AccueilGroupesDiscussionsPlusTendances
Site de recherche
Ce site utilise des cookies pour fournir nos services, optimiser les performances, pour les analyses, et (si vous n'êtes pas connecté) pour les publicités. En utilisant Librarything, vous reconnaissez avoir lu et compris nos conditions générales d'utilisation et de services. Votre utilisation du site et de ses services vaut acceptation de ces conditions et termes.

Résultats trouvés sur Google Books

Cliquer sur une vignette pour aller sur Google Books.

Chargement...

The Best American Science Writing 2002 (2002)

par Matt Ridley (Directeur de publication), Jesse Cohen (Series Editor)

Autres auteurs: Natalie Angier (Contributeur), Lisa Belkin (Contributeur), David Berlinski (Contributeur), Joseph D'Agnese (Contributeur), Julian Dibbell (Contributeur)16 plus, Christopher Dickey (Contributeur), Tim Folger (Contributeur), Darcy Frey (Contributeur), Atul Gawande (Contributeur), Jerome Groopman (Contributeur), Sarah Blaffer Hrdy (Contributeur), Carolyn Meinel (Contributeur), Oliver Morton (Contributeur), Mary Rogan (Contributeur), Sally Satel (Contributeur), Lauren Slater (Contributeur), Michael Specter (Contributeur), Margaret Talbot (Contributeur), Gary Taubes (Contributeur), Nicholas Wade (Contributeur), Steven Weinberg (Contributeur)

Séries: The Best American Science Writing (2002), Best American (2002)

MembresCritiquesPopularitéÉvaluation moyenneDiscussions
1461187,895 (3.93)Aucun
If, as Matt Ridley suggests, science is simply the search for new forms of ignorance, then perhaps it follows that with science's advances come new questions. Will human genetic engineering become commonplace? Will human cloning ever be safe? Are there many universes? How much will the climate change during the coming century? The Best American Science Writing 2002 gathers top writers and scientists covering the latest developments in the fastest-changing, farthest-reaching scientific fields, such as medicine, genetics, computer technology, evolutionary psychology, cutting-edge physics, and the environment. Among this year's selections: In "The Made-to-Order Savior," Lisa Belkin spotlights two desperate families seeking an unprecedented cure by a medically and ethically unprecedented means -- creating a genetically matched child. Margaret Talbot's "A Desire to Duplicate" reveals that the first human clone may very likely come from an entirely unexpected source, and sooner than we think. Michael Specter reports on the shock waves rippling through the field of neuroscience following the revolutionary discovery that adult brain cells might in fact regenerate ("Rethinking the Brain"). Christopher Dickey's "I Love My Glow Bunny" recounts with sly humor a peculiar episode in which genetic engineering and artistic culture collide. Natalie Angier draws an insightful contrast between suicide terrorists and rescue workers who risk their lives, and finds that sympathy and altruism have a definite place in the evolution of human nature, David Berlinski's "What Brings a World into Being?" ponders the idea of biology and physics as essentially digital technologies, exploring the mysteries encoded in the universe's smallest units, be they cells or quanta. Nicholas Wade shows how one of the most controversial books of the year, The Skeptical Environmentalist, by former Greenpeace member and self-described leftist Bjorn Lomborg, debunks some of the most cherished tenets of the environmental movement, suggesting that things are perhaps not as bad as we've been led to believe. And as a counterpoint, Darcy Frey's profile of George Divoky reveals a dedicated researcher whose love of birds and mystery leads to some sobering discoveries about global warming and forcefully reminds us of the unsung heroes of science: those who put in long hours, fill in small details, and take great trouble. In the end, the unanswered questions are what sustain scientific inquiry, open new frontiers of knowledge, and lead to new technologies and medical treatments. The Best American Science Writing 2002 is a series of exciting reports from science's front lines, where what we don't know is every bit as important as what we know.… (plus d'informations)
Aucun
Chargement...

Inscrivez-vous à LibraryThing pour découvrir si vous aimerez ce livre

Actuellement, il n'y a pas de discussions au sujet de ce livre.

Matt Ridley notes in his introduction that he has a soft spot for contrarians. He picked a fair number of articles for their contrarian scientific views. But the problem with that approach is that the writing then tends to focus on the controversy and the personalities rather than the science. While I love me some good drama, I really like science. In a few cases, I felt pretty short-shrifted by how shallow the actual science coverage was in the article. You can sort of see that by the number of articles that come from culture magazines such as The New Yorker or Esquire as compared to science magazines like Science or Scientific American. The lack of science is hardly the fault of the individual writers. Generally, they were writing what their editors needed to fill the magazines. Ridley could have used different selection criteria, and so the responsibility must lie with him.

(Full review at my blog) ( )
  KingRat | Jun 17, 2008 |
aucune critique | ajouter une critique

» Ajouter d'autres auteur(e)s

Nom de l'auteurRôleType d'auteurŒuvre ?Statut
Ridley, MattDirecteur de publicationauteur principaltoutes les éditionsconfirmé
Cohen, JesseSeries Editorauteur principaltoutes les éditionsconfirmé
Angier, NatalieContributeurauteur secondairetoutes les éditionsconfirmé
Belkin, LisaContributeurauteur secondairetoutes les éditionsconfirmé
Berlinski, DavidContributeurauteur secondairetoutes les éditionsconfirmé
D'Agnese, JosephContributeurauteur secondairetoutes les éditionsconfirmé
Dibbell, JulianContributeurauteur secondairetoutes les éditionsconfirmé
Dickey, ChristopherContributeurauteur secondairetoutes les éditionsconfirmé
Folger, TimContributeurauteur secondairetoutes les éditionsconfirmé
Frey, DarcyContributeurauteur secondairetoutes les éditionsconfirmé
Gawande, AtulContributeurauteur secondairetoutes les éditionsconfirmé
Groopman, JeromeContributeurauteur secondairetoutes les éditionsconfirmé
Hrdy, Sarah BlafferContributeurauteur secondairetoutes les éditionsconfirmé
Meinel, CarolynContributeurauteur secondairetoutes les éditionsconfirmé
Morton, OliverContributeurauteur secondairetoutes les éditionsconfirmé
Rogan, MaryContributeurauteur secondairetoutes les éditionsconfirmé
Satel, SallyContributeurauteur secondairetoutes les éditionsconfirmé
Slater, LaurenContributeurauteur secondairetoutes les éditionsconfirmé
Specter, MichaelContributeurauteur secondairetoutes les éditionsconfirmé
Talbot, MargaretContributeurauteur secondairetoutes les éditionsconfirmé
Taubes, GaryContributeurauteur secondairetoutes les éditionsconfirmé
Wade, NicholasContributeurauteur secondairetoutes les éditionsconfirmé
Weinberg, StevenContributeurauteur secondairetoutes les éditionsconfirmé

Appartient à la série

Vous devez vous identifier pour modifier le Partage des connaissances.
Pour plus d'aide, voir la page Aide sur le Partage des connaissances [en anglais].
Titre canonique
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
Titre original
Titres alternatifs
Date de première publication
Personnes ou personnages
Lieux importants
Évènements importants
Films connexes
Épigraphe
Dédicace
Premiers mots
Citations
Derniers mots
Notice de désambigüisation
Directeur de publication
Courtes éloges de critiques
Langue d'origine
DDC/MDS canonique
LCC canonique

Références à cette œuvre sur des ressources externes.

Wikipédia en anglais (3)

If, as Matt Ridley suggests, science is simply the search for new forms of ignorance, then perhaps it follows that with science's advances come new questions. Will human genetic engineering become commonplace? Will human cloning ever be safe? Are there many universes? How much will the climate change during the coming century? The Best American Science Writing 2002 gathers top writers and scientists covering the latest developments in the fastest-changing, farthest-reaching scientific fields, such as medicine, genetics, computer technology, evolutionary psychology, cutting-edge physics, and the environment. Among this year's selections: In "The Made-to-Order Savior," Lisa Belkin spotlights two desperate families seeking an unprecedented cure by a medically and ethically unprecedented means -- creating a genetically matched child. Margaret Talbot's "A Desire to Duplicate" reveals that the first human clone may very likely come from an entirely unexpected source, and sooner than we think. Michael Specter reports on the shock waves rippling through the field of neuroscience following the revolutionary discovery that adult brain cells might in fact regenerate ("Rethinking the Brain"). Christopher Dickey's "I Love My Glow Bunny" recounts with sly humor a peculiar episode in which genetic engineering and artistic culture collide. Natalie Angier draws an insightful contrast between suicide terrorists and rescue workers who risk their lives, and finds that sympathy and altruism have a definite place in the evolution of human nature, David Berlinski's "What Brings a World into Being?" ponders the idea of biology and physics as essentially digital technologies, exploring the mysteries encoded in the universe's smallest units, be they cells or quanta. Nicholas Wade shows how one of the most controversial books of the year, The Skeptical Environmentalist, by former Greenpeace member and self-described leftist Bjorn Lomborg, debunks some of the most cherished tenets of the environmental movement, suggesting that things are perhaps not as bad as we've been led to believe. And as a counterpoint, Darcy Frey's profile of George Divoky reveals a dedicated researcher whose love of birds and mystery leads to some sobering discoveries about global warming and forcefully reminds us of the unsung heroes of science: those who put in long hours, fill in small details, and take great trouble. In the end, the unanswered questions are what sustain scientific inquiry, open new frontiers of knowledge, and lead to new technologies and medical treatments. The Best American Science Writing 2002 is a series of exciting reports from science's front lines, where what we don't know is every bit as important as what we know.

Aucune description trouvée dans une bibliothèque

Description du livre
Résumé sous forme de haïku

Discussion en cours

Aucun

Couvertures populaires

Vos raccourcis

Genres

Classification décimale de Melvil (CDD)

808Literature By Topic Rhetoric and anthologies

Classification de la Bibliothèque du Congrès

Évaluation

Moyenne: (3.93)
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3 4
3.5
4 7
4.5 2
5 2

Est-ce vous ?

Devenez un(e) auteur LibraryThing.

 

À propos | Contact | LibraryThing.com | Respect de la vie privée et règles d'utilisation | Aide/FAQ | Blog | Boutique | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliothèques historiques | Critiques en avant-première | Partage des connaissances | 205,465,082 livres! | Barre supérieure: Toujours visible