Kath Filmer-Davies
Auteur de Fantasy Fiction and Welsh Myth: Tales of Belonging
Œuvres de Kath Filmer-Davies
Étiqueté
Partage des connaissances
- Sexe
- female
Membres
Critiques
Statistiques
- Œuvres
- 2
- Membres
- 8
- Popularité
- #1,038,911
- Évaluation
- 3.8
- Critiques
- 2
- ISBN
- 4
I say that, because presumably you are buying it, you are interested in Welsh folklore (let's not say "myth," since that can be misinterpreted) as well as in modern fantasy. I'm certainly interested in Welsh folklore, including the Mabinogion -- but of all the many fantasy books cited in here, the only ones I've read are Lloyd Alexander's Chronicles of Prydain. Indeed, I bought the book specifically because it was supposed to have very good insights into Alexander.
To give the book its due, Prydain is given unusually detailed attention in the chapter "The Place of the Pig-Keeper: To Know Oneself." No other author gets such a long chapter all to himself (although Stephen Lawhead may get more mentions overall). But the chapter on Prydain is... not superficial, exactly; for the most part, it understands the point of the books. But the details are often very inaccurate. For example, page 71 refers to "Arvon, which I assume is Caernarfon." But there is no reference to "Arvon" in the books (I verified my memory by checking Michael O. Tunnell's The Prydain Companion). I assume the reference to Avren -- the river Avren, which, however, has nothing to do with Caernarfon; the Avren is the Severn. There are many similar errors; the book really seems to be based on memories of a superficial reading.
And Filmer-Davies has not studied the history of the works; she clearly assumes they were written in the internal order of the events. But, in fact, the fifth book, The High King, was written before the fourth, Taran Wanderer. This doesn't affect the story itself, which flows smoothly, but it should affect how we understand the story: Alexander tried to write his tale without showing Taran having to learn that life is not always glory and romance, and that there is a difference between social role and being one's self. It didn't work. So Alexander had to go back and write Taran Wanderer, even though it means a whole book without Eilonwy, the brightest and most interesting character in the series (and Alexander's attempt to promote women's rights in a genre that all too often treated women as if it were still the Middle Ages. There have been women who criticized Eilonwy's role -- in the end, she sacrificed more than she should have had to for Taran -- but there is no question but that Alexander meant her to show that women deserved every right and honor that men deserved. As Alexander later said, he didn't know any stupid or incapable women!).
I think Filmer-Davies also fails to understand the Welsh element in the Chronicles. The "Welsh-ness" is indispensable to the Chronicles (anyone who has read Alexander's other works will know how much richer Prydain is than anything else he wrote) -- but the tales are not Welsh. Prydain is not a retelling of The Mabinogion, nor is it a retelling of the Arthur legend in any of its forms, even though it ends with an unknown becoming a King. The thematic elements are straight out of medieval romance, although with an egalitarianism that is more Welsh (or American, or Mongol for that matter!) than English. The Welsh elements give the story a Tolkien-esque richness that would not otherwise be there, but if Alexander had adopted (say) Maori myth, he probably could have told almost the same story, except that the names wouldn't be as pretty as those so-evocative Welsh words.
That's too much attention to pay to a chapter that is, after all, only a tenth of the book. But it's the only part I can judge fairly -- and it is, at best, erratic and unreliable. Which obviously implies that the rest, which I cannot judge, is also unreliable. Filmer-Davies is right that Welsh myth has had a lot of influence on modern fantasy (after all, she fills a whole book without even mentioning Evangeline Walton!). This is a topic that deserves a detailed study. But I fear that this is not it.… (plus d'informations)