Cliquer sur une vignette pour aller sur Google Books.
Chargement... Wider den Methodenzwang. (édition 2001)par Paul Feyerabend
Information sur l'oeuvreContre la méthode par Paul Feyerabend
Filosofía - Clásicos (200) Chargement...
Inscrivez-vous à LibraryThing pour découvrir si vous aimerez ce livre Actuellement, il n'y a pas de discussions au sujet de ce livre. A rare philosophical position that real science can (and does) live up to: a collection of techniques, motivations, social contexts without obvious analytical hierarchy. ( ) A classic of the Philosophy of Science which challenges the idea that scientific progress and discovery are based on methodical investigation and unbroken chains of logic - the setting up of an hypothesis and systematic attempts at knocking it down with evidence. Rather, he shows that many breakthroughs are made often as much by chance or accident, counter-logical leaps, trial and error, the creative subconscious, together with a whole assortment of other non-methodical forces (though for all that, often underpinned nonetheless variously by genius, insight, persistence, ambition, and verification). A number of examples and arguments from the work of Gallileo, as well as other scientists support the claims of this "Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge" over the work of Popper and those who give a more staid account of the scientific enterprise. Originally written to be a dialogue with another piece proposing counter-arguments from his sparring-partner Imre Lakatos, which was not produced due to his untimely death (Letters between them have however been published elsewhere). It is difficult to read in places, but worth the effort. Recommended for anyone with an interest in the philosophy of science, or who works in science. Anything Goes. In many ways, this is quite a magnificent book. It is not an easy read, and in the next few days I will write a more detailed review. It is not an easy book to read, and there were times when I wondered if he would ever move beyond Aristotle and Galileo. However, once you get into the second half of the book, Paul Feyerabend started to pull all the threads together. While he did not examine how the process has worked in the 20th century, and this is a shame, he demonstrated how scientific progress is not always as methodical as it seems to be! At the end, he spelled out some of his own beliefs, and this raised the book to a higher dimension than I had initially thought possible. It is not a book for the faint of heart but stay with it and you will be rewarded. aucune critique | ajouter une critique
Appartient à la série éditoriale
Passionné et provocant, ce plaidoyer pour un savoir libertaire, contre tout carcan méthodologique, se fonde sur une analyse minutieuse des coups de force qui ont fondé l’évolution de la science. Dévoilant les ruses de l’histoire des sciences, critiquant le dogmatisme caché des épistémologies modernes, Feyerabend renouvelle avec véhémence et humour le débat sur la raison.« Esquisse d’une théorie anarchiste de la connaissance », ce livre est désormais un classique de la philosophie des sciences. Aucune description trouvée dans une bibliothèque |
Discussion en coursAucunCouvertures populaires
Google Books — Chargement... GenresClassification décimale de Melvil (CDD)501Natural sciences and mathematics General Science Philosophy and theoryClassification de la Bibliothèque du CongrèsÉvaluationMoyenne:
Est-ce vous ?Devenez un(e) auteur LibraryThing. |