AccueilGroupesDiscussionsPlusTendances
Site de recherche
Ce site utilise des cookies pour fournir nos services, optimiser les performances, pour les analyses, et (si vous n'êtes pas connecté) pour les publicités. En utilisant Librarything, vous reconnaissez avoir lu et compris nos conditions générales d'utilisation et de services. Votre utilisation du site et de ses services vaut acceptation de ces conditions et termes.

Résultats trouvés sur Google Books

Cliquer sur une vignette pour aller sur Google Books.

Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War…
Chargement...

Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism (original 2003; édition 2004)

par Ann Coulter

MembresCritiquesPopularitéÉvaluation moyenneMentions
850825,534 (3.37)7
"Liberals' loyalty to the United States is off-limits as a subject of political debate. Why is the relative patriotism of the two parties the only issue that is out of bounds for rational discussion?" In a stunning follow-up to her number one bestseller Slander, leading conservative pundit Ann Coulter contends that liberals have been wrong on every foreign policy issue, from the fight against Communism at home and abroad, the Nixon and the Clinton presidencies, and the struggle with the Soviet empire right up to today's war on terrorism. "Liberals have a preternatural gift for always striking a position on the side of treason," says Coulter. "Everyone says liberals love America, too. No, they don't." From Truman to Kennedy to Carter to Clinton, America has contained, appeased, and retreated, often sacrificing America's best interests and security. With the fate of the world in the balance, liberals should leave the defense of the nation to conservatives. Reexamining the sixty-year history of the Cold War and beyond--including the career of Senator Joseph McCarthy, the Whittaker Chambers-Alger Hiss affair, Ronald Reagan's challenge to Mikhail Gorbachev to "tear down this wall," the Gulf War, and our present war on terrorism--Coulter reveals how liberals have been horribly wrong in all their political analyses and policy prescriptions. McCarthy, exonerated by the Venona Papers if not before, was basically right about Soviet agents working for the U.S. government. Hiss turned out to be a high-ranking Soviet spy (who consulted Roosevelt at Yalta). Reagan, ridiculed throughout his presidency, ended up winning the Cold War. And George W. Bush, also an object of ridicule, has performed exceptionally in responding to America's newest threats at home and abroad. Coulter, who in Slander exposed a liberal bias in today's media, also examines how history, especially in the latter half of the twentieth century, has been written by liberals and, therefore, distorted by their perspective. Far from being irrelevant today, her clearheaded and piercing view of what we've been through informs us perfectly for challenges today and in the future. With Slander, Ann Coulter became the most recognized and talked-about conservative intellectual of the year. Treason, in many ways an even more controversial and prescient book, will ignite impassioned political debate at one of the most crucial moments in our history.… (plus d'informations)
Membre:Franduto
Titre:Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism
Auteurs:Ann Coulter
Info:Three Rivers Press (2004), Edition: 1st Paperback Edition, Paperback, 368 pages
Collections:Votre bibliothèque
Évaluation:
Mots-clés:a5

Information sur l'oeuvre

Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism par Ann Coulter (2003)

Aucun
Chargement...

Inscrivez-vous à LibraryThing pour découvrir si vous aimerez ce livre

Actuellement, il n'y a pas de discussions au sujet de ce livre.

» Voir aussi les 7 mentions

Affichage de 1-5 de 8 (suivant | tout afficher)
I remember reading her impassioned defense of Joseph McCarthy, and it turned me into a liberal again after I was brainwashed by post-9/11 fearmongering. ( )
1 voter TommySalami | Mar 14, 2013 |
Ok, I read this on the recommendation of Colsith, he doesn't know he recommended it, but I happened to agree with the snippet he quoted, so I thought I'd give it a chance.

First problem with the book, it was boring, meaning not terribly interesting to read.

Next problem, Couldter is a very well read, educated person with a big vocabulary. I'm not. I got sick of having to go look up what her words meant.

Problem the third, she is a zealot. I don't like zealots, for any position. George Bush convinced me I wasn't a republican, Ann Coulter convinced me I am not a conservative. Of course I can get over this by watching a Micahel Moore movie or listening to NPR and then I'm sure I'll polarize back to my nice, safe, narrow-minded, comfort zone. She's going to give reactionaries a bad name

Problem #4, she's mean. Hateful, spiteful....this is what I must sound like talking about White Scarves.

Problem #5, she's crazier than a Lemming at mating season , whacked out on crystal meth. "Anyone found (with Muslim writings) that is darker than Donny Osmond should have been locked up after 9-11."

Problem the last, I hate rhetoric, always have.

This is the last paragraph of the book "Americans cannot coomprehend how thier fellow countrymen could not love their country. But the left's anti-Americanism is intrinsic to their entire worldview. Liberals promote the rights of Islamic fanatics for the same reason they promote the rights of adulterers, pornographers, abortionists, criminals and Communists. They instinctively root for anarchy and against civilisation. The inevitable logic of the liberal position is to be for treason."

That was the nicest thing she said in the whole book. I CAN hate the America where being a Muslim, adulterer, pornographer or Communist is a crime. Treason is not to agree with Coulter. Fine no problem; for that matter, you can substitute the word "dissent" for treason, and the book reads the same. Myself, I'll keep using "treason", it has a certain visceral impact, and it sounds sexier. ( )
8 voter Neilsantos | Oct 8, 2010 |
Ann Coulter is a terrifically blunt, expressive, and truthful conservative writer. This book concentrates on the anti-nationalism traits of Democrats within the last century while defending the heart of McCarthyism during the Cold War.
If you are a Democrat reading this book, I suggest you actually think about how politicians within your party screw us all over. This book is full of witty jokes about both Republicans and Democrats. If you are very interested in political history then this is an excellent book to read. ( )
1 voter adriank | Aug 14, 2010 |
Fantastic expose by Ann Coulter on the almost perfectly successful smear campaign against Joseph McCarthy and other conservatives. ( )
  br77rino | Feb 27, 2010 |
Coulter convinced me that liberal Democrats have worked against America's interests during critical times during the past century, sometimes intentionally. She also convinced me that their soft stance on international diplomacy has typically backfired. However, I disagree with her strong stance in support of aggressive action across the world and that people who speak out against it are treasonous (even if accepting a Nobel, as Carter did on that basis). ( )
1 voter jpsnow | May 8, 2008 |
Affichage de 1-5 de 8 (suivant | tout afficher)
aucune critique | ajouter une critique
Vous devez vous identifier pour modifier le Partage des connaissances.
Pour plus d'aide, voir la page Aide sur le Partage des connaissances [en anglais].
Titre canonique
Titre original
Titres alternatifs
Date de première publication
Personnes ou personnages
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
Lieux importants
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
Évènements importants
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
Films connexes
Épigraphe
Dédicace
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
For my father, John V. Coulter
Premiers mots
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
Liberals have a preternatural gift for striking a position on the side of treason. You could be talking about Scrabble and they would instantly leap to the anti-American position. Everyone says liberals love America, too. No they don't. Whenever the nation is under attack, from within or without, liberals side with the enemy. This is their essence. The left's obsession with the crimes of the West and their Rousseauian respect for Third World savages all flow from this subversive goal. If anyone has the gaucherie to point out the left's nearly unblemished record of rooting against America, liberals turn around and scream "McCarthyism!"
Citations
Derniers mots
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
(Cliquez pour voir. Attention : peut vendre la mèche.)
Notice de désambigüisation
Directeur de publication
Courtes éloges de critiques
Langue d'origine
DDC/MDS canonique
LCC canonique

Références à cette œuvre sur des ressources externes.

Wikipédia en anglais (1)

"Liberals' loyalty to the United States is off-limits as a subject of political debate. Why is the relative patriotism of the two parties the only issue that is out of bounds for rational discussion?" In a stunning follow-up to her number one bestseller Slander, leading conservative pundit Ann Coulter contends that liberals have been wrong on every foreign policy issue, from the fight against Communism at home and abroad, the Nixon and the Clinton presidencies, and the struggle with the Soviet empire right up to today's war on terrorism. "Liberals have a preternatural gift for always striking a position on the side of treason," says Coulter. "Everyone says liberals love America, too. No, they don't." From Truman to Kennedy to Carter to Clinton, America has contained, appeased, and retreated, often sacrificing America's best interests and security. With the fate of the world in the balance, liberals should leave the defense of the nation to conservatives. Reexamining the sixty-year history of the Cold War and beyond--including the career of Senator Joseph McCarthy, the Whittaker Chambers-Alger Hiss affair, Ronald Reagan's challenge to Mikhail Gorbachev to "tear down this wall," the Gulf War, and our present war on terrorism--Coulter reveals how liberals have been horribly wrong in all their political analyses and policy prescriptions. McCarthy, exonerated by the Venona Papers if not before, was basically right about Soviet agents working for the U.S. government. Hiss turned out to be a high-ranking Soviet spy (who consulted Roosevelt at Yalta). Reagan, ridiculed throughout his presidency, ended up winning the Cold War. And George W. Bush, also an object of ridicule, has performed exceptionally in responding to America's newest threats at home and abroad. Coulter, who in Slander exposed a liberal bias in today's media, also examines how history, especially in the latter half of the twentieth century, has been written by liberals and, therefore, distorted by their perspective. Far from being irrelevant today, her clearheaded and piercing view of what we've been through informs us perfectly for challenges today and in the future. With Slander, Ann Coulter became the most recognized and talked-about conservative intellectual of the year. Treason, in many ways an even more controversial and prescient book, will ignite impassioned political debate at one of the most crucial moments in our history.

Aucune description trouvée dans une bibliothèque

Description du livre
Résumé sous forme de haïku

Discussion en cours

Aucun

Couvertures populaires

Vos raccourcis

Évaluation

Moyenne: (3.37)
0.5 1
1 13
1.5
2 12
2.5 2
3 29
3.5 4
4 42
4.5 4
5 19

Est-ce vous ?

Devenez un(e) auteur LibraryThing.

 

À propos | Contact | LibraryThing.com | Respect de la vie privée et règles d'utilisation | Aide/FAQ | Blog | Boutique | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliothèques historiques | Critiques en avant-première | Partage des connaissances | 205,091,422 livres! | Barre supérieure: Toujours visible