Babylon to Jonestown

11+ oeuvres 479 utilisateurs 4 critiques

A propos de l'auteur

Jonathan Z. Smith is perhaps the leading theorist working in the study of religions today; he is also a scholar who specializes in Hellenistic and late Antique religions. Trained at Yale University, where he wrote a thesis examining the methods employed in James G. Frazer's mammoth classic, The afficher plus Golden Bough, Smith has been particularly interested in using the ideas and methods of sociology and anthropology to study religions. Through unrelenting criticism and detailed historical investigations, he has called into question many of the conclusions that an older generation of scholars had reached. His acumen has been directed particularly at the work of Mircea Eliade, who was for years Smith's colleague at the University of Chicago. His recent book, Drudgery Divine, aims to expose the sectarian purposes that led Protestant historians to isolate "primitive Christianity" from its contexts in ancient religions, an expose that Smith's own background in Judaism makes him ideally suited to carry out. As a theorist, Smith emphasizes the active role of intellection in all scholarly enterprises. He insists that the aim of religious studies is distinct from that of religions ("map is not territory"), that "religion" is a category "imagined" by Western scholars to accomplish certain academic purposes, and that theoretical questions and purposes should explicitly guide all investigations. For example, Smith states that when scholars compare religions, their immediate concern should not be with finding similarities that pervade a large body of data (cp. Eliade), nor should it be to determine who borrowed what from whom (historical diffusion). Instead, the purpose of comparison is to identify individual differences that assume significance because they elucidate specific theoretical issues. Smith's distinction between locative religions---religions that pertain to specific places---and utopian ones---religions that have broken their bonds with place---is especially helpful in considering the history of religions in the Hellenistic and late Antique periods. Smith's work is itself too recent to have been the subject of a scholarly monograph, but readers will find Smith's influence extending widely through the study of ancient religions. Those who want critical assessments may wish to consult book review indexes. (Bowker Author Biography) afficher moins
Crédit image: University of Chicago

Séries

Œuvres de Jonathan Z. Smith

Oeuvres associées

Prayer, Magic, and the Stars in the Ancient and Late Antique World (2003) — Contributeur — 60 exemplaires
Ancient Magic and Ritual Power (1995) — Contributeur — 50 exemplaires
Magic and Ritual in the Ancient World (2002) — Contributeur — 32 exemplaires
Roman Religion (Edinburgh Readings on the Ancient World) (2003) — Contributeur — 9 exemplaires

Étiqueté

Partage des connaissances

Membres

Critiques

There was too much dense academia for me. Dry and inaccessible.
 
Signalé
2wonderY | 2 autres critiques | Dec 30, 2015 |
Smith stresses the importance of place—in particular, constructed ritual environments—to a proper understanding of the ways in which "empty" actions become rituals. He structures his argument around the territories of the Tjilpa aborigines in Australia and two sites in Jerusalem—the temple envisioned by Ezekiel and the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. The first of these locales—the focus of one of the more important contemporary theories of religious ritual—allows Smith to raise questions concerning the enterprise of comparison. His close examination of Eliade's influential interpretation of the Tjilpa tradition leads to a powerful critique of the approach to religion, myth, and ritual that begins with cosmology and the category of "The Sacred."… (plus d'informations)
1 voter
Signalé
gmicksmith | 2 autres critiques | Jun 25, 2013 |
This fairly slim book consists of five lecture texts:

* "On the Origin of Origins" begins the discussion, using the Jefferson-Adams correspondence on religious topics as a point of departure. It also orients around the writings of Priestly and Dupuis, and pinpoints the question of Christian origins in "Protestant anti-Catholic apologetics."

* "On Comparison" is a largely methodological piece, that incisively outlines the gambits of uniqueness and genealogy that have served the agendas of Protestant polemic and Christian supremacism in previous work on the topic.

* "On Comparing Words" discusses the philological arguments to date, and their subservience to theological efforts. Quite happily for me, Smith chose to use the term mysterion for illustrative purposes throughout this section. Among other things, I learned about the ancient Greek pun attributed by Athenaios to Dionysos Tyrannos: mysterion = mus terein, "mouseholes!" (p. 56 n)

* "On Comparing Stories" has a quick survey of "pagan Christs" literature, before focusing in on Frazer's 'dying and rising' god motif, and its application to Christianity in the work of Pfleiderer; then a discussion of the problems of data for historically-oriented comparisons.

* "On Comparing Settings" applies all of the foregoing to the question of comparing early Christianities (note the significant plural!) to other religions of antiquity, also bringing in Smith's locative/utopian distinction. Smith's confessed appreciation for and dependence on the Christian origins work of Burton Mack is clearest in this section.

Smith writes, "The Protestant hegemony over the enterprise of comparing the religions of Late Antiquity and early Christianities has been an affair of mythic conception and ritual practice from the outset." Aleister Crowley's Gospel According to St. Bernard Shaw (a.k.a. Jesus sub figura 888) still deserves that same valuation, despite its opposition to the Protestant hegemony, as he was fighting fire with fire. It was not "a thorough revaluation of the purposes of comparison" in service to "the scholarly imagination of religion," as Smith would prefer. But Crowley's tack adds an additional dimension to the history of the enterprise, and for those who wish to soldier on in the mythic and ritual battlefields, Smith's book is a stone that will sharpen any sword that can hold the edge.
… (plus d'informations)
1 voter
Signalé
paradoxosalpha | Jun 10, 2009 |
The "place" of the title and of Smith's theory is not merely location, but also the "place" in sequence and the "place" in rank or value. He theorizes ritual as a "mode of paying attention," which creates and affirms distinctions and differences, rather than contents or essences. He thus draws comparisons between the "places" established by Tjilpa dreamtime narratives, ancient near eastern temple architecture, the system of the Mishnah, and the Christian liturgical year.

As always, Smith is rigorous and thorough in his treatment of his illustrative cases, and he applies a critical sensibility to the history of the scholarship of religion. Not only does he take Eliade to task over the universality of the "sacred axis," he dissects and addresses the abiding legacy of Protestant anti-Catholic polemics underlying the conception of "ritual" in academic discourse.… (plus d'informations)
2 voter
Signalé
paradoxosalpha | 2 autres critiques | Aug 5, 2008 |

Prix et récompenses

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi

Auteurs associés

Statistiques

Œuvres
11
Aussi par
6
Membres
479
Popularité
#51,492
Évaluation
4.0
Critiques
4
ISBN
15

Tableaux et graphiques