Photo de l'auteur

A. R. Lacey (1926–2016)

Auteur de A Dictionary of Philosophy

4+ oeuvres 289 utilisateurs 3 critiques

A propos de l'auteur

A. R. Lacey was Senior Lecturer in Philosophy at King's College, London

Comprend les noms: A.R.Lacey

Comprend aussi: (2)

Œuvres de A. R. Lacey

A Dictionary of Philosophy (1976) 230 exemplaires
Robert Nozick. (1656) 33 exemplaires
Modern Philosophy, an Introduction (1982) 17 exemplaires
Bergson (1989) 9 exemplaires

Oeuvres associées

On Aristotle's "Physics 2" (1993) — Traducteur — 11 exemplaires

Étiqueté

Partage des connaissances

Nom légal
Lacey, Alan Robert
Date de naissance
1926
Date de décès
2016-07-04
Sexe
male
Nationalité
Groot-Brittannië
Lieu de naissance
Birmingham, Warwickshire, England, UK
Professions
filosoof
Organisations
Bedford College

Membres

Critiques

Philosophies raison d’etre is to think. To train how to think. The method of philosophy is reflection. An a priori account of expectations, as the conclusions arise before experience. Thinking which questions need be resolved. Philosophical resolutions create fields of study outside of philosophy, making philosophy appear to not have any resolutions. Philosophy does not have any particular problems that are under observation, as it is the process in which knowledge progresses. What is needed are not facts, for knowing facts does not entail its appropriate application. What is needed is how to think about appropriate application to knowledge. The author uses a logic approach to teach how to think using the base of communication, the way we use language to discuss everything.

The writing is a bit convoluted and many examples are not very interesting. As the approach of this book is via the use of language, the author uses sentences to see how their meaning changes based on the way in which it is viewed. What is missing from the sentences is the context they are in, making much of what is being discussed not very practical. There are references to how others view a particular explanation to a problem, but they are out of context making it difficult to understand what the author is reflecting to. To understand much of the book requires background knowledge about the philosophy of language.
… (plus d'informations)
 
Signalé
Eugene_Kernes | Jun 4, 2024 |
 
Signalé
laplantelibrary | Dec 5, 2021 |
A good, yet brief, reference for philosophy.
½
 
Signalé
tuckerresearch | Sep 11, 2006 |

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi

Auteurs associés

Statistiques

Œuvres
4
Aussi par
1
Membres
289
Popularité
#80,898
Évaluation
2.8
Critiques
3
ISBN
28
Langues
3

Tableaux et graphiques