Photo de l'auteur

Jez ButterworthCritiques

Auteur de Jerusalem

18+ oeuvres 587 utilisateurs 9 critiques

Critiques

A lot of the familiar setup. Generally enjoyable to watch. Excellent actors. Story has weak points, and too many chase scenes.
— Rebecca½
 
Signalé
pandr65 | 3 autres critiques | Dec 13, 2023 |
El arqueólogo Indiana Jones deberá emprender otra aventura contra el tiempo para intentar recuperar un dial legendario que puede cambiar el curso de la historia. Acompañado por su ahijada, Jones pronto se encuentra enfrentándose a Jürgen Voller, un ex nazi que trabaja para la NASA.
 
Signalé
tecnomultimedia | 3 autres critiques | Sep 12, 2023 |
2023 movie #115. 2023. Non-stop action from start to finish. Ford's stuntmen must have been exhausted. Chasing all over the world for a mystical McGuffin before the Nazis (in 1969) get it. It was OK.
 
Signalé
capewood | 3 autres critiques | Jul 8, 2023 |
Gielgud Theatre, London. Masterpiece.
 
Signalé
arewenotben | Jul 31, 2020 |
Brilliant. Well, if you hate Theatre of the Absurd, like it seems everybody I know does, then steer well clear.
 
Signalé
bringbackbooks | Jun 16, 2020 |
Absolutely loved it, I guarantee it'll be considered a masterpiece in years to come. It certainly deserves to be. Oh how I wish I could have seen the play performed when it was in London (it's currently on Broadway with Mark freaking Rylance) just to get the full impact of the story. Jez Butterworth's crafted a completely bonkers but highly enjoyable tale, equal parts hilarious and tragic and always very powerful. It's a vision of the real England of the 21st century in a small town that hangs onto tradition for the sake of tradition while everyone tries to cope with the changes. Rooster may not be a nice man, and sometimes he's very unlikeable, but he's a fascinating man, a complete powerhouse of tales, delusions and a fool-like clarity that reminded me of Shakespeare's most famous fool, Falstaff. A man viewed in equal parts with admiration and mockery by everyone around him, he has a view of the world nobody else has and he'll fight to the end to keep it that way. People lament the loss of the England of old but Butterworth questions whether that national identity ever existed. The teenagers that hang around his trailer hoping to score some drugs or alcohol enjoy his company and laugh at his increasingly ridiculous tales (the telling of stories is a key element of the play) but Rooster is also a cautionary tale, one that none of them want to end up like. He's the twisted daredevil Pied Piper, one they want to follow despite their common sense.

The first two parts of the play are hilarious, packed full of creatively profane language and pop culture references, painting a picture of an England more concerned with parties and drinking than any sense of patriotism. It's setting the story up for the inevitable fall, one that must and will happen. It's a strange play, often surreal and ridiculous and definitely not for everyone, but there's something undeniably fascinating about Jerusalem. Part parable, part social commentary, part updated Shakespearean tragi-comedy, it's a mish-mash of perfectly organised chaos. There's a cutting intelligence behind the Cheryl Cole jokes and frequent use of the 'c' word, one that exposes the hypocrisy of hanging onto old traditions whilst exposing the real England. Packed full of iconic English imagery and metaphors, it's one that definitely requires a reread (and a national tour please!)

Here's a trailer for the Broadway production: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fcp4mwNQ7AQ
 
Signalé
Ceilidhann | 2 autres critiques | Sep 20, 2013 |
Text of this outstanding play, so memorably portrayed by a Mark Rylance-led cast on the West End and Broadway in 2009-11. The writing is extremely witty and sharp, also tersely expressive and dense in meaning, leading to the Shakespearian comparisons several reviewers have identified. This and the brief but meaningful stage directions reward the reading of this playtext. What is still missing here is some analysis, unpicking the various references to Blake's hymn, to St George, to May-day revels, presumably lamenting some kind of lost or threatened vitality in English culture, presumably again embodied in the character of the play's hero, Rooster Byron.
 
Signalé
eglinton | 2 autres critiques | Oct 29, 2011 |
Jerusalem is about many things, from the hard partying gang that hangs about Rooster's rickety Airstream trailer, to the sadness of the discrimination against Romanys - Gitanes - Gypsies - of which he turns out to be one. Condemned to making money as a daredevil in his youth and a blood donor in middle age, Rooster is determined to live large - while the local town does its utmost to boot him out. In between, we are treated to the magic of central England, the fairies and giants and mystical beings that inhabit the woods and glens that for centuries have provided our legends. From Robin Hood to hobbits to Shrek, this setting is as fertile as they come, and author Jez Butterworth milks it to its fullest.

The first two acts are riotously funny, setting us up for the dismal fall, which is obvious from the beginning - this can't last. And it doesn't. But along the way we are treated to Rooster's intelligence, his understanding of the way things work, and his role in them. It's a remarkable story of coping and survival in a hostile environment, buried in a haze of gin and marijuana, as anybody in his situation might descend to. To that point, Jerusalem is highly believable. This could (and of course has been) going on in real life. Only the wonderfully involved massive and mammoth lies that Rooster spins are obviously made up. He has made himself into one of the great legends of the woods, remaining Rooster while generation after generation of teenagers in search of something more hang out for a while and move on.

A delightfully complex story, though readers don't have to get all this from reading it. As a straight story it is highly entertaining. But make no mistake, there is a masterpiece lurking in these pages.
 
Signalé
DavidWineberg | 2 autres critiques | Apr 13, 2011 |