Ce site utilise des cookies pour fournir nos services, optimiser les performances, pour les analyses, et (si vous n'êtes pas connecté) pour les publicités. En utilisant Librarything, vous reconnaissez avoir lu et compris nos conditions générales d'utilisation et de services. Votre utilisation du site et de ses services vaut acceptation de ces conditions et termes.
Résultats trouvés sur Google Books
Cliquer sur une vignette pour aller sur Google Books.
A second collection of horror short stories based on the central theme of superstition. The contributors include John Brunner, Neil Gaiman, Garry Kilworth, Stan Nicholls, Charles Grant, Colin Greenland, Adam Corbin Fusco, Kristine Kathryn Rusch, Paul Lewis, Steve Lockley and Yvonne Navarro.
Touch Wood is an anthology about superstition. For those of us on this side of the pond it means the same thing as "knock on wood."
This book was just average-good. There were some problems. First themed anthologies of "all new stories" are a dodgy affair. Do authors submit these or are they personally solicited by the editor? I suspect a lot of the latter occurs with themed anthologies, so you are not necessarily going to get an author's best work. Everyone horror/fantasy writer likes [a:Peter Crowther|38592|Peter Crowther|https://www.goodreads.com/assets/nophoto/user/m_50x66-e89fc14c32a41c0eb4298dfafe929b65.png] so when he asks you to submit something to his new themed anthology, a lot of authors are going to bite, especially the hungrier ones. The author has to tailor the story to the theme so there is already a constraint on inspiration. So we don't get the author's best current stories, we get the best stories the authors could write today focused around superstition.
The second problem is many of the writers here are decidedly second tier. Except for a few, these are not (were not) the lights of their time. Half of these authors I have never seen before and this was published in 1993, so many must have faded away.
So, there are a couple of above average, a bunch of average, and a few well written but virtually plot-less stories. Describing someplace really well and evocatively but having virtually nothing happen in the setting is not a story, it is a drawing. ( )
Références à cette œuvre sur des ressources externes.
Wikipédia en anglais
Aucun
▾Descriptions de livres
A second collection of horror short stories based on the central theme of superstition. The contributors include John Brunner, Neil Gaiman, Garry Kilworth, Stan Nicholls, Charles Grant, Colin Greenland, Adam Corbin Fusco, Kristine Kathryn Rusch, Paul Lewis, Steve Lockley and Yvonne Navarro.
▾Descriptions provenant de bibliothèques
Aucune description trouvée dans une bibliothèque
▾Description selon les utilisateurs de LibraryThing
Google Books — Chargement...
(3)
4
This book was just average-good. There were some problems. First themed anthologies of "all new stories" are a dodgy affair. Do authors submit these or are they personally solicited by the editor? I suspect a lot of the latter occurs with themed anthologies, so you are not necessarily going to get an author's best work. Everyone horror/fantasy writer likes [a:Peter Crowther|38592|Peter Crowther|https://www.goodreads.com/assets/nophoto/user/m_50x66-e89fc14c32a41c0eb4298dfafe929b65.png] so when he asks you to submit something to his new themed anthology, a lot of authors are going to bite, especially the hungrier ones. The author has to tailor the story to the theme so there is already a constraint on inspiration. So we don't get the author's best current stories, we get the best stories the authors could write today focused around superstition.
The second problem is many of the writers here are decidedly second tier. Except for a few, these are not (were not) the lights of their time. Half of these authors I have never seen before and this was published in 1993, so many must have faded away.
So, there are a couple of above average, a bunch of average, and a few well written but virtually plot-less stories. Describing someplace really well and evocatively but having virtually nothing happen in the setting is not a story, it is a drawing. (