Eleanor GrahamCritiques

Do you know that this book is part of the J. M. Barrie "Peter Pan Bequest"? This means that J. M. Barrie's royalty on this book goes to help the doctors and nurses to cure the children who are lying ill in the Great Ormond Street Hospital, London.

Includes favourites Naomi Mitchison's "Spring", and Dekker's "Art thou poor, yet hast thou golden slumbers?". It is a familiar theme in poetry (eg: Bunyan's "He that is down needs fear no fall" and Pope's "Happy the man whose wish and care") but it does resonate with me. I’m far from being a minimalist (“Haven’t you got enough ornaments?” a friend once said half-jokingly), but I find there are lots of things I can quite happily do without. In the current time of coronavirus lockdown, that’s probably just as well.

An old-fashioned feelgood tale, set at the original time of writing, about a family of children who are forced to live in a barn after their parents disappear and the landlord throws them out. They make shift to look after themselves by cooking in a haybox, mending their own clothes, and doing odd jobs around the village, befriended by the schoolteacher and a local tramp, harassed by the District Visitor, who - aided by the respectable middle-class ladies of the village - plots to get them separated and sent to foster homes. It offers a stereotypical but informative and not over-romanticized view of life in rural England in the 1930s. MB 10-i-2018

The story is what it says -- a family of children (some of them old enough to make it fairly plausible) live on their own in a barn after their parents disappear, repelling the attempts of do-gooders to take them away, and living by the rule ""No begging, borrowing, scrounging or stealing." I suppose their self-reliance may be intended as a conservative moral lesson, but as a child I simply liked it as a story.

An interesting and lively read. The main premise - of five children living mostly independently, helped by some neighbours and hindered/harassed by others - is clearly marked historically (some of the villagers think it entirely reasonable that a girl of not-yet-fourteen should be looking after her whole family by herself with no parents - but this is the 30s and in a rural setting). The powerlessness of the children in the face of antagonistic adults and the hard work needed to run a house - indeed, the impossibility of doing so long-term in the circumstances that they're in - is well-written, and even the happy ending is not too deus ex machina.½

(25 December 2011 – from Ali)

A charming book, half-remembered as I read it, so I must have absorbed the Puffin edition as a younger reader, about five siblings whose parents disappear. Set in the 1930s, a more innocent time, although obviously with more freedom, too, we see what happens when the village pulls together, in various ways, to support them when they move into a local barn. Sue struggles with the housework, her 11 year old brother does all the DIY, and the twins and youngest girl cause all sorts of mischief. I love it because it tells you exactly how they go about doing things, something reminiscent of the Swallows and Amazons books and very satisfying (not that I will ever feel the need to construct a haybox or cook a rabbit), and for the emotional sincerity. As other reviewers have mentioned, the part of the plot involving the parents is a little clunky, but it really doesn’t matter, as the book does what it sets out to do, and there are some great scenes and character development, as well as the excellently portrayed sibling relationships. A great read.

The Children Who Lived in a Barn is a children’s novel, set in an English village. When Mr. and Mrs. Dunnet are called away to be with a sick relative, they leave their five children (Susan, Bob, Joseph and Samuel the twins—called Jumbo and Sambo—and Alice) at home to manage by themselves. When the children are evicted, they move into a local barn, which they quickly make into a cozy home.

It’s a charming story. Of course, the logical side of my brain keeps poking holes in the story line—there’s no way in real life that these children, the oldest of whom is 14, would ever be allowed to stay at home by themselves or live in a barn. But the fantasy is part of the charm of this novel, and I’m sure that if I’d read this growing up, I would have enjoyed it much more. The novel kid of reminds me of the Bobbsey twins, mixed with the Boxcar Children series that I read when I was younger.

I liked watching how the five children managed, particularly under the direction of Susan, who seems so much older than 14, and Bob, who seems much older than 13 (it’s always in novels that children seem older than they really are!). The ending is of course completely implausible, a bit of a dues ex machina with a heavy number of coincidences in order to wrap up the story, but I kind of liked it, in an odd way. Part of the fun of children’s books is how escapist they are; things don’t have to make sense, which is something I tend to forget when I’m reading! In all, an enjoyable book, but since I’m out of practice in reading children’s books,I didn’t like this one as much as some of the pther Persephones I’ve read.½

My Mother recommended that I read this book when I was younger, but warned me that the final two pages had been ripped out. It took me 14 years to source another copy and I am so glad I did. It is a fabulous book that I would recommend to anyone, particularly as it is a tale without violence and hate that so many contemporary stories have.

This a sweet little cosy read - which I finished very quickly. The children are engaing in an old fashioned way, and the situation they find themselves in - while it feels unrealistic to an adult - would read like a huge adventure to a child reader I suppose. I always find with books originally written for children from this sort of period - that they're written in such a different way to modern children's books, wordier with greater depth, and better description. Its this which probably make them more accesible to adults, than many modern childrens books would be. Highly enjoyable - loved it!

I first read this book when I was a child and was very taken with the idea of living in a barn with no parents. Reading it as an adult I find the whole premise of it quite amazing - parents just disappear and children pretty much left to get on with it. Worth reading for its curiosity value.

An adaptation of J.M. Barrie's classic play Peter Pan: retold in novel form by Eleanor Graham, illustrated by Edward Ardizzone. The dialogue scenes are good, of course, but there is a lot of extra description that's not as appealing. Good overall, but meant for older juvenile readers. Illustrated with ink drawings, and 6 colour plates (watercolours).

disbound. t.p. and some pages wanting.