Cliquer sur une vignette pour aller sur Google Books.
Chargement... How to Be an Atheist: Why Many Skeptics Aren't Skeptical Enoughpar Mitch Stokes
Aucun Chargement...
Inscrivez-vous à LibraryThing pour découvrir si vous aimerez ce livre Actuellement, il n'y a pas de discussions au sujet de ce livre. Mitch's goal in this book is to show Atheists, sceptics are not consistent or skeptical enough, I think he has given a good base for it. Personally, I think Atheists are good people, some are really loving but I am not interested in that, but more on the system of beliefs when challenged. If you are an Atheist, be a consistent one, and you'll find areas in this book, where Mitch says, it can't stand firmly. Lastly, Mitch ends with, Be it, what's the point? He covers a wide array of subjects on Scientific methods. Most of the topics are familiar to whoever is into Christian Philosophy. I learnt more on, differences on history of science from Aristotle and Newton. This really piques my interest more on him, I will read him seriously. He clearly explains the differences in science like instrumentalism, empiricism and how it is an underlying epistemology. I would recommend all scientists to learn more history and philosophy, I think sometimes our pride in knowledge, methods of science leads us to make grand claims like God is dead, we don't need God, God is merely a hypothesis. Mitch shows how we are not even close in understanding a lot of things about reality, we are not skeptical enough in science. Overall, It's a great introduction book to those who are into Atheism, Christianity, Philosophy. aucune critique | ajouter une critique
Challenging atheists to be more skeptical about their own worldview, this book by an accomplished philosopher shows how Christianity offers the best explanation for the world, humanity, and morality. Aucune description trouvée dans une bibliothèque |
Discussion en coursAucun
Google Books — Chargement... GenresClassification décimale de Melvil (CDD)239Religions Christian doctrinal theology Apologetics + Evidences + PolemicsClassification de la Bibliothèque du CongrèsÉvaluationMoyenne:
Est-ce vous ?Devenez un(e) auteur LibraryThing. |
Personally, I think Atheists are good people, some are really loving but I am not interested in that, but more on the system of beliefs when challenged.
If you are an Atheist, be a consistent one, and you'll find areas in this book, where Mitch says, it can't stand firmly. Lastly, Mitch ends with, Be it, what's the point?
He covers a wide array of subjects on Scientific methods. Most of the topics are familiar to whoever is into Christian Philosophy. I learnt more on, differences on history of science from Aristotle and Newton. This really piques my interest more on him, I will read him seriously.
He clearly explains the differences in science like instrumentalism, empiricism and how it is an underlying epistemology. I would recommend all scientists to learn more history and philosophy, I think sometimes our pride in knowledge, methods of science leads us to make grand claims like
God is dead, we don't need God, God is merely a hypothesis.
Mitch shows how we are not even close in understanding a lot of things about reality, we are not skeptical enough in science.
Overall, It's a great introduction book to those who are into Atheism, Christianity, Philosophy.
( )