Photo de l'auteur
2 oeuvres 173 utilisateurs 7 critiques

Critiques

Some of the chapters were great but some of them felt like they dragged on forever. I love sharks but I wish the book had been more consistent.
 
Signalé
cdaley | 5 autres critiques | Nov 2, 2023 |
Demon Fish is not so much a book about sharks as about shark conservation in the face of the depredations of commercial fishing and adventure tourism. A reader who comes to this book expecting to learn about the animals themselves, as I did, is likely to be disappointed.

Eilperin places sharks within an evolutionary and cultural context that goes back to pre-history. Civilisations across the globe, from PNG to the Aztecs to the Chinese, have revered sharks. In the latter case, this has transmuted into a cultural eating practice that threatens sharks' very survival and, with them, a host of other creatures in the oceanic food chain.

Most of the book is devoted to Eilperin reiterating her message that global conservation measures are needed urgently, with stories from around the world of the impact of shark exploitation and some isolated examples of communities that have found ways of living with sharks rather than killing them for profit.

In the end though, Eilperin comes across as somewhat naive. Anyone who has observed the world's progress on dealing with climate change will realise how untenable are her calls for a globally co-ordinated effort on shark protection. After all, if we can't co-operate in our own interest we're unlikely to do so on behalf of another species. Similarly, the workings of the International Whaling Commission are a perfect study of the likely response when calls are made to restrict the exploitation of a resource some countries see as part of tbeir cultural heritage.

In short, Eilperin's hoped-for solution is never going to happen, and her book might have been stronger had she acknowledged that and set out some new ideas for long-term shark survival. As it stands, the sinking feeling one takes away from her book is that the damage is irreversible and we may be one of the last few generations of humans to see these wonderful animals in the wild.
 
Signalé
gjky | 5 autres critiques | Apr 9, 2023 |
This book examines how different cultural traditions and fads are helping to deplete shark stocks around the world. While it explores the impacts of increasing demand for shark-fin soup, sports fishing, commercial fishing and the psychological fear towards sharks that Jaws perpetuated, it also cleverly frames cultural traditions and pursuits as a way to change attitudes towards sharks and increase their value as part of eco-tourism ventures.
 
Signalé
kenno82 | 5 autres critiques | Oct 30, 2013 |
If sharks interest you, you'll want to read this book. Eilperin, a Washington Post reporter, provides the latest information about sharks. Unfortunately, her writing style is not very exciting, but the information makes it worth reading anyway.
New developments that she describes include documented cases of virgin births in captive sharks, the increase in whale shark tourism, new research on shark repellents, and the shark fin soup industry. One of the strong points of the book is its international coverage, from Mexico to New Guinea, Belize, South Africa, and China.
The main focus of Eilperin's book is the recent research into shark populations, documenting the drastic reduction in shark numbers worldwide. I'm one of those who doesn't feel that's necessarily a bad thing, but Eilperin makes a good case that it is very harmful to oceanic ecosystems, and thus to us all.
Eilperin is pro-shark, and makes a persuasive case for the creature. I'm sure it is true, as she states, that many more people die from household accidents than from shark attacks. However, as I write this, one of the top stories in the UK press concerns the killing of a honeymooner in the Seychelles by a shark. That might have been good for the local ecosystem, but I'm sure his brand new widow is not comforted by Eilperin's statistics.
 
Signalé
WaltNoise | 5 autres critiques | Aug 18, 2011 |
Sharks. Fish to be feared? Or, should we be exchanging our fear for awe? These ancient fish that have evolved for eons are now facing decimation, and in the case of certain species, humans are the ones doing the killing. As the author points out, sharks are hard to love. They aren’t soft and fuzzy and they’re saddled with all those teeth that look ready to take a leg off. How do you make that appealing? I found Demon Fish a very enjoyable read but I’m one of those people that believes sharks can be lovable or at the very least fascinating.

Traveling to South Africa, Papua New Guinea, Hong Kong, and Belize, Eilperin meets with shark callers, scientists, shark evangelists, fisherman, environmentalists, restaurateurs selling shark fin soup, and even meets a few sharks up close. It’s all done in an attempt to understand what draws people to sharks with all their sharp teeth and fins. Frankly, in some instances, it’s cold hard cash but for others, it’s true admiration. Each though has a strange reverence for the fish even the ones that make their living off dead sharks.

It’s full of facts: what it takes to track a shark, DNA studies, the cost of shark fins, and shark fishing. I found myself constantly amazed by the cash amounts assigned to certain parts of a shark’s anatomy. I also wanted to follow my husband around citing random shark facts at him. Considering my husband doesn’t share my love of sharks, he would have found this really annoying. I would have found it enlightening and fun.

I’ve mentioned this before; I’m a huge fan of the Discovery Channel’s Shark Week. I actually wrote this while watching an episode on great whites so I guess it’s fitting that I’m posting it today. While this book focused on the economy of sharks --- their worth on the open market as well as their scientific and ecological worth --- I enjoyed it. I would have liked more information about specific species (Have you ever heard of a salmon shark or a goblin shark?) but that wasn’t the focus of the book, however, it was still a satisfying read. If you have an interest in sharks, this is a good addition to your library.
 
Signalé
justabookreader | 5 autres critiques | Aug 5, 2011 |
This is a book about what people think about sharks and what people do to (and with) sharks. It also has the feel of a layperson's travelogue into a variety of shark-related hotspots, seasoned with interview summaries and the occasional personal reflection. Juliet Eilperin abruptly shifts from discussing early mythological depictions of sharks, to the controversies of shark fin soup, ecotourism, food chain hierarchies, sport fishing, marine biology, and the legacy of Peter Benchley. The end result is a pretty decent little book about sharks; it's also a book that is extremely discursive and curiously low on passion. There are a lot of facts packed into the pages (although none that are so complex or complete that they disturb the lightness of the prose), as well as compelling anecdotes and a sense of peril that is de rigueur in modern environmental writing. Ultimately, this is a satisfying but often bloodless whirlwind tour of the relationship between people, sharks, and the biosphere that we all share.
 
Signalé
Narboink | 5 autres critiques | May 12, 2011 |
4225 Fight Club Politics How Partisanship Is Poisoning the House of Representatives, by Juliet Eilperin (read 2 Nov 2006) This is a 2006 book on the sorry state of the House of Representatives, where the GOP right wing arrogantly determines it need not pay any attention to the Democrats. The book shows the Democrats in bygone times could be arbitrary too, but the Democrats were less monolithic than are today's Republican majority. This book is even-handed but it was not fun to read. There is an interesting chapter on redistricting, which is a sorry story. The author says Iowa, New Jersey, and Arizona have admirable ways to redistrict, but it seems clear to me Iowa's way is the best because it draws lines ignoring political considerations--the only state that does. The blatant political line drawing in Texas is a disgrace, although California in the past also was blatantly partisan. As a result few seats are competitive. The author says the GOP will control the House till 2013--a prediction happily proved wrong on Nov 7.½
 
Signalé
Schmerguls | Oct 27, 2007 |