Ce site utilise des cookies pour fournir nos services, optimiser les performances, pour les analyses, et (si vous n'êtes pas connecté) pour les publicités. En utilisant Librarything, vous reconnaissez avoir lu et compris nos conditions générales d'utilisation et de services. Votre utilisation du site et de ses services vaut acceptation de ces conditions et termes.
Résultats trouvés sur Google Books
Cliquer sur une vignette pour aller sur Google Books.
This edition of Bram Stoker's late Victorian gothic novel presents the 1897 text along with critical essays that introduce students to Dracula from contemporary gender, psychoanalytic, new historical, and deconstructionist perspectives. An additional essay demonstrates how various critical perspectives can be combined. The text and essays are complemented by contextual documents, introductions (with bibliographies), and a glossary of critical and theoretical terms.… (plus d'informations)
Inscrivez-vous à LibraryThing pour découvrir si vous aimerez ce livre
▾Discussions (À propos des liens)
Actuellement, il n'y a pas de discussions au sujet de ce livre.
▾Critiques des utilisateurs
Astoundingly, I'd never read Dracula before now. I don't think I've even experienced any adaptations all the way through. I knew some things, but didn't even realize that the majority of the novel takes place in England-- I always figured it was all Transylvanian castles.
Anyway, it's great. Dracula is a great villain, especially in the beginning when he's all suave. The characters claim that Dracula acts like an irrational animal, but his plan is actually founded on very rational principles. Even though Dracula isn't really science fiction, it is good speculative fiction in the sense that it starts from the premise of What if vampires were real and had x properties? and then follows through on that with complete rigor. Of course they were undertake this exact plan.
The book is also scarier than any story that depends on you not knowing what a vampire is has any right to be. For every scene where you can't help being amused that a character is astounded Dracula doesn't have a reflection, there's a whole sequence like the crew of the cargo ship being slowly picked off by a hungry Dracula. The The Woman in White-esque epistolary format really helps in this regard, even if it seems a little contrived that Jonathan Harker has so many opportunities to record his thoughts while fleeing for his life. Also great: the whole Transylvanian segment, the use of the phonograph and typewriter, the fact that Mina Harker is the smartest character in the book, and creepy old Renfield. Given how good this reads now, it must have been fantastic to an audience unfamiliar with vampires.
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais.Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
Please keep the Case Studies in Contemporary Criticism edition un-combined from the rest of them - it is significantly different with thorough explanatory annotations and with essays by other authors.
Directeur de publication
Courtes éloges de critiques
Langue d'origine
DDC/MDS canonique
LCC canonique
▾Références
Références à cette œuvre sur des ressources externes.
Wikipédia en anglais
Aucun
▾Descriptions de livres
This edition of Bram Stoker's late Victorian gothic novel presents the 1897 text along with critical essays that introduce students to Dracula from contemporary gender, psychoanalytic, new historical, and deconstructionist perspectives. An additional essay demonstrates how various critical perspectives can be combined. The text and essays are complemented by contextual documents, introductions (with bibliographies), and a glossary of critical and theoretical terms.
▾Descriptions provenant de bibliothèques
Aucune description trouvée dans une bibliothèque
▾Description selon les utilisateurs de LibraryThing
Anyway, it's great. Dracula is a great villain, especially in the beginning when he's all suave. The characters claim that Dracula acts like an irrational animal, but his plan is actually founded on very rational principles. Even though Dracula isn't really science fiction, it is good speculative fiction in the sense that it starts from the premise of What if vampires were real and had x properties? and then follows through on that with complete rigor. Of course they were undertake this exact plan.
The book is also scarier than any story that depends on you not knowing what a vampire is has any right to be. For every scene where you can't help being amused that a character is astounded Dracula doesn't have a reflection, there's a whole sequence like the crew of the cargo ship being slowly picked off by a hungry Dracula. The The Woman in White-esque epistolary format really helps in this regard, even if it seems a little contrived that Jonathan Harker has so many opportunities to record his thoughts while fleeing for his life. Also great: the whole Transylvanian segment, the use of the phonograph and typewriter, the fact that Mina Harker is the smartest character in the book, and creepy old Renfield. Given how good this reads now, it must have been fantastic to an audience unfamiliar with vampires.