Cliquer sur une vignette pour aller sur Google Books.
Chargement... Theology of the Pain of God: The First Original Theology from Japanpar Kazoh Kitamori
Aucun Chargement...
Inscrivez-vous à LibraryThing pour découvrir si vous aimerez ce livre Actuellement, il n'y a pas de discussions au sujet de ce livre. Kitamore expounds on the inner divine attitude towards sinners with Jeremiah 31:20 as the focal point; he sees the pain of God as the heart of the Gospel message (p.19). The Cross is where the pain of God is revealed to the eyes of sinful mankind. What is this “pain of God”? Kitamore contends it “reflects his will to love the objects of his wrath…God himself was broken, wounded and suffered because he embraced those who should not be embraced” (p.21,22). God’s love is rooted in this pain. This is a profound and fascinating read. The depth, which it brings to the subject, will bring to clearer light – to the one who would meditatively read it – the truly Biblical teaching regarding God’s attitude towards sinful mankind and how that love is supremely revealed at the Cross of Jesus Christ. This is not an everyday, normal, surface reading of how God feels. Kitamore is able to reconcile how the Cross is both a revelation of God’s wrath and God’s love for men in a way I have never heard explained and does so in a clear, yet penetrating manner. Years before reading this book, I myself have come to believe that God’s love for man as created and his hatred for men as sinful was revealed at the Cross but was unable to reconcile these diametrically opposed and exclusive feelings and articulate how these diametrically opposed feeling, which seemed to exclude each other, were met at the Cross until now. This book helped to resolve for me the perplexing issue of God’s inner attitude – his feelings of love and hate for mankind – and how it converges at the Cross. aucune critique | ajouter une critique
Until the twentieth century, the Western world formulated most Christian theology. Fully grounded in this tradition, Kazoh Kitamori demonstrates its limitations and problems from a Japanese point of view and suggests a fresh approach to the biblical message. Dr. Katamori has developed the first original theology from the East. The gospel is the gospel of the cross, he says. God loves the objects of his wrath. What is revealed in the cross is neither the wrath of God alone nor the love of God alone, but the synthesis of the two. The author's purpose is to clarify this synthesis, identified as the pain of God. By the theology of the pain of God, he means the theology of love rooted in the pain of God. He brings a new interpretation to this central theme of the Christian faith. Today, Christian thinkers are calling for an ecumenical theology. By helping to renew the faith even as he seeks to reformulate it in non-Western terms, Dr. Kitamori takes an important step toward expanding the dialogue between Christians of the East and West. Aucune description trouvée dans une bibliothèque |
Discussion en coursAucun
Google Books — Chargement... GenresClassification décimale de Melvil (CDD)231Religions Christian doctrinal theology God; Unity; TrinityClassification de la Bibliothèque du CongrèsÉvaluationMoyenne:
Est-ce vous ?Devenez un(e) auteur LibraryThing. |
Perhaps this notion of a feeling, triune God was unfamiliar, new and dangerous to a Japanese audience. Of course since the 1960s Moltmann has made it central to a European theological milieu. But the challenge of communicating a passionate God to a realm in which gods are impervious to feeling is hardly a new one - it was the very risque business undertaken by all Christians, Gentile and Jewish, as they took the theology of the cross into a Roman world.
So, sadly, Kitamori convinces me of nothing. Over and again the notion of the pain of God is returned to, yet I never feel that humanity is to benefit particularly from this pain, or that some sort of soteriological benefit stems from this pain. God hurts. I get that - and admit it must have been powerfully challenging in Japan in 1942. But there is a "so what" dimension missing. God hurts. So let it be. ( )