T S Paul
Auteur de Conjuring Quantico
A propos de l'auteur
Crédit image: My picture I'm the author
Séries
Œuvres de T S Paul
The Federal Witch Series: An urban fantasy FBI thriller (The Collected Works Book 1) (2016) 8 exemplaires
Chronicles of Athena Lee Vol. 3 3 exemplaires
Chronicles of Athena Lee Vol. 2 3 exemplaires
Marcellas Garden Cookbook: Recipes from the World of the Federal Witch (Eat and Read, #3) 2 exemplaires
Ghosts of Noodlemass Past 2 exemplaires
Alpha Class 2 exemplaires
Shades of Learning 2 exemplaires
Marcella's Summer Bounty: Recipes from the World of the Federal Witch (Eat and Read, #2) 2 exemplaires
The Badger Hole Bar Food Cookbook: Recipes from the World of the Federal Witch (Eat and Read, #1) 2 exemplaires
Fergus Favorites Cookbook: Recipes from the World of the Federal Witch (Eat and Read, #4) 2 exemplaires
The Federal Witch Series: An urban fantasy FBI thriller (The Collected Works Book 3) (2018) 2 exemplaires
Jack Dalton: Monster Hunter, Book 9 1 exemplaire
Space Cadets 1 exemplaire
Jack Dalton: Monster Hunter, Book 7 1 exemplaire
Mysterious Hearts (Holiday Heartwarmers, #3) 1 exemplaire
No Tech, No Fun 1 exemplaire
A Grand Affair 1 exemplaire
Marcella's Autumn Harvest: Recipes from the World of the Federal Witch (Eat and Read, #6) 1 exemplaire
Camilla: The Collected Works 1 exemplaire
New Beginnings: Series Starter Set 1 exemplaire
Jack Dalton: Monster Hunter, Book 10 1 exemplaire
Oeuvres associées
Étiqueté
Partage des connaissances
Il n’existe pas encore de données Common Knowledge pour cet auteur. Vous pouvez aider.
Membres
Critiques
Not worth a dollar
People don’t blurt out historical knowledge just for fun. Certainly not personal history.
There is a serious problem defining distance in this novella. Really terrible.
How do you ‘flank’ a round battle station?
This felt like a very awkward play with no real point. A couple references to a mil-sf meme don’t do much to redeem this mess.
Disappointing, because the concept has merit.
People don’t blurt out historical knowledge just for fun. Certainly not personal history.
There is a serious problem defining distance in this novella. Really terrible.
How do you ‘flank’ a round battle station?
This felt like a very awkward play with no real point. A couple references to a mil-sf meme don’t do much to redeem this mess.
Disappointing, because the concept has merit.
Needs a content editor
It feels stream-of-consciousness. Maybe it's a pacing issue. Everything happens in a babble of words. Useful exposition, but high volume.
Also, the historical bits were poorly researched. Stalin wouldn't have been in a position to take power if a theocracy was running Russia until 1940. You can't simply slap new history on top of old history without making it work.
Finally, just because it's amusing doesn't mean it should be in the book.… (plus d'informations)
It feels stream-of-consciousness. Maybe it's a pacing issue. Everything happens in a babble of words. Useful exposition, but high volume.
Also, the historical bits were poorly researched. Stalin wouldn't have been in a position to take power if a theocracy was running Russia until 1940. You can't simply slap new history on top of old history without making it work.
Finally, just because it's amusing doesn't mean it should be in the book.… (plus d'informations)
Not worth a dollar
People don’t blurt out historical knowledge just for fun. Certainly not personal history.
There is a serious problem defining distance in this novella. Really terrible.
How do you ‘flank’ a round battle station?
This felt like a very awkward play with no real point. A couple references to a mil-sf meme don’t do much to redeem this mess.
Disappointing, because the concept has merit.
People don’t blurt out historical knowledge just for fun. Certainly not personal history.
There is a serious problem defining distance in this novella. Really terrible.
How do you ‘flank’ a round battle station?
This felt like a very awkward play with no real point. A couple references to a mil-sf meme don’t do much to redeem this mess.
Disappointing, because the concept has merit.
Vous aimerez peut-être aussi
Auteurs associés
Statistiques
- Œuvres
- 95
- Aussi par
- 1
- Membres
- 640
- Popularité
- #39,395
- Évaluation
- 3.7
- Critiques
- 15
- ISBN
- 55
- Favoris
- 1
It feels stream-of-consciousness. Maybe it's a pacing issue. Everything happens in a babble of words. Useful exposition, but high volume.
Also, the historical bits were poorly researched. Stalin wouldn't have been in a position to take power if a theocracy was running Russia until 1940. You can't simply slap new history on top of old history without making it work.
Finally, just because it's amusing doesn't mean it should be in the book.… (plus d'informations)