Cliquer sur une vignette pour aller sur Google Books.
Chargement... Revolt in 2100 (original 1953; édition 1986)par Robert Heinlein (Auteur)
Information sur l'oeuvreRévolte en 2100 par Robert A. Heinlein (1953)
Chargement...
Inscrivez-vous à LibraryThing pour découvrir si vous aimerez ce livre Actuellement, il n'y a pas de discussions au sujet de ce livre. A bit weird, and sort of sexist, but a good story...and a couple of decent ones. ( ) Revolt in 2100 is another installment in Heinlein's Future History arc. Several major figures in that arc feature prominently here, and it takes place some time after the rise of the ayatollahs foretold in Stranger in a Strange Land. We get considerably more context for Scudder, and the origins of Libby in these three interconnected stories. This is about the height, and fall, of the united states theocracy (that in these times feels increasingly likely). 2100 is a bit of a melange...Heinlein's future history world and timeline building is at the forefront, but we get a taste of the military science fiction that Starship Troopers is known for and the social commentary and social engineering some of his later works like Stranger are known for. As with some other early works, there is also more contradiction in his themes and social commentary than one might be used to with Heinlein. Its also easy to overlook if one approaches this expecting the typical themes that turn modern readers off Heinlein. Though religious dictators are presented in a (deserving) negative light and religion overall as hypocritical and unnecessary, several religious groups (notably the Mormons) are instrumental in overthrowing them and presented as quite reasonable folk. Similarly, the main organized resistance seems to all be part of an only loosely disguised version of the Freemason's, who are famously religious in origin and practices. As usual, like Spinrad says, any Heinlein is good scifi and worth a read. However, I think for the modern critical reader there is a special wealth of things to contemplate is we can approach these early works with an open mind. I like most Heinlein that I've read, but I just felt this book dragged, based upon the first section, a novella I attempted to read. I think it would have been better if it had been edited down into a short story. Since I didn't finish the book I won't rate it, but based upon the first 100 or so pages, I'd give it 2 stars. A collection of three stories (one novella, two long short stories) with sort of the same theme but standing independently. Some of Heinlein's lesser-read books, but still great. First, a religious cult (Falwell-style) takes over the US and an exploration of the lives of good people living within it (spoiler: they act like Heinleinian heroes...). Basically "Handmaid's Tale" by Heinlein. Second, an exploration of "the paradox of tolerance" in a society with perfect government. Not as fully developed, could have been a great novel too, but a good short story. Third, a shorter story about an exceptional individual in space (probably the weakest of the three, but still a good story). Even the worst Heinlein stories are among the best of science fiction. These definitely aren't his best, but they're pretty good, and based on length, quite worth reading. aucune critique | ajouter une critique
Appartient à la sérieHistoire du futur (Collection #3 (2, 4, 7)) Appartient à la série éditorialeDelta Science Fiction (168) Galaxy Scifi (20) Gallimard, Folio SF (209) Goldmann SF (030) Presses pocket (5076) — 1 plus Est contenu dansContient
The concept of revolution in a future civilization is explored in this novel. Also use: Assignment in Eternity (1987). Aucune description trouvée dans une bibliothèque |
Discussion en coursAucunCouvertures populaires
Google Books — Chargement... GenresClassification décimale de Melvil (CDD)813.54Literature English (North America) American fiction 20th Century 1945-1999Classification de la Bibliothèque du CongrèsÉvaluationMoyenne:
Est-ce vous ?Devenez un(e) auteur LibraryThing. |