Photo de l'auteur

Gavin Kendall

Auteur de Using Foucault's Methods

3 oeuvres 42 utilisateurs 4 critiques

Œuvres de Gavin Kendall

Étiqueté

Partage des connaissances

Sexe
male

Membres

Critiques

3.5/5 stars!

THE GIRL WHO HID IN THE TREES is a creepy novella that left me with a serious case of the willies!

In no-where town USA there is a forest-McConnell's Forest. Years ago, Jason lost his older brother, (as well as his brother's gang of friends), in that forest, and the mystery has never been solved. Now that Jason and HIS group of friends are grown, they're tired of hearing the rumors and stories, and they set out in the forest to find the truth. Will they discover what happened? More importantly, will they survive? You'll have to read this to find out!

On Saturday, sitting beside my sleeping mom in the nursing home, something rare happened. I found myself with nothing to read! I can think of only a few things more horrific for me. (Having my eyeball poked out with a fork, for instance.) I found this story on my Kindle app and have been meaning to read it for some time, so I did.

I immediately found myself drawn in to Jason's life and what it must be like to be "the boy whose brother was murdered in McConnell's Forest." A stigma of sorts was attached to Jason, (as does happen in small towns), but it eventually wore off as Jason got older. I loved the relationship he had with Vanessa and I thought that portion was well written. Once he and his girlfriend shared the fact that they both had had "experiences" in the forest, the fun begins.

I thought at that point, everything came racing at me much more quickly than it had in the first half (or so), of the book. I wouldn't have minded a little time spent with the entire group of friends, so that I could get to know them a wee bit better, thereby making what happened to them even more horrific. (Also, I thought it was pushing the envelope that the parents would allow the kids to do what they did so... easily, but I can't get into much more without spoilers.)

Overall though, I thought this tale fun, and about what you'd expect it to be from reading the synopsis. I look forward to reading more from this author!

Recommended!

… (plus d'informations)
 
Signalé
Charrlygirl | 1 autre critique | Mar 22, 2020 |
This book explores three separate problems while pointing the correct use of Foucault's method in various analyses.
First part of the book (some 50 pages in) explains basic Foucault's concepts like archaeology, genealogy, discourse and so on and how they relate to Foucault's methodology in general. Personally, I found this part of the book most interesting and useful.
Second part of the book, and most extensive one deals with philosophy of science and sociology of science, mainly theories of Bruno Latour and Thomas Kuhn. It gives an account of the usage of Foucault's method by the thinkers like Latour (Michel Callon). This part has left much to be desired from, as it doesn't really concentrate on Foucault, but Latour. Whether Latour really uses Foucault method or not is open to discussion.
Third part deals with employing Foucalt's methods in culture studies. It gives and example of reading classes for children. The focus point of this example is analyses of how the culture acts as management rather then factory of meaning in creating new citizens.
The book also uses fictional characters of students who study Foucault. The purpose of this is to show where they use Foucault's methods in the wrong way or how they transcribe their meaning to the Foucault's ideas in the process of taking various classes on Foucault.
Initially I found the concept inventive, but then I think it started to get in the way of actually discussing Foucault's method.
Overall the book could have been better if it concentrated more on Foucault as promised by the title.

… (plus d'informations)
 
Signalé
Jaskier | 1 autre critique | Dec 1, 2015 |
This book explores three separate problems while pointing the correct use of Foucault's method in various analyses.
First part of the book (some 50 pages in) explains basic Foucault's concepts like archaeology, genealogy, discourse and so on and how they relate to Foucault's methodology in general. Personally, I found this part of the book most interesting and useful.
Second part of the book, and most extensive one deals with philosophy of science and sociology of science, mainly theories of Bruno Latour and Thomas Kuhn. It gives an account of the usage of Foucault's method by the thinkers like Latour (Michel Callon). This part has left much to be desired from, as it doesn't really concentrate on Foucault, but Latour. Whether Latour really uses Foucault method or not is open to discussion.
Third part deals with employing Foucalt's methods in culture studies. It gives and example of reading classes for children. The focus point of this example is analyses of how the culture acts as management rather then factory of meaning in creating new citizens.
The book also uses fictional characters of students who study Foucault. The purpose of this is to show where they use Foucault's methods in the wrong way or how they transcribe their meaning to the Foucault's ideas in the process of taking various classes on Foucault.
Initially I found the concept inventive, but then I think it started to get in the way of actually discussing Foucault's method.
Overall the book could have been better if it concentrated more on Foucault as promised by the title.

… (plus d'informations)
 
Signalé
Me-chan | 1 autre critique | Jun 19, 2014 |
 
Signalé
OurWolvesDen | 1 autre critique | Mar 29, 2020 |

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi

Auteurs associés

Statistiques

Œuvres
3
Membres
42
Popularité
#357,757
Évaluation
3.0
Critiques
4
ISBN
8