The first realization when reading this book is that David Dark presents an alternative meaning of apocalyptic literature. Apocalyptic in this case does not necessarily mean books that represent the end of the world. Instead it represents works (books, movies, music) and ideas that deconstruct and tear down our perceptions of the society (the machine) in which we live, so that we can reach a greater and deeper understanding of our self and the world, thus breaking free in a greater spiritual and emotional awareness.

He suggests that as well as the Revelations of the Bible, the literature of Flannery O'Connor, the music of Radiohead and Beck, the episodes of the Simpsons, and the movies of the Coen brothers all represent this kind of apocalyptic questioning. He says the works of the artists here mentioned represent versions of our reality that can seem mocking or bleak, but that really represent a form of hope and salvation for those who are willing to push past the norms as society insists we perceive them, in order to be jolted awake.

I think Dark has some very interesting points to make throughout the book, however, I couldn't quite help but feel that there was some sort of a disconnect in his logic. The redefining of apocalyptic, for one, is difficult to take in, and creates a confusing form of terminology to work around.

I'm really torn on this one, because I did enjoy reading it for the most part. The chapters on the Coen brothers films especially rang true for me. However, I keep coming back to it, because I'm not quite comfortable with it as a whole. There's something that bothers me about it on a fundamental level, and it's hard for me to name.

The rest of my thoughts on this book are posted to my blog: http://blythe025.livejournal.com/238943.html ( )