AccueilGroupesDiscussionsPlusTendances
Site de recherche
Ce site utilise des cookies pour fournir nos services, optimiser les performances, pour les analyses, et (si vous n'êtes pas connecté) pour les publicités. En utilisant Librarything, vous reconnaissez avoir lu et compris nos conditions générales d'utilisation et de services. Votre utilisation du site et de ses services vaut acceptation de ces conditions et termes.

Résultats trouvés sur Google Books

Cliquer sur une vignette pour aller sur Google Books.

Chargement...

In Defence of the Terror: Liberty or Death in the French Revolution (2003)

par Sophie Wahnich

Autres auteurs: Voir la section autres auteur(e)s.

MembresCritiquesPopularitéÉvaluation moyenneMentions
992276,629 (3.08)1
For two hundred years after the French Revolution, the Republican tradition celebrated the execution of princes and aristocrats, defending the Terror that the Revolution inflicted upon on its enemies. But recent decades have brought a marked change in sensibility. The Revolution is no longer judged in terms of historical necessity but rather by "timeless" standards of morality. In this succinct essay, Sophie Wahnich explains how, contrary to prevailing interpretations, the institution of Terror sought to put a brake on legitimate popular violence--in Danton's words, to "be terrible so as to spare the people the need to be so"--and was subsequently subsumed in a logic of war. The Terror was "a process welded to a regime of popular sovereignty, the only alternatives being to defeat tyranny or die for liberty."… (plus d'informations)
Aucun
Chargement...

Inscrivez-vous à LibraryThing pour découvrir si vous aimerez ce livre

Actuellement, il n'y a pas de discussions au sujet de ce livre.

» Voir aussi la mention 1

2 sur 2
Mixed bag. The main point is interesting and she touches on important ideas with regards to emotion, what vengeance means and differing contexts of terror. It doesn't really delve into it but it's a good starting point and I'd be interested in further works looking at these ideas. I'd probably give it a 3, but it's kind of ruined by poor editing and translation.

Some passages are frustrating and I had to read over and over to understand - the English isn't always idiomatic and some phrases are rendered in a weird way. A few of the quotes from other philosophers are impossible to understand so I gave up - I've read them over and over and over and not had a clue what they're saying. It's especially frustrating because the terms used aren't hard, they're just put together in baffling ways. It uses a few French terms consistently but never provides a definition. The book benefits from some knowledge of the figures and events of the French Revolution which isn't provided - I know the basics but not what every figure mentioned did. I realised after a bit I was clearly not the original audience for the book, but it's not that I'm missing major background, just useful facts. It'd have been better if Verso had focused on stuff like this, instead of the pretty ridiculous introduction from Zizek (300 is a good movie and not a racist caricature if you make some highly unlikely assumptions. Whatever dude, you're talking bollocks). In general, the book was tough to read. Some parts were ok but you could end up on a nearly unintelligible paragraph pretty often. I feel like I completely missed out on what several key concepts mean. Overall, it's an interesting work seriously marred by the pretty poor work by the folks at Verso. A great shame.

As an aside, One of the things which stands out the most here is the absurd and hideous attacks on the French Revolution from mainstream figures. Hannah Arendt's claims about things "founded on pity" as attacks on any attempt at equality - she makes Hayek style claims about mediocrity and how horrible equality is - are almost unbelievable in their contempt for the working class.

( )
  tombomp | Oct 31, 2023 |
Excellent essay on the Terror and on revolutionary violence. Not for those unfamiliar with the Revolution and a bit short in relation with the complexity of the subject. ( )
2 voter julesbe | Jan 26, 2014 |
2 sur 2
aucune critique | ajouter une critique

» Ajouter d'autres auteur(e)s (2 possibles)

Nom de l'auteurRôleType d'auteurŒuvre ?Statut
Sophie Wahnichauteur principaltoutes les éditionscalculé
Žižek, SlavojAvant-proposauteur secondairequelques éditionsconfirmé
Fernbach, DavidTraducteurauteur secondairequelques éditionsconfirmé

Appartient à la série éditoriale

Vous devez vous identifier pour modifier le Partage des connaissances.
Pour plus d'aide, voir la page Aide sur le Partage des connaissances [en anglais].
Titre canonique
Titre original
Titres alternatifs
Date de première publication
Personnes ou personnages
Lieux importants
Évènements importants
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
Films connexes
Épigraphe
Dédicace
Premiers mots
Citations
Derniers mots
Notice de désambigüisation
Directeur de publication
Courtes éloges de critiques
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
Langue d'origine
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
DDC/MDS canonique
LCC canonique

Références à cette œuvre sur des ressources externes.

Wikipédia en anglais

Aucun

For two hundred years after the French Revolution, the Republican tradition celebrated the execution of princes and aristocrats, defending the Terror that the Revolution inflicted upon on its enemies. But recent decades have brought a marked change in sensibility. The Revolution is no longer judged in terms of historical necessity but rather by "timeless" standards of morality. In this succinct essay, Sophie Wahnich explains how, contrary to prevailing interpretations, the institution of Terror sought to put a brake on legitimate popular violence--in Danton's words, to "be terrible so as to spare the people the need to be so"--and was subsequently subsumed in a logic of war. The Terror was "a process welded to a regime of popular sovereignty, the only alternatives being to defeat tyranny or die for liberty."

Aucune description trouvée dans une bibliothèque

Description du livre
Résumé sous forme de haïku

Discussion en cours

Aucun

Couvertures populaires

Vos raccourcis

Évaluation

Moyenne: (3.08)
0.5
1
1.5
2 2
2.5
3 1
3.5 1
4 2
4.5
5

Est-ce vous ?

Devenez un(e) auteur LibraryThing.

 

À propos | Contact | LibraryThing.com | Respect de la vie privée et règles d'utilisation | Aide/FAQ | Blog | Boutique | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliothèques historiques | Critiques en avant-première | Partage des connaissances | 206,555,149 livres! | Barre supérieure: Toujours visible