Phyllis M. Betz
Auteur de The Lesbian Fantastic: A Critical Study of Science Fiction, Fantasy, Paranormal and Gothic Writings
A propos de l'auteur
Phyllis M. Betz is an assistant professor of English at La Salle University in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. She lives in Burlington, New Jersey
Œuvres de Phyllis M. Betz
Étiqueté
Partage des connaissances
- Sexe
- female
- Lieux de résidence
- Burlington, New Jersey, USA
- Professions
- assistant professor of English
Membres
Critiques
Cette critique a été écrite dans le cadre des Critiques en avant-première de LibraryThing.This was an interesting book. I follow critical work on feminism and science fiction, so I was pleased to see more done on this topic. However, I thought that it could have gone into more detail and could have used *more* critical analysis and sources.
Cette critique a été écrite dans le cadre des Critiques en avant-première de LibraryThing.Betz makes an excellent comparison to how women are treated in the heterosexual fantasy genre versus women in fantasy where lesbian is the theme. While women in heterosexual fantasy are constantly treated as damsels, secondary characters in their own lives, fantasy geared toward lesbians have women taking and being in control. Lesbian fantasy has strong women characters that are sensual and sexy. However, I did not think that her Gothic analysis fit well with the rest of her book.
Cette critique a été écrite dans le cadre des Critiques en avant-première de LibraryThing.When The Lesbian Fantastic: A Critical Study of Science Fiction, Fantasy, Paranormal and Gothic Writings by Phyllis M. Betz was offered through LibraryThing's Early Reviewers program, I immediately requested a copy. An avid reader of science fiction and fantasy since my youth, and with a personal interest in all things queer (I mean no offense by the term, it's how I identify), I was excited for the opportunity to read The Lesbian Fantastic. Betz has previously written two other full-length works about lesbian genre fiction: Lesbian Detective Fiction: Women as Author, Subject and Reader in 2006 and Lesbian Romance Novels: A History and Critical Analysis in 2009. The Lesbian Fantastic was published by McFarland in 2011. Even though I haven't read any of Betz's previous works, although their subject matter does interest me, I was looking forward to reading The Lesbian Fantastic.
Gothic, fantasy, and science fiction literature deal with human confrontations with the "Other." Stereotypically, the genres are frequently associated with straight men and male readership. In The Lesbian Fantastic Betz explores how these genres and their tropes have been adopted and adapted by and for lesbians, who are often considered to be the Other in society. After a preface and introduction, The Lesbian Fantastic begins with a chapter on the historical backgrounds and contexts shared by the genres. Betz then devotes a chapter to each genre separately as well as a chapter to mixed genre works. The Lesbian Fantastic ends with Betz's conclusions, the appendix "Why Would a Lesbian Author Use Gay Characters Rather Than Lesbian Ones?", chapter notes, a list of works cited, and an index.
The Lesbian Fantastic is inconsistent in how it portrays itself. The description on the back cover and the subtitle seem to indicate that science fiction is the genre most prominently addressed while in fact it is the one with the least information on it in the book. Paranormal isn't explored as its own genre and is instead folded into gothic, the genre that Betz spends the most time discussing. Betz also made the regrettable decision to employ the term "fantasy" to encompass all of the genres examined in The Lesbian Fantastic while continuing to use two other definitions of the word, including the one for the more specific fantasy genre. It is not always clear exactly what material Betz is analyzing in each chapter, sometimes looking a books written by lesbians and sometimes looking at books that are representative of lesbians or include lesbian characters or perspectives. Betz also has the unfortunate tendency to confuse sexuality and gender, which admittedly are very closely related but are two distinct concepts.
Although Betz has some interesting ideas and makes some valid arguments, overall I found The Lesbian Fantastic more frustrating than anything else. The Lesbian Fantastic is not a long book; each chapter is progressively shorter, meaning Betz doesn't have the space to thoroughly examine each subject. Volumes could be written about each individual genre alone; Betz only scratches the surface and is unfocused enough that most of the genres and subgenres aren't done any justice. I do understand why Betz would choose to address gothic, fantasy, and science fiction together in The Lesbian Fantastic. The genres are closely related in their history and in the themes they address. It is notoriously difficult to draw definitive lines between the genres upon which all fans and critics would agree. But the most problematic issue with The Lesbian Fantastic are the errors scattered throughout the book. Sadly, these aren't limited to typographical errors. I noticed several facts that Betz got wrong, too, which makes me question the rest of The Lesbian Fantastic. Still, the book does provide some interesting food for thought.
Experiments in Reading… (plus d'informations)
Gothic, fantasy, and science fiction literature deal with human confrontations with the "Other." Stereotypically, the genres are frequently associated with straight men and male readership. In The Lesbian Fantastic Betz explores how these genres and their tropes have been adopted and adapted by and for lesbians, who are often considered to be the Other in society. After a preface and introduction, The Lesbian Fantastic begins with a chapter on the historical backgrounds and contexts shared by the genres. Betz then devotes a chapter to each genre separately as well as a chapter to mixed genre works. The Lesbian Fantastic ends with Betz's conclusions, the appendix "Why Would a Lesbian Author Use Gay Characters Rather Than Lesbian Ones?", chapter notes, a list of works cited, and an index.
The Lesbian Fantastic is inconsistent in how it portrays itself. The description on the back cover and the subtitle seem to indicate that science fiction is the genre most prominently addressed while in fact it is the one with the least information on it in the book. Paranormal isn't explored as its own genre and is instead folded into gothic, the genre that Betz spends the most time discussing. Betz also made the regrettable decision to employ the term "fantasy" to encompass all of the genres examined in The Lesbian Fantastic while continuing to use two other definitions of the word, including the one for the more specific fantasy genre. It is not always clear exactly what material Betz is analyzing in each chapter, sometimes looking a books written by lesbians and sometimes looking at books that are representative of lesbians or include lesbian characters or perspectives. Betz also has the unfortunate tendency to confuse sexuality and gender, which admittedly are very closely related but are two distinct concepts.
Although Betz has some interesting ideas and makes some valid arguments, overall I found The Lesbian Fantastic more frustrating than anything else. The Lesbian Fantastic is not a long book; each chapter is progressively shorter, meaning Betz doesn't have the space to thoroughly examine each subject. Volumes could be written about each individual genre alone; Betz only scratches the surface and is unfocused enough that most of the genres and subgenres aren't done any justice. I do understand why Betz would choose to address gothic, fantasy, and science fiction together in The Lesbian Fantastic. The genres are closely related in their history and in the themes they address. It is notoriously difficult to draw definitive lines between the genres upon which all fans and critics would agree. But the most problematic issue with The Lesbian Fantastic are the errors scattered throughout the book. Sadly, these aren't limited to typographical errors. I noticed several facts that Betz got wrong, too, which makes me question the rest of The Lesbian Fantastic. Still, the book does provide some interesting food for thought.
Experiments in Reading… (plus d'informations)
1 
PhoenixTerran | 7 autres critiques | Feb 25, 2012 |
PhoenixTerran | 7 autres critiques | Feb 25, 2012 | Statistiques
- Œuvres
- 4
- Membres
- 38
- Popularité
- #383,442
- Évaluation
- 3.0
- Critiques
- 8
- ISBN
- 7
Approximately 75% of the book was an analysis of the problem of fantasy genre categorization. Honestly, a brief presentation of these issues in the historical background chapter would have been enough for me. Instead, much of the book read more like a dissertation on the question of "What Exactly Counts as Fantasy/Science Fiction/Gothic?" Some of the primary sources cited provided a queer perspective, but many were more general. I would have rather the entire analysis assumed some basic knowledge about the different fantasy genres and then discussed how "The Lesbian Fantastic" expands or challenges those basic distinctions. Unfortunately, that discussion was only a small portion of this book. To make matters worse, the same gothic vs. fantasy vs. science fiction vs. romance vs. detective/mystery debate got rehashed in each of the five chapters. This emphasis took away from the discussion of lesbian-centered works that should have been the focus of the book.
In fact, only in Chapter 2 (on Lesbian Gothic), was the focus actually on lesbian works. The bulk of the chapter is an analysis/comparison of Karen Minns' Bloodsong and Jewell Gomez' The Gilda Stories as vampire tales. The final third of the chapter briefly presents several lesbian ghost stories and werewolf tales. After reading this chapter, my main criticism was that it focused too extensively on only two works . . . but it ended up being the most lesbian-centered chapter in the whole book.
The first third of Chapter 3 (on Lesbian Fantasy) is more general history and genre analysis with barely anything about lesbians at all. The chapter then briefly mentions female-centered fantasy before devolving into a discussion of the television show, Xena: Warrior Princess. Specific works of lesbian fantasy are only mentioned (and each only briefly) in the last third of the chapter.
Chapter 4 (on Lesbian Science Fiction) has many of the same problems as Chapter 3, though at least the opening digression contains a discussion of women-authored (though not lesbian) texts (rather than the tired rehashing of Dracula, Lord of the Rings, etc. that was repeated in the previous chapters). Honestly, if so much time had to be spent on non-lesbian texts, I would have rather been reading about Harry Potter (which was never even mentioned at all).
Chapter 5 on Mixed Genres was even more baffling/disappointing. Rather than introducing new works that bridge categories, some of the same works mentioned in earlier chapters were discussed again to illustrate how each genre contains elements of the other genres. *Yawn*.
By the time I got the Conclusion and Appendix, I just wanted to be done.
Finally, the numerous spelling and grammatical errors throughout the text were a huge distraction. (I should have anticipated trouble when Katherine Forrest's name was misspelled on p. 6!) Using the spelling/grammar check in a word processor is not enough; many instances similar to "that" for "than", "it"/"is"/"if", "Output" for "Outpost" (in a book title no less), as well as numerous errors of noun/verb agreement, slipped through whatever process was used. In addition to simple errors, the book contained quite a few cases of awkward sentence structure and/or mis-matched parallel construction (e.g., " . . . Orwell's 1984 and Esquivel's Like Water for Chocolate . . . studied for their representation of magic realism and dystopian fiction" (p. 6) will leave the reader grossly misinformed about the class of each work). Also, please review the proper use of [sic] in quotations: it is not necessary to flag a British vs. American spelling; however, [sic] should be used when a word in a quotation is actually misspelled. Unfortunately, in The Lesbian Fantastic, nearly every instance of British spelling was flagged with [sic], while the many instances of actual misspelling within quotations, and not noted with [sic], leads me to believe that the originals were probably just fine, and the errors were introduced by the person doing the quoting.
In summary, if you are interested in Lesbian Fantasy/Science Fiction, you might want to scan the bibliography of The Lesbian Fantastic and/or page through the last 10 pages of each chapter to note the lesbian books mentioned. I honestly can't recommend spending the time to read this entire book.… (plus d'informations)