An interesting book, with six interesting hoaxes, though some are better than others.

Ch. 1: A decent recapitulation of the Mark Hoffman case, with a focus on the "Oath of a Freeman," not his Mormon forgeries. Pretty good, though.
Ch. 2: The chapter focuses on some supposed transcripts of a conversation between Churchill and FDR that did not happen: they were a hoax. What is left undone is a thorough rebuttal of the conspiracy theory based on the facts that are facts. This is better done elsewhere.
Ch. 3: A nice retelling of the Hitler Diaries hoax.
Ch. 4: A skeptical account of the Shroud of Turin, with some evidence I haven't heard before. A Dr. McCrone says the "blood" isn't blood? I've always read that it is blood? The Catholic Church traced down the forger in the 1300s? Here the skeptic takes a Church document rather unskeptically. Most Shroud researchers believe that we have references to the shroud going back before it pops up in France. It is good to see an account of a Shroud skeptic, since most Shroud books are pro it being an authentic relic. Steers relies quite heavily on his foreword writer Nickell's work here.
Ch. 5: The Piltdown Man hoax is told here, with the blame falling squarely on Dawson, who probably forged other artifacts. Fine. But Steers seems to believe that the hoax was accepted for nationalistic reasons: Brits were racist jingos who wanted an "ancestor" of their own back in the human family tree. Steers doesn't seem to consider that scientists might have wanted a missing link because they wanted to prove Darwinistic evolution. Scientists (it is repeated again and again that Dawson was an amateur) can't have sinister motives, can they?
Ch. 6: Steers focuses on the missing pages from the John Wilkes Booth diary. This is Steers's area of expertise (he is a scholar of the Lincoln assassination) and he demolishes several conspiracy theories about Stanton and Booth, etc. He makes a good stab at showing that the pages were probably already torn from the diary when taken off Booth, not after it got to Stanton. (Though, to be fair, we know some pages were torn out for notes. But could some have been torn out after the diary got to Stanton? Sure. We have no way of proving that one way or the other.)

All-in-all, a good book. But it has the underlying aura trying to show that BELIEF is what contaminates right thinking. Perhaps I am trying too hard to dislike an aspect of this book, but something about it seemed condescending and I can't quite put a finger on it.

Images, notes, suggested readings. ( )

Hoax: Hitler’s Diaries, Lincoln’s Assassins, and Other Famous Frauds by Edward Steers Jr.
209 pages

★★ ½

This book is pretty self explanatory. It delves into some famous hoaxes – how they came to be, the people behind it, the discovery, the consequences.

I wish I could give this book a better rating. It had interesting stories (it goes into 6 instances of hoaxes in recent times) but somewhere along the line I just got bored. It just became the same thing, a different artifact but the same story mostly – someone forged something, people believed it, people paid lots of money, item turns out to be fake, people are sad. I pretty much perused my way through those last 20 pages, just not really caring anymore. The research was well done but I felt at times that the book came across in a textbook style, so very boring – I did that enough in college, thank you very much. There also black and white photos throughout. The pictures had promise but many were blurry and out of focus. What was the point of putting those pictures in? Seems like if you can’t find a good one, just don’t bother. Started out strong but just became too much for me. I should be thankful this book was just a little over 200 pages. That took me long enough for me to read. Not bad but ready to move on to something else, and quickly.
( )