Cliquer sur une vignette pour aller sur Google Books.
Chargement... Queer Domesticities: Homosexuality and Home Life in Twentieth-Century London (Genders and Sexualities in History)par M. Cook
Aucun Chargement...
Inscrivez-vous à LibraryThing pour découvrir si vous aimerez ce livre Actuellement, il n'y a pas de discussions au sujet de ce livre. aucune critique | ajouter une critique
Sissy home boys or domestic outlaws? Through a series of vivid case studies taken from across the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries, Matt Cook explores the emergence of these trenchant stereotypes and looks at how they play out in the home and family lives of queer men. Aucune description trouvée dans une bibliothèque |
Discussion en coursAucunCouvertures populaires
Google Books — Chargement... GenresClassification décimale de Melvil (CDD)306.84Social sciences Social Sciences; Sociology and anthropology Culture and Institutions Marriage and Parenting Non-traditional familiesClassification de la Bibliothèque du CongrèsÉvaluationMoyenne:
Est-ce vous ?Devenez un(e) auteur LibraryThing. |
This is an academic review that uses a range of case studies to support the author’s observations about queer male life in 20th century London. Matt Cook’s observations are, in my experience, sound and thoughtful, but it’s the pictures of queer homes and households that are particularly interesting.
Cook starts with the elite home of two late Victorian/Edwardian men who turned their home into a place of unique taste and refinement, a demonstration, as Cook says, of their self-perceived sophistication and superiority. Their home is a tangible expression of their distinctness from the common taste while also normalizing their queerness. This is something that my partner and I reflect in our own home decorating choices, though unconsciously until reading this book. But yes, we strive for a demonstration of artistic good taste both as a statement of our superiority and normalcy. Until Cook put it into words, I had not considered that principle, but now it’s hard to deny it.
Cook’s observations about birth families and chosen families are equally telling, although like most gay men I’m much more aware of this in my life. The men in Cook’s case studies negotiate (in his academic language) complex relations with family members and others, sometimes bringing them closer, sometimes less close, but never severing relations entirely. It’s almost comical to think of the most radical and outrageous men of the latter part of the 20th century, like Joe Orton or Derek Jarman, going back to the parents’ home for the holidays, and reverting to their old family names and roles. Again, this is something that I and many other gay men can understand. While we want to create our own type of family and relationships, there is a state that shifts between comfort and discomfort when we enter the family home. Equally important is negotiating relationships with friends, both gay and not, changing over time as a form of chosen family, who may or may not be sexually involved, but may be part of an emotional and physical support network.
Fascinating to me, although not so much part of my direct experience, is the shift from “bedsitterland” to the queer squats and GLF. While both are specific to particular times and places in London, there are still elements that I feel I can relate to. Living in what used to be Vancouver’s queer ghetto, the idea of a densely populated neighbourhood where a marginalized population finds community in affordable, if substandard, housing seems quite natural, even desirable. I lived here in a housekeeping room as a student, and still love the sense of a shared village within a bigger city. We don’t have squats, but friends have lived in co-op housing, and negotiated the kind of personal space that Cook describes – although not as radical in their personal politics as the queer squats and GLF houses. And like London, we are losing our village to rising property costs. In all of this, we felt, and sometimes articulated, the need for community, security and identity that Cook draws out in his observations and analysis.
Cook draws on a wide range of cases to make his observations. Many of them I was vaguely aware of, such as the GLF co-ops, and the lives of high-profile queers like Orton and Jarman. But the personal detail of how they lived their lives makes those stories much more real, and humanizes them by showing points that are similar to my own life. This is a wonderful survey of queer life, and makes me feel part of a larger queer community. Now I want to read more of Cook’s research. ( )