I usually like Victorian and turn of the century adventures and mysteries, but this one left me cold. Having two central conceits that my 21st century self found totally unbelievable (mesmerism AND "twins who feel each others pain even when separated") just pushed me too far out of the story. ( )

A book students of the mystery genre will want to read, but not a novel I'd recommend to the average reader. ( )

An interesting book. From the blurb it is one of the first 'detective' novels, although the sleuth in the book is an insurace investigator. Some proasic language that takes a bit of getting used to (it was written in 1865). Took a while to get into as the format is not a straight story, but an accumulation of documents and statements from witnesses. Overall an interesting book and good early example of the genre. Clearly some of the concepts (mesmerism) and language are dated, but gives a great authenticity. I would say 'give it a read' but probably only if you really a crime fiction fan. If this is your first forasy into crime fiction it may dissuade you from further examples of the genre. ( )

Considered the first mystery novel, the story is pushing the boundaries of the genre with a plot that is both very Victorian and very far-fetched, with an objective but very determined narrator who goes to great lengths to solve a puzzle that would not have been seen by many others.

The Notting Hill Mystery by Charles Warren Adams is a 2015 British Crime Library publication. (Originally published in 1862)

Groundbreaking British Mystery!

Ralph Henderson is an insurance investigator who carefully lays out a solid case of insurance fraud and murder. Much like a police detective would, he uses good old -fashioned shoe leather to conduct interviews and gather evidence. Then, he presents his case in writing, almost like a lawyer would a jury.

The details are fascinating, if a bit melodramatic. The Baron R is the prime suspect and poisoning appears to be his modus operandi… that and his talents as a mesmerist. There are few surprising twists before all is said and done, keeping things interesting- if a bit far-fetched.

The modern reader would probably pan this book today. Some un-PC threads, (a kidnapping by a band of ‘Gypsies’), and implausible plot devices, might turn some readers off today.

Other than that, what makes this book stand out, like the synopsis states, is that it is believed to be the first full length detective novel. The book could also technically pass as an inverted mystery, as it is clear right from the get-go who the murderer is. The reader remains interested because they want to see how the murderers were committed. I think this book does set a standard for the future of mystery novels and for that reason, I think mystery lovers might find this book of interest.

It is also Henderson’s presentation of the facts that kept me invested in the story. It would have been nice to see him return in subsequent installments, to see his character fleshed out a bit, because he is quite good at his job. I found myself wondering about his looks, his private life, etc.

This one is worth checking out for its historical value and contribution to crime fiction. The British Crime Library has a nice selection of these classic mysteries available in digital format. I’m looking forward to exploring more of them this year! ( )