AccueilGroupesDiscussionsPlusTendances
Site de recherche
Ce site utilise des cookies pour fournir nos services, optimiser les performances, pour les analyses, et (si vous n'êtes pas connecté) pour les publicités. En utilisant Librarything, vous reconnaissez avoir lu et compris nos conditions générales d'utilisation et de services. Votre utilisation du site et de ses services vaut acceptation de ces conditions et termes.

Résultats trouvés sur Google Books

Cliquer sur une vignette pour aller sur Google Books.

Chargement...

Sick, Sick, Sick: A Guide to Non-Confident Living (1958)

par Jules Feiffer

Autres auteurs: Voir la section autres auteur(e)s.

MembresCritiquesPopularitéÉvaluation moyenneMentions
1154239,197 (4.5)1
Aucun
Chargement...

Inscrivez-vous à LibraryThing pour découvrir si vous aimerez ce livre

Actuellement, il n'y a pas de discussions au sujet de ce livre.

» Voir aussi la mention 1

4 sur 4
I’m too shocked for words. Practically. None of my goodread friends has read any Feiffer???! Unbelievable. Don’t you all know that this Pulitzer prize winning, Academy award winning cartoonist is the daddy of modern humour in the US? From Feiffer comes Trudeau, from Feiffer comes Seinfeld, it is that wide-ranging. It was Feiffer who took the neuroses he saw in society and turned them into ‘Sick, sick, sick’ the name of his cartoon strip. It was Feiffer who tried to show white liberal America what it was:


Baby boomers had a habit of falling in love with satirists a few years older than themselves who disliked the counter-culture. When Woody Allen poked fun at “Just Like a Woman” in Annie Hall his audience forgot they loved Bob Dylan for a few moments. Robert Crumb preferred quiet blues to rock n’ roll though he is most famous for his cover of Big Brother and the Holding Company’s Cheap Thrills. Jules Feiffer was of a similar make, but his satire went well beyond a dislike for Dylan. He was deeply critical of the sexual revolution well before it began in strips he wrote for the Village Voice in ’50s and, when it was well underway, in his screenplay for Mike Nichols’s Carnal Knowledge (1971). He spent more energy attacking his white liberal neighbors for their complacency during the civil rights movement than Southern bigots for their brutality. He was terrified of the bomb. Stanley Kubrick in Dr. Strangelove saved his cruelest jokes for George C. Scott’s psychopathic General Buck Turgidson or Peter Sellars’s neutered president. But Feiffer, in his comic story “Boom!” (1959), focused as much on a populace that was disturbingly complicit in ensuring its own nuclear annihilation as on the demons with power. (Paul Morton, bookslut)



He saw the sexual ‘revolution’ as the vehicle for the continued sexual exploitation of woman…as indeed it was.

Interalia he makes an indirect observation about some of the major liberal US magazines attempts to interfere with the artist’s free expression. From Paul Morton’s interview with him:


“The Lonely Machine” was published in Playboy. But you were so against everything that Hugh Hefner stood for in that magazine.
Well, apparently. But Hefner was terrific about it. [He didn’t:] try to shape me to the demands of his publication as every publication except for the Voice generally did. Whether you were working for Esquire or Harper’s or the Atlantic or the New Yorker they wanted you to be like them, with their sensibility. Hefner, when he sent me back notes, he sent me back richly-detailed notes, panel-by-panel breakdowns of what he liked and what he didn’t like. And it was never to change my point-of-view to his or to the magazine’s. But it was to make my argument stronger by strengthening what he thought was a weakness. And in many cases he was right.

I can only assume, my goodreads friends, that you must surely in your life sometime have seen Feiffer without even knowing: if not Carnal Knowledge then Little Murders starring Elliot Gould, Altman’s Popeye for which he wrote the screenplay or Kill Bill 2 where I gather Tarantino steals some of his thoughts on Superheroes.

His cartoons are timeless and insofar as liberal first world complacency (I don’t see that the US should shoulder all the guilt) needs to be relentlessly criticised, this applies even to his political cartoons. Still, it is his social observations that I have picked for your perusal here.

The cool people:






Conformity in rebellion:





Mother:





The illusion of freedom:



Therapy:



Oh and I love this:



You'll find his books for practically nothing at your local secondhand bookshop (that is, if you still have one....I can't speak for the Oxfam monster) as he is evidently completely unfashionable although timeless. A peculiar contradiction. Get one. PLEASE!!!!!

( )
  bringbackbooks | Jun 16, 2020 |
I’m too shocked for words. Practically. None of my goodread friends has read any Feiffer???! Unbelievable. Don’t you all know that this Pulitzer prize winning, Academy award winning cartoonist is the daddy of modern humour in the US? From Feiffer comes Trudeau, from Feiffer comes Seinfeld, it is that wide-ranging. It was Feiffer who took the neuroses he saw in society and turned them into ‘Sick, sick, sick’ the name of his cartoon strip. It was Feiffer who tried to show white liberal America what it was:


Baby boomers had a habit of falling in love with satirists a few years older than themselves who disliked the counter-culture. When Woody Allen poked fun at “Just Like a Woman” in Annie Hall his audience forgot they loved Bob Dylan for a few moments. Robert Crumb preferred quiet blues to rock n’ roll though he is most famous for his cover of Big Brother and the Holding Company’s Cheap Thrills. Jules Feiffer was of a similar make, but his satire went well beyond a dislike for Dylan. He was deeply critical of the sexual revolution well before it began in strips he wrote for the Village Voice in ’50s and, when it was well underway, in his screenplay for Mike Nichols’s Carnal Knowledge (1971). He spent more energy attacking his white liberal neighbors for their complacency during the civil rights movement than Southern bigots for their brutality. He was terrified of the bomb. Stanley Kubrick in Dr. Strangelove saved his cruelest jokes for George C. Scott’s psychopathic General Buck Turgidson or Peter Sellars’s neutered president. But Feiffer, in his comic story “Boom!” (1959), focused as much on a populace that was disturbingly complicit in ensuring its own nuclear annihilation as on the demons with power. (Paul Morton, bookslut)



He saw the sexual ‘revolution’ as the vehicle for the continued sexual exploitation of woman…as indeed it was.

Interalia he makes an indirect observation about some of the major liberal US magazines attempts to interfere with the artist’s free expression. From Paul Morton’s interview with him:


“The Lonely Machine” was published in Playboy. But you were so against everything that Hugh Hefner stood for in that magazine.
Well, apparently. But Hefner was terrific about it. [He didn’t:] try to shape me to the demands of his publication as every publication except for the Voice generally did. Whether you were working for Esquire or Harper’s or the Atlantic or the New Yorker they wanted you to be like them, with their sensibility. Hefner, when he sent me back notes, he sent me back richly-detailed notes, panel-by-panel breakdowns of what he liked and what he didn’t like. And it was never to change my point-of-view to his or to the magazine’s. But it was to make my argument stronger by strengthening what he thought was a weakness. And in many cases he was right.

I can only assume, my goodreads friends, that you must surely in your life sometime have seen Feiffer without even knowing: if not Carnal Knowledge then Little Murders starring Elliot Gould, Altman’s Popeye for which he wrote the screenplay or Kill Bill 2 where I gather Tarantino steals some of his thoughts on Superheroes.

His cartoons are timeless and insofar as liberal first world complacency (I don’t see that the US should shoulder all the guilt) needs to be relentlessly criticised, this applies even to his political cartoons. Still, it is his social observations that I have picked for your perusal here.

The cool people:






Conformity in rebellion:





Mother:





The illusion of freedom:



Therapy:



Oh and I love this:



You'll find his books for practically nothing at your local secondhand bookshop (that is, if you still have one....I can't speak for the Oxfam monster) as he is evidently completely unfashionable although timeless. A peculiar contradiction. Get one. PLEASE!!!!!

( )
  bringbackbooks | Jun 16, 2020 |
A classic of neurotic humor. Feiffer' characters are the everyperson of early 60's America with all of their fears and desires. I have read these books over and over. I have even memorized my favorite strips that become the parables of life in America. Reading them now is a time trip that I still find entertaining. Anybody under 30 can get a better understanding of the boomer generation through these pages. And they are all still very funny. ( )
  wildbill | Aug 13, 2007 |
Early cartoons by the unique Jules Feiffer. I think I like the earliest ones best; they're almost nostalgic. ( )
  burnit99 | Jan 15, 2007 |
4 sur 4
aucune critique | ajouter une critique

» Ajouter d'autres auteur(e)s

Nom de l'auteurRôleType d'auteurŒuvre ?Statut
Feiffer, JulesAuteurauteur principaltoutes les éditionsconfirmé
Tynan, KennethIntroductionauteur secondairequelques éditionsconfirmé
Vous devez vous identifier pour modifier le Partage des connaissances.
Pour plus d'aide, voir la page Aide sur le Partage des connaissances [en anglais].
Titre canonique
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
Titre original
Titres alternatifs
Date de première publication
Personnes ou personnages
Lieux importants
Évènements importants
Films connexes
Épigraphe
Dédicace
Premiers mots
Citations
Derniers mots
Notice de désambigüisation
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
Not to be confused with "Feiffer: The Collected Works, Volume 3; Sick, Sick, Sick" published by Fantagraphics in 1991, which can be found here: https://www.librarything.com/work/2739...
Directeur de publication
Courtes éloges de critiques
Langue d'origine
DDC/MDS canonique
LCC canonique

Références à cette œuvre sur des ressources externes.

Wikipédia en anglais

Aucun

Aucune description trouvée dans une bibliothèque

Description du livre
Résumé sous forme de haïku

Discussion en cours

Aucun

Couvertures populaires

Vos raccourcis

Évaluation

Moyenne: (4.5)
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4 3
4.5 1
5 3

Est-ce vous ?

Devenez un(e) auteur LibraryThing.

 

À propos | Contact | LibraryThing.com | Respect de la vie privée et règles d'utilisation | Aide/FAQ | Blog | Boutique | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliothèques historiques | Critiques en avant-première | Partage des connaissances | 206,504,189 livres! | Barre supérieure: Toujours visible