Photo de l'auteur

Critiques

12 sur 12
I finished it but I skipped whole chapters and didn't miss anything. Repetitive. The world puts this dorky professor in charge of repealing an alien invasion. Some interesting historical factoids that is it.
 
Signalé
debbie13410 | Jun 18, 2023 |
This was another Saturday lend from Zach, as I saw it just three books down from [b:The Pearl|5308|The Pearl|John Steinbeck|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1437234939s/5308.jpg|195832] on the office bookshelf, and I thought it was another book that Zach talked about as we pulled the canoe back towards the dock. Something-something-cheese moving. However, he was talking about it's predecessor and kick-off point, the book [b:Who Ate My Cheese?|3302365|Who Ate My Cheese?|John W. Nichols|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1347689673s/3302365.jpg|3339179], which he didn't happen to have a copy of. I think I've got the gist of that book through the context provided by this one, but my curiosity and inability to work with incomplete knowledge demands that I have to find a copy and read it for the sake of closure.

I give it two stars because it's so simple and didn't suggest any ideas I wasn't already thoroughly aware of and because the more we play with this rat-maze metaphor the more it falls apart. On the other hand, I totally agree that we need to remove "the maze from the mouse" and it's something I strive to do as much as I can. But god, I am depressingly complicit in so many of these structures I don't believe in and want to escape, and it seems to me that the author is too. And I'm reminded of a refrain from my critical theory prof wherein often the more we think we are outside an ideology, the more firmly we're ingrained in it.
 
Signalé
likecymbeline | 6 autres critiques | Apr 1, 2017 |
This was not what I was expecting and not very helpful.
 
Signalé
jimocracy | 6 autres critiques | Apr 18, 2015 |
Supposedly humorous take off on "Who moved my cheese" but it was not funny nor entertaining.
 
Signalé
FlyingMonster | 6 autres critiques | Jul 30, 2013 |
Dit boek is een reactie op de klassieker "Wie heeft mijn kaas gepikt?" (Johnson en Blanchard, 1998). Voor de (geconditioneerde) muizen in een doolhof draait alles om 'Kaas' (metafoor voor zekerheden). In deze parabel accepteren de muizen Max, Zeno en Reus de doolhof niet als een gegeven; ze ontsnappen eraan - ieder op zijn manier. De boodschap is helder: in plaats van alleen maar op veranderingen te reageren en naar kaas te zoeken, kunnen we er ook voor kiezen om onze eigen verandering te creëren. Daarvoor moeten we wel van het idee af dat we niet meer dan muizen in andermans doolhof zijn...

Het boek bevat een aantal zelfreflectie- en discussievragen (voor groepen, leesclubs, organisaties, teams) en opmerkingen (voor docenten, bestuurders en leidinggevenden).
Een goede start om ermee aan de slag te gaan (zie: http://www.librarything.nl/groups/ikhebjouwkaasgepikt)
 
Signalé
eliesz | 6 autres critiques | Jun 6, 2012 |
It wasn't anything special. Basically it talks about how you are in control of changes. The story is told through the life of three different mice and their propective on their life in the maze. I am not sure I would recommend the book.
 
Signalé
Jenni01 | 6 autres critiques | Mar 2, 2012 |
I'm getting tired of these. Good message. I guess I expected more than the ending it has.
 
Signalé
remikit | 6 autres critiques | Oct 30, 2011 |
Negotiation Genius is an extremely readable introduction to the world of negotiation. Written by a pair of Harvard professors, Genius walks the reader through key principles of successful negotiating. The authors are acutely aware of the likely audience's need for something tangible and concrete to take away and have explicitly constructed their work to be a toolkit for handling common scenarios.

The use of case studies throughout the book is an excellent way to handle the queries that inevitable arise. The best case study of all concerns the Cuban Missile Crisis which is accompanied by the author's implication that Kennedy was able to think strategically about negotiating even in the face of nuclear annihilation so what is it that another negotiation faces that is really so dangerous. Not all of the case studies work though - the example where one of the authors pays off a bunch of troublemakers to stop them attacking is hardly the height of ingenuity or bravery.

While Negotiation Genius is a textbook, it does not really read like one. The thought process behind negotiation strategy is laid out very effectively. The work begins with an introduction to value creation and capturing, explores the psychology of negotiation including non-rational behaviour, and tackles key real life issues including negotiating from weakness, handling liars etc. The tips are well thought-out and the messaging is generally highly consistent. The underlying theme seems to be securing as much information as possible before, during, and after the negotiation.

Malhotra and Bazerman have a firm belief in the self-interest of being cooperative. Their explanation of providing information in order to receive information makes sense. However, there is one inconsistency that is glaring - the ethics of negotiation are not well covered. Bazerman in particular has a theory about the evils of parasitic value creation. A chapter is devoted to Bazerman's idea and frankly it reads like a stereotypical academic begging the world to be more liberal and friendly. The ethics discussed are wholly at odds with the fundamental principle laid out in the first chapters of creating and then claiming as much value as possible. Lying in a negotiation is wrong according to Bazerman yet putting in an offer that is clearly unrepresentative of the negotiator's real position is not only acceptable but required. It is not possible for the academic to have it both ways - either the other side of the negotiation table can be influenced using the tips in this book or the negotiator should focus primarily on doing the right thing by society.

Genius is clearly written with hard-nosed American businesspeople in mind. The stereotype is that such people will be ruthless and potentially lacking the breadth of vision to understand that negotiation is often a game of repeated interaction. For those of us who are not so typically hard minded it is less useful to be continually reminded of the need to play the long game. Indeed, for anyone who has background in game theory the principles that Malhotra and Bazerman espouse will generally be quite recognisable. It is only the tips of how to achieve the influence that are different from the underlying decision theory.

While it is always easy to find the few flaws, Negotiation Genius is an excellent primer for the world of negotiation. It is not restricted to the simple price negotiation that is really quite easy to understand but instead builds on the range of real-life interactions that exist. While much of the case study material is just about price, it ranges all the way up to multilateral negotiations at the UN. For any negotiator not already steeped in years of experience and study on the matter, Negotiation Genius is a good way to start.
 
Signalé
Malarchy | 2 autres critiques | Dec 8, 2010 |
Picked up from the web. This is more interesting (to me) for the objective approach it advertises and the psychology involved than for any resemblance to the True Path of Negotiating.
 
Signalé
dogrover | 2 autres critiques | Aug 24, 2010 |
This is a must read book for negotiation. Warning it is slow in parts, but other parts are mind changing. Sales reps should read this book not only for the many insights and tools for ethical negotiation but also the techniques on investigation, value creation, persuasion and presentation of ideas. I have already benefited from the book. During a recent negotiation instead of dealing with one issue at a time and coming up short I used log rolling and expanding the pie to create more value for both sides. This is the kind of book I will listen to a second time after I try a few more things out.
 
Signalé
GShuk | 2 autres critiques | Apr 8, 2010 |
Cover; Title Page; Copyright; Contents; Preface; Part 1. Plant Auditing Methodology; Chapter 1. The Plant Audit; Chapter 2. Audit Categories; Chapter 3. Plant Audit-Why, When, and Where?; Chapter 4. Global and Specific Audits; Chapter 5. Specific Audit Process; Chapter 6. Metallurgical Myths, Economic Concepts, and Total Resource Management; Chapter 7. Sociopolitical and Cultural Issues; Part 2. Case Studies; Case Study 1: Global Audit; Case Study 2: Poorly Defined Program Objective; Case Study 3: Wrong Solution for the Right Problem
Case Study 4: The Myth That New Technology Improves RecoveryCase Study 5: Productivity Measures; Case Study 6: Improving Productivity; Case Study 7: Diagnostic Testing as a Tool for Optimization; Case Study 8: Coarse Versus Fine Primary Grind; Case Study 9: Thinking Outside the Box: Fine Crushing Versus Grinding; Case Study 10: Thinking Outside the Box: Classifier Efficiency; Case Study 11: Method for Measuring Performance of Ball Mills; Case Study 12: Comparison of Rougher Flotation Circuit Configurations; Case Study 13: Maintaining Plant Throughput
Case Study 14: Auditing a Complex Flotation CircuitCase Study 15: Auditing Process Technology for Industrial Minerals; Case Study 16: Operator Training; Case Study 17: Application of Computer Software for Obtaining Meaningful Material Balance; Case Study 18: Cleaner-Flotation-Circuit Evaluation; Case Study 19: Operating Parameters as a Function of Metal Prices; Case Study 20: Optimizing Cash Flow on International Operations; Appendix: Typical Questions to Ask During Plant Audit Meetings; References; Recommended Reading; Index; Back Cover
 
Signalé
SMELibrary | Jun 17, 2016 |
12 sur 12