AccueilGroupesDiscussionsPlusTendances
Site de recherche
Ce site utilise des cookies pour fournir nos services, optimiser les performances, pour les analyses, et (si vous n'êtes pas connecté) pour les publicités. En utilisant Librarything, vous reconnaissez avoir lu et compris nos conditions générales d'utilisation et de services. Votre utilisation du site et de ses services vaut acceptation de ces conditions et termes.

Résultats trouvés sur Google Books

Cliquer sur une vignette pour aller sur Google Books.

Chargement...

The Battle for the Rhine

par Robin Neillands

MembresCritiquesPopularitéÉvaluation moyenneMentions
1172233,117 (3.23)1
Who was really responsible for the failure at Nijmegen, the destruction of the British First Airborne Division at Arnhem, and the failure of Operation Market Garden? Why was Montgomery threatened with the sack when he had just retrieved Bradleyâ??s failure in the Battle of the Bulge? Was General Eisenhowerâ??s command strategy either workable or wise, and did Bradley and Patton undermine it? Even after sixty years, the questions remain. In this account of the 1944 post-Normandy campaign, historian Robin Neillands disentangles events from the media myths that have come to surround them to get to the truth of what really happened. He examines the often difficult relationship between General Eisenhower and British Field Marshal Montgomery. If Eisenhower had taken his advice, would the Allies have made quicker progress? Could the war in Europe have been won in 1944 if the right strategies had been employed? With superb battle narratives and clear analysis of success and failure at every point, Neillands casts a new and informed light on the costly struggle for the… (plus d'informations)
Aucun
Chargement...

Inscrivez-vous à LibraryThing pour découvrir si vous aimerez ce livre

Actuellement, il n'y a pas de discussions au sujet de ce livre.

» Voir aussi la mention 1

2 sur 2
An odd book. Neillands starts out loudly proclaiming to look at things even handedly and unbiasedly ... then promptly proceeds to bag anything the Americans do while lauding any British success and glossing British failures, or blaming them on the US. To be fair, Patton and Bradley deserve a large measure of criticism for actively working against Eisenhowers plan and Allied interests in the Aug-Oct period, but Neillands goes a little far in blaming Eisenhower - rather than Montgomery - for the failure to open Antwerp promptly. Similarly, Browning is simultaneously blamed for allowing the flawed 1st UK A/B LZs at Arnhem, while excused for the same fault at Nijmegan with the 82nd A/B, apparently so that Gavin can be blamed instead.

Overall the book is reasonably well written, although the maps could have been a lot more useful, and the weighting of various campaigns is a little uneven, with the Battle of the Bulge in particular getting comparatively little ink. ( )
1 voter JonSowden | Jul 6, 2010 |
July to December 1944: the Allies had broken out of the Normandy beachhead, the German armies were in full retreat and hastening back toward Germany, with French, British, and American armies in hot pursuit. SHAEF rosily predicted a January collapse, which was spectacularly refuted in the Ardennes. The author is interested in three intertwined issues: Allied strategy for the ground war, Eisenhower’s performance as the ground forces commander, and the various army commanders’ roles in the race for the Rhine. He attempts to correct American historians’ biases, re-examine the actions of the major subordinate commanders (Montgomery, Bradley, and Patton) and discuss the problems that kept the Allies from ending the war in 1944. Evaluations of the characters are balanced; Eisenhower was a fine coalition leader and a mediocre battlefield commander; Montgomery is shown as a solid and experienced commander but a total failure at relationships with the other generals; Patton as reasonably effective in the pursuit but constantly undermining Allied strategy. Neillands is the author of several military history books, including Eighth Army and Bomber War. Might have been better if Neillands had integrated the larger strategic picture, as for instance the firebombing of the German cities, to better describe the context. On the other hand he died shortly after finishing this book, so give him a break. ( )
  edlib | Dec 22, 2006 |
2 sur 2
aucune critique | ajouter une critique
Vous devez vous identifier pour modifier le Partage des connaissances.
Pour plus d'aide, voir la page Aide sur le Partage des connaissances [en anglais].
Titre canonique
Titre original
Titres alternatifs
Date de première publication
Personnes ou personnages
Lieux importants
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
Évènements importants
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
Films connexes
Épigraphe
Dédicace
Premiers mots
Citations
Derniers mots
Notice de désambigüisation
Directeur de publication
Courtes éloges de critiques
Langue d'origine
DDC/MDS canonique
LCC canonique

Références à cette œuvre sur des ressources externes.

Wikipédia en anglais (2)

Who was really responsible for the failure at Nijmegen, the destruction of the British First Airborne Division at Arnhem, and the failure of Operation Market Garden? Why was Montgomery threatened with the sack when he had just retrieved Bradleyâ??s failure in the Battle of the Bulge? Was General Eisenhowerâ??s command strategy either workable or wise, and did Bradley and Patton undermine it? Even after sixty years, the questions remain. In this account of the 1944 post-Normandy campaign, historian Robin Neillands disentangles events from the media myths that have come to surround them to get to the truth of what really happened. He examines the often difficult relationship between General Eisenhower and British Field Marshal Montgomery. If Eisenhower had taken his advice, would the Allies have made quicker progress? Could the war in Europe have been won in 1944 if the right strategies had been employed? With superb battle narratives and clear analysis of success and failure at every point, Neillands casts a new and informed light on the costly struggle for the

Aucune description trouvée dans une bibliothèque

Description du livre
Résumé sous forme de haïku

Discussion en cours

Aucun

Couvertures populaires

Vos raccourcis

Évaluation

Moyenne: (3.23)
0.5
1
1.5
2 2
2.5 2
3 5
3.5
4 5
4.5 1
5

Est-ce vous ?

Devenez un(e) auteur LibraryThing.

 

À propos | Contact | LibraryThing.com | Respect de la vie privée et règles d'utilisation | Aide/FAQ | Blog | Boutique | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliothèques historiques | Critiques en avant-première | Partage des connaissances | 204,712,668 livres! | Barre supérieure: Toujours visible