AccueilGroupesDiscussionsPlusTendances
Site de recherche
Ce site utilise des cookies pour fournir nos services, optimiser les performances, pour les analyses, et (si vous n'êtes pas connecté) pour les publicités. En utilisant Librarything, vous reconnaissez avoir lu et compris nos conditions générales d'utilisation et de services. Votre utilisation du site et de ses services vaut acceptation de ces conditions et termes.

Résultats trouvés sur Google Books

Cliquer sur une vignette pour aller sur Google Books.

Chargement...

Cosmic Apprentice: Dispatches from the Edges of Science

par Dorion Sagan

MembresCritiquesPopularitéÉvaluation moyenneMentions
382651,349 (4.08)6
Refreshingly nonconformist and polemically incisive, Cosmic Apprentice challenges readers to reject both dogma and cliche and instead recover the intellectual adventurousness that should-and can once again-animate both science and philosophy. Informed by a countercultural sensibility, a deep engagement with speculative thought, and a hardheaded scientific skepticism, it advances controversial positions on such seemingly sacrosanct subjects as evolution and entropy.… (plus d'informations)
Aucun
Chargement...

Inscrivez-vous à LibraryThing pour découvrir si vous aimerez ce livre

Actuellement, il n'y a pas de discussions au sujet de ce livre.

» Voir aussi les 6 mentions

2 sur 2
Dorion Sagan’s Cosmic Apprentice is a scientific mugging. He takes everything you think you know about science and turns it on its head, tying together classic observations and modern revelations in such a way as to make ensure that you will question everything. He scoops up the whole world of modern science, including hallucinogenic research, bacterial genomics, the significance of dust, and the nature of scientific revolutions, squeezes them for all they’re worth.

Sagan’s mission is to show that everything is simultaneously connected and questionable. He focuses his time on scientists conducting research far outside the mainstream. These people are not kooks per se, but they are definitely not your run-of-the-mill pipette-wielding chemists or biologists. They are seeking to integrate whole systems of thought, systems that range from the microscopic to the cosmologic. He quotes research from far too many people to count.

There’s also a lot of cognitive science in here as well. How do we think about discovery? About failure? About thinking itself? These are both neurological and philosophic questions. An interesting motif that recurs in the chapters, however, is the notion of the free will in a world of interconnected systems. Given that everything in the universe is the result of billions of years of motion and reaction, what makes humanity so special that it doesn’t have to obey these laws? Each one of us may believe that we are unique and autonomous, but we are subject to the same processes that govern the ocean or the ant colony. We are at the mercy of our chemicals and invading bacteria. The feature that supposedly separates us from the rest of the universe is our self-perception. The problem occurs when we try to devise a test to prove or disprove free will.

It’s these intersections of science and philosophy that make this interesting. Sagan eagerly demonstrates ability to synthesize, or at least correlate, information from very disparate fields of study. This book is like reading Bill Bryson on acid. I liked it a lot, but next time, I’ll read it much slower. It’s just a lot to take in at once. If you have the stomach and can handle the ride, though. this one is well worth it. ( )
1 voter NielsenGW | May 1, 2013 |
You enter Cosmic Apprentice as you would enter a new world. It is mysterious, unpredictable and unlimited. The words they use there could be a foreign language. Come in with an open mind.

The topics Sagan covers range from dust, to methane, to sex, to science as religion, to free will, to philosophy, to psychiatry, to ecodelic drugs. But they have a(n unexpected) common underpinning: their connection to the second law of thermodynamics. And in the end, it is clear that the point of it all is that we, humans on Earth, are a process more than a thing (Buckminster Fuller said we are verbs, not nouns). Our role is to keep the energy gradients from dispersing and spreading to the dreaded, boring state of equilibrium, which means nothing at all is happening. We do that by working, eating, participating at any sort of level. Unfortunately we also do it by unexpectedly burning every carbon resource on the planet, which is problematic not only for the second law, but also for the future of the species. It takes us way beyond our punching weight in the scheme of things, causing an overheated system. And overheated systems burn out or up or both. The planet has its own immune system, and can deal us out of the scheme in an instant if we don’t behave like the guests we are here. Keeping the entropy gradients down is our mission and our role, and we fulfill it whether we know it or not, choose to or not, or avoid it or not. Free will exists because it has no choice.

Along the way, we learn some truly amazing things. Two notables:

The body is not one self but a fiction of a self built from a mass of interacting, supervening selves. A body’s capabilities are literally the result of what it incorporates; the self is not merely corporal but corporate. Life is modular; it assembles what it needs from available resources. Our immune system is not so much to keep bacteria out as to actively select which ones to subsume and incorporate for the benefits they offer. That above all is the true way of nature, evolution and the history of life. Survival goes to those (tiny) beings that offer the most benefit to their hosts. Bacteria are the longstanding champions of evolution. Helpfulness is what makes them the fittest, not necessarily their ability to outrun, outlast or fight.

The other notable is the travails of J Marvin Herndon, who put together a comprehensive, complete and most of all elegant alternate history of the planet. Actually it’s worse than that. Herndon has actually disproven the currently accepted story, and posited a much stronger, consistent one. In his theory, Earth was a gas giant like Jupiter, 300 times its current size. In the ignition of the sun, the gas envelope around Earth was blown away. Ever since, the planet has been decompressing, causing rifts, earthquakes and tectonic plate shifting as it stretches out and relaxes. The pressure of the enormous gas cloud had reduced Earth to 64% of its current size. And it continues to swell. The core of the planet is a solid furnace of uranium in nickel silicate, that generates our magnetic field from within. That’s why the sun can blow it back, but can’t blow it away. Its inconsistencies are why magnetic poles shift. Herndon has a total package that works without fail and actually makes sense, even to the layman. For his efforts, he has of course been pilloried, blasted, minimized, dismissed and ignored, much as any good Copernicus, Bruno or Darwin before him. The religion that is science is not much more welcoming than the religions of exclusive faith.

Sagan is a passionate polymath, and it’s a pleasure to see his mind in action, but the book is not a particularly easy read. He chocks it full of names you never heard of, without further explanation, and creates compound words of his own that slow you down. He delights in making people’s names into adjectives. The endnotes are rich with additional information, which is a bother, but make it worth keeping your thumb in the back of the book. We’re not all astrophysicists or biochemists, but Sagan writes as if we were, which makes it hard slogging at times. Syntax is sometimes clumsy: “Plato’s watchers thus are to be found largely only in the ranks of scientists themselves or, in academia, philosophers of science who tend to be marginalized within science.” Another I had trouble following turned out to be nine lines long when it mercifully ended. The chapter on mind altering drugs was enlightenting, but will aggravate and annoy a segment of the reading public who just say no to drugs without examining or wanting to understand their potential – and won’t expect it in a book like this.

So Cosmic Apprentice is not for everybody, but if you’re open to the challenge, it’s a great ride. ( )
1 voter DavidWineberg | Apr 9, 2013 |
2 sur 2
aucune critique | ajouter une critique
Vous devez vous identifier pour modifier le Partage des connaissances.
Pour plus d'aide, voir la page Aide sur le Partage des connaissances [en anglais].
Titre canonique
Titre original
Titres alternatifs
Date de première publication
Personnes ou personnages
Lieux importants
Évènements importants
Films connexes
Épigraphe
Dédicace
Premiers mots
Citations
Derniers mots
Notice de désambigüisation
Directeur de publication
Courtes éloges de critiques
Langue d'origine
DDC/MDS canonique
LCC canonique

Références à cette œuvre sur des ressources externes.

Wikipédia en anglais (2)

Refreshingly nonconformist and polemically incisive, Cosmic Apprentice challenges readers to reject both dogma and cliche and instead recover the intellectual adventurousness that should-and can once again-animate both science and philosophy. Informed by a countercultural sensibility, a deep engagement with speculative thought, and a hardheaded scientific skepticism, it advances controversial positions on such seemingly sacrosanct subjects as evolution and entropy.

Aucune description trouvée dans une bibliothèque

Description du livre
Résumé sous forme de haïku

Discussion en cours

Aucun

Couvertures populaires

Vos raccourcis

Évaluation

Moyenne: (4.08)
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3 1
3.5 1
4 2
4.5
5 2

Est-ce vous ?

Devenez un(e) auteur LibraryThing.

 

À propos | Contact | LibraryThing.com | Respect de la vie privée et règles d'utilisation | Aide/FAQ | Blog | Boutique | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliothèques historiques | Critiques en avant-première | Partage des connaissances | 205,091,866 livres! | Barre supérieure: Toujours visible