AccueilGroupesDiscussionsPlusTendances
Site de recherche
Ce site utilise des cookies pour fournir nos services, optimiser les performances, pour les analyses, et (si vous n'êtes pas connecté) pour les publicités. En utilisant Librarything, vous reconnaissez avoir lu et compris nos conditions générales d'utilisation et de services. Votre utilisation du site et de ses services vaut acceptation de ces conditions et termes.

Résultats trouvés sur Google Books

Cliquer sur une vignette pour aller sur Google Books.

Chargement...

The Imagination of an Insurrection: Dublin, Easter 1916

par William Irwin Thompson

MembresCritiquesPopularitéÉvaluation moyenneMentions
492525,717 (4)1
We know from our literary histories that there was a movement called the Irish Literary Renaissance, and that Yeats was at its head. We know from our political histories that there is now a Republic of Ireland because of a nationalistic movement that, militarily, began with the insurrection of Easter Week, 1916. But what do these two movements have to do with one another'... Because I came to history with literary eyes, I could not help seeing history in terms and shapes of imaginative experience. Thus Movement, Myth, and Image came to be the way in which the nature of the insurrection appeared to me. This method of analyzing historical event as if it were a work of art is not altogether as inappropriate as it might seem when the historical event happens to be a revolution. The Irish revolutionaries lived as if they were in a work of art, and this inability to tell the difference between sober reality and the realm of imagination is perhaps one very important characteristic of a revolutionary. The tragedy of actuality comes from the fact that when, in a revolution, history is made momentarily into a work of art, human beings become the material that must be ordered, molded, or twisted into shape. (from the preface)… (plus d'informations)
Aucun
Chargement...

Inscrivez-vous à LibraryThing pour découvrir si vous aimerez ce livre

Actuellement, il n'y a pas de discussions au sujet de ce livre.

» Voir aussi la mention 1

2 sur 2
2/9/23
  laplantelibrary | Feb 9, 2023 |
From the Easter Rebellion reading program, despite it not being really about the Eastern Rebellion. Instead, it’s about the poetic and literary inspiration behind the Eastern Rebellion, attempting to explain how a bunch of poets and political theorists found themselves defending the Dublin Post Office against the British Army. Quite good although quaintly dated (published 1967). The quaint part is scattered through the text, where Thompson, from the vantage point of 1967, explains how the Irish struggle and the deaths of the Easter rebels somehow prefigures the eventual triumph of the State. OTOH, the biographies of the participants really do resonate dimly today; young men, underemployed for their education and sexually repressed by their religious beliefs engage in an almost deliberately incompetent suicidal act; he also makes the observation that revolutions take place not when repression is worse, but just when things are starting to get better, and is generally not led by the lowest strata of society but (in his words) “the bottom of the top and the top of the bottom”. Thus Thompson really was a prophet although he didn’t realize what he was prophesying.


Thompson starts with a background to the events, going back about 50 years or so, and explaining how various national, literary, language and agricultural reform movements coalesced into a military rebellion. His short explanation of how the House of Lords lost its veto power over Home Rule and the subsequent conservative backlash (“playing the Orange card”) cleared up a lot of things for me.


Thompson then segues into capsule biographies of the major participants at the Post Office. Their poetry is uninspired (well, it’s better than anything I could possibly write, though). It’s William Butler Yeats, who didn’t have any part in the rising, who has the creepiest stanzas:


All that I have done and said

Now that I am old and ill

Turns into a question till

I lie awake night after night

And never get the answers right
Did that play of mine send out

Certain men the English shot?


Yeats is thinking of his play Cathleen Ni Houlihan and wondering whether it did inspire people to go out and die for Ireland. Perhaps; art sometimes does have that power. Pearse, in particular, was famous for bloodthirsty speeches – Thompson cites one in particular with the chilling lines:

“We may make mistakes in the beginning and shoot the wrong people; but bloodshed is a cleansing and sanctifying thing, and the nation that regards it as the final horror has lost its manhood.”


Four years later Lieutenant-Colonel Ferguson-Smith gave the following advice to the Royal Irish Constabulary (the Black and Tans):


“You may make mistakes occasionally and innocent persons may be shot, but that cannot be helped, and you are bound to get the right parties sometime.”


Padraic Pearse was executed by firing squad for his part in the Easter Rising on May 3, 1916; Ferguson-Smith was assassinated in his club in 1920, shortly after making the statement above.


Like all the histories of the Easter Rising I’ve read, Thomson gives the rebels all the print; there’s no mention of the British soldiers killed, or of the fact that more Dublin civilians were killed than rebels and British combined. He does suggest that the firing-squad execution of the rising leaders was a mistake on the part of the British; it turned them from fanatics who had devastated Dublin in what was essentially a terrorist act to martyrs for the cause of Irish independence. Thompson suggests the correct strategy on the part of the British would have been a formal trial; the defendants would have looked ridiculous and ridicule is crushing to revolutionaries. The executions allowed Michael Collins, released later in 1916, lead what was essentially the world’s first terrorist campaign (and, so far, the only successful one) which culminated in Irish independence (Collins, of course, was later killed himself. There was a lot of that going around in Ireland).


Interesting; inspires me to go out and read more of Yeats, Synge, O’Casey and the other Irish writers of the time. ( )
  setnahkt | Dec 25, 2017 |
2 sur 2
aucune critique | ajouter une critique
Vous devez vous identifier pour modifier le Partage des connaissances.
Pour plus d'aide, voir la page Aide sur le Partage des connaissances [en anglais].
Titre canonique
Titre original
Titres alternatifs
Date de première publication
Personnes ou personnages
Lieux importants
Évènements importants
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
Films connexes
Épigraphe
Dédicace
Premiers mots
Citations
Derniers mots
Notice de désambigüisation
Directeur de publication
Courtes éloges de critiques
Langue d'origine
DDC/MDS canonique
LCC canonique

Références à cette œuvre sur des ressources externes.

Wikipédia en anglais

Aucun

We know from our literary histories that there was a movement called the Irish Literary Renaissance, and that Yeats was at its head. We know from our political histories that there is now a Republic of Ireland because of a nationalistic movement that, militarily, began with the insurrection of Easter Week, 1916. But what do these two movements have to do with one another'... Because I came to history with literary eyes, I could not help seeing history in terms and shapes of imaginative experience. Thus Movement, Myth, and Image came to be the way in which the nature of the insurrection appeared to me. This method of analyzing historical event as if it were a work of art is not altogether as inappropriate as it might seem when the historical event happens to be a revolution. The Irish revolutionaries lived as if they were in a work of art, and this inability to tell the difference between sober reality and the realm of imagination is perhaps one very important characteristic of a revolutionary. The tragedy of actuality comes from the fact that when, in a revolution, history is made momentarily into a work of art, human beings become the material that must be ordered, molded, or twisted into shape. (from the preface)

Aucune description trouvée dans une bibliothèque

Description du livre
Résumé sous forme de haïku

Discussion en cours

Aucun

Couvertures populaires

Vos raccourcis

Évaluation

Moyenne: (4)
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3 1
3.5
4 2
4.5
5 1

Est-ce vous ?

Devenez un(e) auteur LibraryThing.

 

À propos | Contact | LibraryThing.com | Respect de la vie privée et règles d'utilisation | Aide/FAQ | Blog | Boutique | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliothèques historiques | Critiques en avant-première | Partage des connaissances | 206,408,902 livres! | Barre supérieure: Toujours visible