AccueilGroupesDiscussionsPlusTendances
Site de recherche
Ce site utilise des cookies pour fournir nos services, optimiser les performances, pour les analyses, et (si vous n'êtes pas connecté) pour les publicités. En utilisant Librarything, vous reconnaissez avoir lu et compris nos conditions générales d'utilisation et de services. Votre utilisation du site et de ses services vaut acceptation de ces conditions et termes.

Résultats trouvés sur Google Books

Cliquer sur une vignette pour aller sur Google Books.

Chargement...

Jefferson Davis, Napoleonic France, and the Nature of Confederate Ideology, 1815-1870 (Conflicting Worlds: New Dimensions of the American Civil War)

par Jeffrey Zvengrowski

MembresCritiquesPopularitéÉvaluation moyenneMentions
512,982,911 (2)3
"In his highly innovative study of Confederate political theory, Jeffrey Zvengrowski explains the American Civil War in a new way by arguing that Jefferson Davis and the faction of Confederate leaders who supported him saw Bonapartist France as a model for the Confederate States of America. As such, they saw themselves as struggling not so much for slavery directly, but rather for equality among whites and for white supremacy. And they believed that they were fighting a Republican Party coalition that stood for inequality among whites by means of racial equality or racial equality by means of universal equality. This bloc of the Confederate leadership also wanted to build an industrial nation-state capable of waging Napoleonic warfare with large conscripted armies, and they insisted that state's rights did not mean states should inhibit the national government from exercising such delegated powers as building militarily useful infrastructure. They expected to receive support from many northern Democrats and the Bonapartists of Napoleon III's France, each of whom espoused white equality and supremacy even though they both disliked slavery as an institution more than pro-Davis Confederates. Anglophile anti-Davis Confederates, in contrast, advocated inequality among whites, favored radical state's rights inimical to energetic government at any level, and supported theories of slavery that were hostile to white rule without it. Preferring guerilla to Napoleonic warfare, they hoped to receive support from Britain by asserting that southern plantations were akin to romanticized British aristocratic estates; and that the Confederacy would happily become a de facto British agricultural colony"--… (plus d'informations)
Récemment ajouté parGoulooze, Shrike58, librookian
Aucun
Chargement...

Inscrivez-vous à LibraryThing pour découvrir si vous aimerez ce livre

Actuellement, il n'y a pas de discussions au sujet de ce livre.

» Voir aussi les 3 mentions

Ever since I noticed that this book was coming out I had been looking forward to reading it, because the influence of, in particular, the French Second Empire on American politics, seemed like it could be interesting. Having finally gotten around to reading this study, I'm here to tell you not to bother, unless you're writing an academic paper. As once you get past the "Introduction," which outlines the friction between the advanced version of the "White Male Jacksonian Republic," of which Jefferson Davis was an adherent of, and the Anglophile, extreme "State Rights" ideology of so many of his Confederate political opponents, this work doesn't impress me. It mostly feels like a grab-bag collection of anecdotes. Further, if you read this work aloud, the tone is that of a run-on drone.

I'll further add, that, there are what seems to be some very strange aspects to this book, which appears to be the published version of Zvengrowski's doctoral thesis. There is no real introduction to talk about his motivation and methodology, or why you should care about this study. There are no acknowledgments. These is no bibliography, which disguises what seems like a shallow dive in the secondary literature. Also, Zvengrowski can't be bothered to properly cite records from the U.S. National Archives. Finally, the only personalization one can find is a very curt dedication to the author's wife and kids in a rather small typeface. When you hunt down the man's capsule biography at the University of Virginia website, you'll notice that what he really appears to do is archival and library work, which raises the suspicion that the doctoral thesis was mostly written to fulfill a job prerequisite; that's fine. It still doesn't explain why the LSU Press published this work in the form it did; it certainly doesn't display any pride in ownership by Zvengrowski. ( )
  Shrike58 | Jul 23, 2022 |
aucune critique | ajouter une critique
Vous devez vous identifier pour modifier le Partage des connaissances.
Pour plus d'aide, voir la page Aide sur le Partage des connaissances [en anglais].
Titre canonique
Titre original
Titres alternatifs
Date de première publication
Personnes ou personnages
Lieux importants
Évènements importants
Films connexes
Épigraphe
Dédicace
Premiers mots
Citations
Derniers mots
Notice de désambigüisation
Directeur de publication
Courtes éloges de critiques
Langue d'origine
DDC/MDS canonique
LCC canonique

Références à cette œuvre sur des ressources externes.

Wikipédia en anglais

Aucun

"In his highly innovative study of Confederate political theory, Jeffrey Zvengrowski explains the American Civil War in a new way by arguing that Jefferson Davis and the faction of Confederate leaders who supported him saw Bonapartist France as a model for the Confederate States of America. As such, they saw themselves as struggling not so much for slavery directly, but rather for equality among whites and for white supremacy. And they believed that they were fighting a Republican Party coalition that stood for inequality among whites by means of racial equality or racial equality by means of universal equality. This bloc of the Confederate leadership also wanted to build an industrial nation-state capable of waging Napoleonic warfare with large conscripted armies, and they insisted that state's rights did not mean states should inhibit the national government from exercising such delegated powers as building militarily useful infrastructure. They expected to receive support from many northern Democrats and the Bonapartists of Napoleon III's France, each of whom espoused white equality and supremacy even though they both disliked slavery as an institution more than pro-Davis Confederates. Anglophile anti-Davis Confederates, in contrast, advocated inequality among whites, favored radical state's rights inimical to energetic government at any level, and supported theories of slavery that were hostile to white rule without it. Preferring guerilla to Napoleonic warfare, they hoped to receive support from Britain by asserting that southern plantations were akin to romanticized British aristocratic estates; and that the Confederacy would happily become a de facto British agricultural colony"--

Aucune description trouvée dans une bibliothèque

Description du livre
Résumé sous forme de haïku

Discussion en cours

Aucun

Couvertures populaires

Vos raccourcis

Évaluation

Moyenne: (2)
0.5
1
1.5
2 1
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5

Est-ce vous ?

Devenez un(e) auteur LibraryThing.

 

À propos | Contact | LibraryThing.com | Respect de la vie privée et règles d'utilisation | Aide/FAQ | Blog | Boutique | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliothèques historiques | Critiques en avant-première | Partage des connaissances | 205,890,218 livres! | Barre supérieure: Toujours visible