Sidney G. Firman
Auteur de The Winston readers: Second reader
A propos de l'auteur
Œuvres de Sidney G. Firman
The Winston Readers Fourth Reader 4 exemplaires
The Winston Readers First Reader 4 exemplaires
The Winston Companion Readers Primer 3 exemplaires
The Winston Readers Third Reader 2 exemplaires
The New Winston Third Reader 1 exemplaire
The New Winston Primer and First Reader 1 exemplaire
New Winston Second Reader, the 1 exemplaire
The Winston Readers Second Reader 1 exemplaire
The New Winston First Reader 1 exemplaire
The Winston companion readers 1 exemplaire
Étiqueté
Partage des connaissances
- Date de naissance
- 1868
- Date de décès
- 20th Century
- Sexe
- male
Membres
Critiques
Vous aimerez peut-être aussi
Auteurs associés
Statistiques
- Œuvres
- 20
- Membres
- 62
- Popularité
- #271,094
- Évaluation
- 3.5
- Critiques
- 2
- ISBN
- 1
Published in 1929, this telling of the story of Reynard the Fox was probably my least favorite, of any of the many ones I read during the course of my research for my masters dissertation, which examined three centuries of Reynard retellings for children in the Anglophone world. I found the text itself stilted, and sometimes vaguely absurd. The ending - "Day after day Reynard grew worse and worse. At last he died, but just before he died he said he was sorry he had been such a bad fox. He hoped his children would grow up to be good foxes" - struck me as unintentionally amusing, with its stiff and cliched moralizing, and its final illustrations of the fox's tombstone. Despite my personal indifference to it, the book was still quite interesting, chiefly because of that altered ending, and what it potentially says about expectations of children's books in the USA in the 1920s. The author claims in his introduction that the fox's eventual triumph is "out of keeping with present-day standards of morality," and that he must therefore change it. Based upon my research, it would seem that early 20th-century American educators struggled, much as their British counterparts did in the Victorian period, with the essential amorality of this story, and its vulpine hero. Leaving aside its interest as a historical record of changing ideas about morality in stories for children, I'm not sure this one has strong appeal. Recommended chiefly to determined Reynard fans, or to fans of Frederick Richardson, who contributed the illustrations.… (plus d'informations)