Daniel Seward

This is a short piece, more an essay than a book, at 27 pages.
The key point the author makes is that all traditional philosophies have shortcomings and paradoxes. His solution is to integrate the tenets of your favoured philosophy with its negative counterparts to produce a more sustainable and logical whole. This is a conclusion that the author has arrived at after much thought and makes some sense.
May I suggest that his argument would be more powerful if there were more detailed examples of integration in part 1 and if the author’s story in part 3 was written more around the integration theme.
Nevertheless, kudos to the author for sharing his thoughts.… (plus d'informations)

Overall, this is an easy to read novel that will entertain readers not expecting to become immersed in the plot. While some of the dialogue is engaging, there is a lack of emotion in the characters' demeanor and little personal reaction to their situations. For example, could Sonya feel the rope bruising her fingers as she rode the bronc? Did she press her heels against his withers when the horse reared and twisted? Even after the death of someone she loved, she barely reacted. Instead of describing the drama, the author simply tells the story which comes across as just the facts.… (plus d'informations)