Antonio Damasio is simple even for a science background reader but its spetacular how he simplifies and clarifies every thing

PT- A ciência vista por este grande Doutor mesmo para quem tem background cientifico é bastante simplificada e clarificada .

Um livro que nos leva desde as tradicionais células procariotas até á integração do conteudo cerebral para a formação de tudo aquilo que conhecemos como cultural, brilhante e recomendável ( )

A thesis. I got bored. ( )

Homeostasis does the heavy lifting in Antonio Damasio’s account of life, subjectivity, consciousness, and culture. Not the homeostasis that your mom told you about, the one that describes the tendency towards a relatively stable equilibrium of independent elements. It’s that, of course, but it is also much more. For Damasio, homeostasis includes the notion of prevailing. Life, from its earliest beginnings, hasn’t been about maintaining the status quo, it’s been about prevailing. All life. From the tiniest bacteria to multi-talented mankind. This redefinition or realization (it could be either) underwrites Damasio’s claim to be setting the standard view of consciousness, subjectivity, even culture, on its head. Consciousness, it turns out, is as embedded in the basic homeostatic drives as is hunger or thirst or what have you. The order goes from the bottom up, not the top down.

Damasio is both a serious researcher and an accomplished writer on his scientific field of study. Much of this book is devoted to detailing the research by himself and others that support his view of homeostasis. Especially important in this regard is the fundamental contribution made by feelings. Feelings are not some flavouring added on to the dish of life. They are essential for homeostatic prevailing to succeed when life encounters a potentially hostile world. Damasio rightly notes the novelty of his position. If he’s right, philosophers and cognitive scientists have some hard thinking ahead.

Where Damasio’s story begins to fray is perhaps where it began. His initial inspiration for this book stemmed from reading Jean Genet’s account of creativity: “Beauty has no other origin but the singular wound, different for each person, hidden or visible.” Could homeostatic prevailing also explain human culture? Perhaps. Certainly if Damasio’s earlier story is close to accurate, there is no reason to think that homeostasis doesn’t underwrite culture. If it underwrites all aspects of life, that would follow. But does saying that get us anywhere? When something explains everything, it ends up not explaining much at all. To which the useful admonishment is — back to the rough ground.

Recommended. ( )

Give it a chance and this book will blow your mind. Or at least turn upside down then inside out everything you thought you knew about you, your self-awareness and the discipline you exercised over how your mind ranged around. Welcome aboard the most exciting and fascinating roller-coaster ride you are ever likely to encounter in book form. Except and it is a very reluctant except, hence the missing half-point, it is tediously and pedantically slow in many places and reiterative. But then an author possibly cannot win. Setting to out to explain state of the art thinking to the general lay reader, what background knowledge can you assume? How fast on the uptake should you expect?

The book takes us on a slow evolutionary journey as ever increasingly complex organisms develop and check new mutations that give them a survival competitive edge over other rival organisms. Collaboratively these various evolving functions, energy intake, circulation, waste disposal, reproduction and so on, work together to optimise the organism's survival, leading to this integrated functional brain. Keeping all these basic systems working together intune with each other. More evolution and this evolving organism develops senses to experience the world it now inhabits, these senses, such as touch, sight, sound, taste also have to work collaboratively together but they have to respond to the driving needs of the function brain, so the senses brain and the function brain have to communicate and assign priorities between them. Until finally the magic happens and the organism evolves to have a sense of place, of itself within the world it inhabits which evolves to a self-awareness and to this brain which we know and believe to be the essence of us. So this thesis reaches its conclusion that self-awareness led to feelings and then ultimately to culture. Culture which enabled our inheritance of this brain to devise this complex technological world we have created. Powerful stuff.

But not one nice neat brain that you have freewill control over to decided between competing rationale and outcomes but a three tiered brain working beneath your self-awareness that predetermines the available thoughts that you might then consciously juggle with to reach a thought conclusion. Master of your mind! No. Freewill to choose? No. Reliable and consistent recall? No. Creativity you alone stimulate? No. No. No.
You have and are what your collective brains select for your conscious mind, for you to work with! ( )

The closest I've read to a theory of life and everything in a while. Damasio demonstrates how feelings are mental representations of how close the inner environment of the viscera and the endocrine system is to the ideal of homeostasis. If the organism is in a state conducive to homeostasis then the feelings are of a pleasant nature. If far then of an unpleasant nature. The interesting thing is that the nature of emotion and affect in accompanying the regulation of homeostasis is new in terms of evolutionary time. Single celled bacteria don't have feelings, but they do exhibit many of the behaviours that our affect goes along with. Brilliant book - possibly revolutionary. ( )