AccueilGroupesDiscussionsPlusTendances
Site de recherche
Ce site utilise des cookies pour fournir nos services, optimiser les performances, pour les analyses, et (si vous n'êtes pas connecté) pour les publicités. En utilisant Librarything, vous reconnaissez avoir lu et compris nos conditions générales d'utilisation et de services. Votre utilisation du site et de ses services vaut acceptation de ces conditions et termes.

Résultats trouvés sur Google Books

Cliquer sur une vignette pour aller sur Google Books.

Chargement...

Washington at the Plow: The Founding Farmer and the Question of Slavery

par Bruce A. Ragsdale

MembresCritiquesPopularitéÉvaluation moyenneDiscussions
2111,061,710 (3)Aucun
Biography & Autobiography. History. Nonfiction. George Washington spent more of his working life farming than he did at war or in political office. For over forty years, he devoted himself to the improvement of agriculture. Washington at the Plow depicts the "first farmer of America" as a leading practitioner of the New Husbandry, a transatlantic movement that spearheaded advancements in crop rotation. A tireless experimentalist, Washington pulled up his tobacco and switched to wheat production, leading the way for the rest of the country. He filled his library with the latest agricultural treatises and pioneered land-management techniques that he hoped would guide small farmers, strengthen agrarian society, and ensure the prosperity of the nation. He saw enslaved field workers and artisans as means of agricultural development and tried repeatedly to adapt slave labor to new kinds of farming. But Washington eventually found that forced labor could not achieve the productivity he desired. His inability to reconcile ideals of scientific farming and rural order with race-based slavery led him to reconsider the traditional foundations of the Virginia plantation. As Bruce Ragsdale shows, it was the inefficacy of chattel slavery, as much as moral revulsion at the practice, that informed Washington's famous decision to free his slaves after his death.… (plus d'informations)
Aucun
Chargement...

Inscrivez-vous à LibraryThing pour découvrir si vous aimerez ce livre

Actuellement, il n'y a pas de discussions au sujet de ce livre.

This book covered SO MUCH about Washington’s plantations and farming that was just not covered in Chernow’s ‘definitive’ 800-page biography of Washington. (I read them at the same time, alternating to keep up with the chronology.) And Ragsdale manages to keep his narration sounding pretty neutral and unbiased, where Chernow does not.

‘Washington at the Plow’ is very thorough. VERY. This book is kindof like somebody went through all the primary sources (letters, journals, financial records etc.) and extracted every single thing that was farming-related (and related to his enslaved farm workers). I mean every single one. Every. One. (It feels like.) It’s a body of research, I mean. It’s a five-star collection of research. It’s a great source for people writing their final dissertation for a history degree. However. For the average bookstore browser who just has a hobby-level or idle interest in Washington… it’s a middle-satisfactory three-star read because - while it has no major faults - it’s too dry to be truly enjoyable. I think it’s about twice what you need. It’s a 400 page book and it would have been a lot more palatable (for this casual reader) if it were 200 pages. Probably half of every page could have been removed. (Unless you want the satisfaction of seeing every, every, every letter he wrote about crops and hedges.) So depending on what kind of reader you are, this is either a 5-star or a 3-star book.

….Unless you want practical, everyday, nuts-and-bolts antique farming information, such as what the normal practices were. That’s not here. It’s very much a history of what Washington SAID about farming, not a history of farming, or even an examination of how farming was carried out. The biggest example is that Washington keeps saying ‘improve agriculture’ and ‘American farmers don’t know how to farm’ but… why? What were they doing? Or what needed to be improved? Improvements like ‘drill plows’ and ‘honey locust trees’ are mentioned, but that means nothing unless you explain why those are different or better than whatever he already had. If you want to know how a plantation could be ‘self-sufficient,’ (a goal Washington talks about several times) this book doesn’t really tell you how that works. ( )
  Quollden | Jul 6, 2023 |
aucune critique | ajouter une critique
Vous devez vous identifier pour modifier le Partage des connaissances.
Pour plus d'aide, voir la page Aide sur le Partage des connaissances [en anglais].
Titre canonique
Titre original
Titres alternatifs
Date de première publication
Personnes ou personnages
Lieux importants
Évènements importants
Films connexes
Épigraphe
Dédicace
Premiers mots
Citations
Derniers mots
Notice de désambigüisation
Directeur de publication
Courtes éloges de critiques
Langue d'origine
DDC/MDS canonique
LCC canonique

Références à cette œuvre sur des ressources externes.

Wikipédia en anglais

Aucun

Biography & Autobiography. History. Nonfiction. George Washington spent more of his working life farming than he did at war or in political office. For over forty years, he devoted himself to the improvement of agriculture. Washington at the Plow depicts the "first farmer of America" as a leading practitioner of the New Husbandry, a transatlantic movement that spearheaded advancements in crop rotation. A tireless experimentalist, Washington pulled up his tobacco and switched to wheat production, leading the way for the rest of the country. He filled his library with the latest agricultural treatises and pioneered land-management techniques that he hoped would guide small farmers, strengthen agrarian society, and ensure the prosperity of the nation. He saw enslaved field workers and artisans as means of agricultural development and tried repeatedly to adapt slave labor to new kinds of farming. But Washington eventually found that forced labor could not achieve the productivity he desired. His inability to reconcile ideals of scientific farming and rural order with race-based slavery led him to reconsider the traditional foundations of the Virginia plantation. As Bruce Ragsdale shows, it was the inefficacy of chattel slavery, as much as moral revulsion at the practice, that informed Washington's famous decision to free his slaves after his death.

Aucune description trouvée dans une bibliothèque

Description du livre
Résumé sous forme de haïku

Discussion en cours

Aucun

Couvertures populaires

Vos raccourcis

Évaluation

Moyenne: (3)
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3 1
3.5
4
4.5
5

Est-ce vous ?

Devenez un(e) auteur LibraryThing.

 

À propos | Contact | LibraryThing.com | Respect de la vie privée et règles d'utilisation | Aide/FAQ | Blog | Boutique | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliothèques historiques | Critiques en avant-première | Partage des connaissances | 205,856,962 livres! | Barre supérieure: Toujours visible