Photo de l'auteur
3 oeuvres 391 utilisateurs 9 critiques

A propos de l'auteur

Eric Rutkow, a graduate of Yale University and Harvard Law School, has worked as a lawyer on environmental issues. He splits his time between New York and New Haven, Connecticut, where he is pursuing a doctorate in American history at Yale.American Canopy is his first book.
Crédit image: R.J. Julia

Œuvres de Eric Rutkow

Étiqueté

Partage des connaissances

Sexe
male

Membres

Critiques

An interesting angle from which to approach American history: trees, forests, the lumber industry, and ultimately the ecology movement. Well written and well researched. (Of necessity, near the end it sort of loses focus on American trees and forests because our interaction with these things now occurs on a global stage due to international trade in wood products.)
 
Signalé
Treebeard_404 | 6 autres critiques | Jan 23, 2024 |
This is a nonfiction book about how the abundance of trees in the U.S. intersected with development of our nation. An interesting topic and one that worked very well for large sections of the book and less well in others. I really enjoyed the first half of this book. Rutkow writes about how valued trees were to European settlers. They were used for housing, fencing, furniture, etc. But also for ship building - especially exciting was the abundance of very tall straight trees that could be used for masts. He talks about trees used for food (apple, orange, chestnut, etc.) He moves into talking about lumber mills and paper mills and the progression of mindset from "the trees are there for us to use in whatever way we need", to conservation, to environmentalism. I also was interested in the section about the American Chestnut and the Elm tree that were decimated by introduced fungi.

As you can see, he casts a wide net and covers a lot of topics. I preferred those that really kept trees as the focus. Some of the chapters were too much about politics. And it was also sad, though not a new idea, to delve in to all the ways we've ruined our forests. The long section on paper mills lost my interest.

Overall, I am glad I read this book, but it wasn't quite as good as I wanted it to be. Or maybe I just wanted a different focus than the author chose. Either way, it's a soft recommendation from me.
… (plus d'informations)
1 voter
Signalé
japaul22 | 6 autres critiques | Apr 1, 2023 |
Three books in one, this, and at least one of them is on topic. The first and longest book concerns itself with nineteenth-century efforts to build a Pan-American railroad. Although this topic has a reasonable claim to be useful backstory to a book which purports to be about the Pan-American Highway, it deserves perhaps twenty-five pages instead of its bloated, tangent-ridden course which includes everything from a mini-history of Trans-Mississippi railroading to chapter-and-verse on Central American and Mexican politics of the period. The second section, on the United States' Good Roads Movement, is even less relevant and should have been omitted entirely. Finally, 200 pages in, we get to the Pan-American Highway, and the book is good thereafter. I have no complaints about the author's scholarship or writing style (well, except that why does he keep referring to "Panama and Central America--which part of East Africa does he think Panama's in, anyway?). Getting all these excrescences out of the book would have given him space to write about the course of the highway in South America, about which he says next to nothing. This book could have been a 200-page foccaccia oizza instead of a 360-page lump of unleavened dough.… (plus d'informations)
½
 
Signalé
Big_Bang_Gorilla | 1 autre critique | Jan 19, 2022 |
During the time I spent reading this book, I had to keep convincing myself that this was worth my investment of time, as while I was informed, there was no denying that this work was just not hanging together. A big part of the problem is that "Pan-Americanism" was probably always just a glorified marketing slogan, and being a little more forthright about that reality would have served Rutkow well; not that I would accuse him of naivete. Secondly, there are really two different construction projects under consideration here; the effort to build a railroad in the 19th century, and the effort to build a commercial-grade highway in the 20th century. Both failed from issues of funding, the hostile climate, political skepticism across various countries, and the ultimately overriding issue of whether there was enough value to justify the investment.

As matters stand now, the route could be completed, if the will was there. The bottom line is that between the environmental issues, and the basic reality that Panama simply doesn't want a closer relationship with Colombia, the Darien "Gap" is not going to be closed anytime soon. That might illustrate what the ultimate problem always was with Pan-Americanism, it was mostly about linking the settler societies of North and South America, and didn't offer a lot of unalloyed value to the communities of Central America.
… (plus d'informations)
 
Signalé
Shrike58 | 1 autre critique | Nov 18, 2021 |

Listes

Prix et récompenses

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi

Statistiques

Œuvres
3
Membres
391
Popularité
#61,941
Évaluation
3.9
Critiques
9
ISBN
9

Tableaux et graphiques