AccueilGroupesDiscussionsPlusTendances
Site de recherche
Ce site utilise des cookies pour fournir nos services, optimiser les performances, pour les analyses, et (si vous n'êtes pas connecté) pour les publicités. En utilisant Librarything, vous reconnaissez avoir lu et compris nos conditions générales d'utilisation et de services. Votre utilisation du site et de ses services vaut acceptation de ces conditions et termes.

Résultats trouvés sur Google Books

Cliquer sur une vignette pour aller sur Google Books.

Chargement...

Civil Disobedience/The Liberator

par Henry David Thoreau, William Lloyd Gaarrison

MembresCritiquesPopularitéÉvaluation moyenneDiscussions
1611,303,562 (4.5)Aucun
Philosophy. Nonfiction. HTML:

Civil Disobedience discusses Thoreau's arguments for civil disobedience-the deliberate violation of laws for reasons of conscience. Thoreau's concept is based on the belief that no law should command blind obedience, and that noncooperation with unjust laws is both morally correct and socially beneficial.

The Liberator was a leading voice for abolitionism in the nineteenth century. Abolitionism called for the immediate emancipation of slaves, based on the principle that individuals own their bodies, labor, and the fruits of their labor. Abolitionists vigorously opposed gradualists, who called for phasing out slavery over a long period of time; they also opposed colonizationists, who wished to relocate former slaves in another country.

.
… (plus d'informations)
Aucun
Chargement...

Inscrivez-vous à LibraryThing pour découvrir si vous aimerez ce livre

Actuellement, il n'y a pas de discussions au sujet de ce livre.

In these essays, Wendy McElroy provides a concise but excellent commentary on these important works of political thought (in this series edited by George H. Smith).

"I have need to be all on fire, for I have mountains of ice about me to melt." -- William Lloyd Garrison

"I am aware that many object to the severity of my language; but is there not cause for severity? I will be as harsh as truth, and as uncompromising as justice. On this subject, I do not wish to think, or to speak, or write, with moderation. No! no! Tell a man whose house is on fire to give a moderate alarm; tell him to moderately rescue his wife from the hands of the ravisher; tell the mother to gradually extricate her babe from the fire into which it has fallen; -- but urge me not to use moderation in a cause like the present. I am in earnest -- I will not equivocate -- I will not excuse -- I will not retreat a single inch -- AND I WILL BE HEARD."

So wrote Garrison in the inaugural issue of The Liberator. Clearly, this was a man who was not afraid to speak his mind, even in criticizing his fellow abolitionists when he felt they compromised the cause: "The public shall not be imposed upon and men and things shall be called by their true names. I retract nothing. I blot out nothing. My language is exactly such as suits me. It will displease many I know. To displease them is my intention."

And he was subject to some harsh criticism by them in turn. In a piece entitled "How to Make a Pope", for example, William Goodell wrote of him, "Take an ardent and strong-minded leader in a good but hated cause, place him in the fires of persecution, and surround him with devoted and generous friends. Just in proportion to the frequency of his proving himself in the right, when almost everybody said he was wrong, will the conviction fasten upon his admirers that he is infallible. Almost of necessity, the same idea will insinuate itself imperceptibly yet firmly into his bosom. He soon shows that he expects to be implicitly followed, and his expectations realized."

At the same time, however, he recognized the necessity of working with such people to achieve common goals. In telling the story of The Liberator, McElroy tells the story of Garrison the man and of the abolitionist movement.

---

"There will never be a really free and enlightened State until the State comes to recognize the individual as a higher and independent power, from which all its own power and authority are derived, and treats him accordingly."

So concluded Henry David Thoreau in his seminal essay, "Civil Disobedience". McElroy's treatment places the work in the broader context of Thoreau's life and thought, showing how he did not think civil disobedience was a duty (as the essay is sometimes misleadingly titled)---that one's primary concern should be to live his own life and pursue his own values---but that one does have a duty not to support evil in any way. ( )
  AshRyan | Mar 5, 2012 |
aucune critique | ajouter une critique

» Ajouter d'autres auteur(e)s (3 possibles)

Nom de l'auteurRôleType d'auteurŒuvre ?Statut
Henry David Thoreauauteur principaltoutes les éditionscalculé
Gaarrison, William Lloydauteur principaltoutes les éditionsconfirmé
Vous devez vous identifier pour modifier le Partage des connaissances.
Pour plus d'aide, voir la page Aide sur le Partage des connaissances [en anglais].
Titre canonique
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
Titre original
Titres alternatifs
Date de première publication
Personnes ou personnages
Lieux importants
Évènements importants
Films connexes
Épigraphe
Dédicace
Premiers mots
Citations
Derniers mots
Notice de désambigüisation
Directeur de publication
Courtes éloges de critiques
Langue d'origine
DDC/MDS canonique
LCC canonique

Références à cette œuvre sur des ressources externes.

Wikipédia en anglais

Aucun

Philosophy. Nonfiction. HTML:

Civil Disobedience discusses Thoreau's arguments for civil disobedience-the deliberate violation of laws for reasons of conscience. Thoreau's concept is based on the belief that no law should command blind obedience, and that noncooperation with unjust laws is both morally correct and socially beneficial.

The Liberator was a leading voice for abolitionism in the nineteenth century. Abolitionism called for the immediate emancipation of slaves, based on the principle that individuals own their bodies, labor, and the fruits of their labor. Abolitionists vigorously opposed gradualists, who called for phasing out slavery over a long period of time; they also opposed colonizationists, who wished to relocate former slaves in another country.

.

Aucune description trouvée dans une bibliothèque

Description du livre
Résumé sous forme de haïku

Discussion en cours

Aucun

Couvertures populaires

Vos raccourcis

Évaluation

Moyenne: (4.5)
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5 1
5

Est-ce vous ?

Devenez un(e) auteur LibraryThing.

 

À propos | Contact | LibraryThing.com | Respect de la vie privée et règles d'utilisation | Aide/FAQ | Blog | Boutique | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliothèques historiques | Critiques en avant-première | Partage des connaissances | 204,763,959 livres! | Barre supérieure: Toujours visible