AccueilGroupesDiscussionsPlusTendances
Site de recherche
Ce site utilise des cookies pour fournir nos services, optimiser les performances, pour les analyses, et (si vous n'êtes pas connecté) pour les publicités. En utilisant Librarything, vous reconnaissez avoir lu et compris nos conditions générales d'utilisation et de services. Votre utilisation du site et de ses services vaut acceptation de ces conditions et termes.

Résultats trouvés sur Google Books

Cliquer sur une vignette pour aller sur Google Books.

Chargement...

Master Art Forger: The Story of Han van Meegeren (1951)

par Baron John Raymond Godley Kilbracken

MembresCritiquesPopularitéÉvaluation moyenneDiscussions
371671,785 (3.38)Aucun
Récemment ajouté parmma_lib, cleanmac, lipi, weird_O, motherraccoon, cns1000, Giamba
Bibliothèques historiquesWilliam Gaddis
Aucun
Chargement...

Inscrivez-vous à LibraryThing pour découvrir si vous aimerez ce livre

Actuellement, il n'y a pas de discussions au sujet de ce livre.

For years now it has surprised me that the work by Dutch forger Han van Meegeren is still discussed and talked about is if it represents high quality paintings by Vermeer. Sure, one of the paintings was sold to Herman Goering, but I think that says more about the buyer than the seller. Besides this book I saw another brief documentary come by on ArtBabble in which the Dutch museum Boijmans Van Beuningen proudly displayed their poor quality paintings by Van Meegeren. They show both real Vermeers and forged ones. In this book the author goes into the history of Van Meegeren's exploits and shows some more of his Vermeer's forgeries. Each forgery clearly looks like the specific style of Van Meegeren, not Vermeer.

It is very difficult to believe that anyone would be fooled by these fake Vermeers. There is nothing in the paintings that reminds us of the colour choice, lighting design, composition and anything else we associate with Vermeer. Even anyone who is shown a number of real Vermeers and then shown this one will say: are you sure this one was painted by the same person?

If you look at Van Meegeren's earlier drawings and paintings you can see a clear unique style that is also evident in this work, something the author of this book shows but not links to the quality of the later forged paintings. The most striking feature of Van Meegeren is his inability to paint or draw faces. Anyone he painted looks and feels the same. There are no facial lines, no definition or tone and nothing that makes his faces even stand out amongst each other.

Surprisingly the author of this book has the clear opinion that the forgeries were of high quality when he mentions: "Van Meegeren displayed extraordinary skill on the technical side, even for him, in The Drinkers. The paint structure was more complex than in any other of his forgeries: there were six separate paint layers." From this we can learn that the forgeries were mostly judged on a chemical level and not an aesthetic or paint technical one, something anyone should be able to do without difficulty.

As a historical work describing the life of Van Meegeren this work is excellent. As a demonstration of the quality of the forgeries it is slim at best with mostly chemical details and not paint technical details. ( )
  TheCriticalTimes | Oct 13, 2010 |
aucune critique | ajouter une critique
Vous devez vous identifier pour modifier le Partage des connaissances.
Pour plus d'aide, voir la page Aide sur le Partage des connaissances [en anglais].
Titre canonique
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
Titre original
Titres alternatifs
Date de première publication
Personnes ou personnages
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
Lieux importants
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
Évènements importants
Films connexes
Épigraphe
Dédicace
Premiers mots
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
In October, 1947, a grey-haired artist stood before the District Assize Court in Amsterdam; by his own confession, he had painted a series of eight pictures which were sold for over $2,250,000 as the work of Vermeer and de Hooch.
Citations
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
"Besides, the least important part of any picture has become the most important: the signature is the shibboleth by which all is judged.  What matters most is that it should be known beforehand if a picture has been painted by a fashionable artist.  Is not all the evidence exactly in this direction?   If a picture is sold for a fortune, in the belief that it is by a great artist, and if then it is learned that it's by that artist's apprentice, then its value in the market dwindles to a hundredth.  Yet is it not the same picture?  Does it not afford the same delight?   What else is the criterion by which its value can be judged?"  p. 197
Derniers mots
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
(Cliquez pour voir. Attention : peut vendre la mèche.)
Notice de désambigüisation
Directeur de publication
Courtes éloges de critiques
Langue d'origine
DDC/MDS canonique
LCC canonique

Références à cette œuvre sur des ressources externes.

Wikipédia en anglais (1)

Aucune description trouvée dans une bibliothèque

Description du livre
Résumé sous forme de haïku

Discussion en cours

Aucun

Couvertures populaires

Vos raccourcis

Évaluation

Moyenne: (3.38)
0.5
1
1.5
2 1
2.5
3 1
3.5
4 1
4.5 1
5

Est-ce vous ?

Devenez un(e) auteur LibraryThing.

 

À propos | Contact | LibraryThing.com | Respect de la vie privée et règles d'utilisation | Aide/FAQ | Blog | Boutique | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliothèques historiques | Critiques en avant-première | Partage des connaissances | 207,109,735 livres! | Barre supérieure: Toujours visible