AccueilGroupesDiscussionsPlusTendances
Site de recherche
Ce site utilise des cookies pour fournir nos services, optimiser les performances, pour les analyses, et (si vous n'êtes pas connecté) pour les publicités. En utilisant Librarything, vous reconnaissez avoir lu et compris nos conditions générales d'utilisation et de services. Votre utilisation du site et de ses services vaut acceptation de ces conditions et termes.

Résultats trouvés sur Google Books

Cliquer sur une vignette pour aller sur Google Books.

The Meaning of Independence: John Adams,…
Chargement...

The Meaning of Independence: John Adams, George Washington, and Thomas Jefferson (Richard Lectures) (édition 2005)

par Edmund S. Morgan (Auteur)

MembresCritiquesPopularitéÉvaluation moyenneDiscussions
1433193,357 (4)Aucun
Americans did not at first cherish the idea of political severance from their mother country. In just a few years, however, they came to desire indepen-dence above all else. What brought about this change of feeling and how did it affect the lives of their citizens? To answer these questions, Edmund S. Morgan looks at three men who may fairly be called the "architects of independence," the first presidents of the United States. Anecdotes from their letters and diaries recapture the sense of close identity many early Americans felt with their country's political struggles. Through this perspective, Morgan examines the growth of independence from its initial declaration and discovers something of its meaning, for three men who responded to its challenge and for the nation that they helped create. The Meaning of Independence, first published in 1976, has become one of the standard short works on the first three presidents of the United States--George Washington, John Adams, and Thomas Jefferson. When the Mount Vernon Ladies' Association and the Organization of American Historians asked 1,500 historians to name the ten best books about George Washington, this book was one of those selected. In this updated edition, the author provides a new preface to address a few remaining concerns he has pondered in the quarter century since first publication. Tag:A classic work on the founding by the author of the bestselling Benjamin Franklin… (plus d'informations)
Membre:mitchplease
Titre:The Meaning of Independence: John Adams, George Washington, and Thomas Jefferson (Richard Lectures)
Auteurs:Edmund S. Morgan (Auteur)
Info:University of Virginia Press (2005), 96 pages
Collections:À lire
Évaluation:
Mots-clés:Aucun

Information sur l'oeuvre

The Meaning of Independence: John Adams, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson par Edmund S. Morgan

Aucun
Chargement...

Inscrivez-vous à LibraryThing pour découvrir si vous aimerez ce livre

Actuellement, il n'y a pas de discussions au sujet de ce livre.

4 sur 4
I think the brevity of the essays work against the purpose of the text. This is a thin volume, so it wouldn't be fair for me to criticize it for a lack of depth. That said, I expected this to be a series of essays that attempted to explain how each of the three founders (Adams, Washington, Jefferson) defined independence. And there is some of this, but I also found much more biography than I expected. And with a volume so thin, any biographical details must of necessity be short and shallow. Still, Morgan does draw out some helpful points.

Adams - Of Adams we learn the least, with more focus on his biography than his philosophy. In the main, we learn that he distrusted political parties and felt that the virtue of the individual was the key to a successfully independent nation: "the ability of the American republic to sustain its independence rested on the ability of its citizens to sustain their virtue" (20).

Washington - We get more of Washington's philosophy, with Morgan setting out two keys to Washington's approach to government: honor and interest. For Washington, "honor required a man to be assiduous and responsible in looking after his interests. But honor also required a man to look beyond his own profit ..." (33). These values were important for individuals and nations, and affected Washington's approach to foreign policy. He felt it was vain to "appeal to the honor of any country against the interests of that country and its people" because such appeals would not hold over time (46). This also implied that America should pursue its own interests, in an honorable fashion, without getting caught up in the interests of other nations, leading to Washington's famous neutrality in foreign relations.

Jefferson – Jefferson—the most controversial of the three, the most hypocritical from a modern perspective—is also the most radical in arguing that the rights of the state outweigh those of the national government and that the rights of the individual outweigh both. For Jefferson, "liberty was always an attribute of the individual, and the state at best a means of securing it” (70). In addition, he believed that "one generation is to another as one independent nation to another" (76), meaning that twenty years was the maximum amount of time that any law or constitution could be considered to have the consent of the people or that any public debt could be contracted. He also sought protection of individual liberty from the influence of the church and protection of national liberty from the burden of debt and foreign obligation. The goal, a government limited enough to provide every possibility of liberty to the individual, but powerful enough to protect that liberty. Though, significantly, Jefferson's conception of the "individual" was confined ideally to well-educated, land-holding farmer/philosophers (which, in modern terms, would translate to "the elite").

Overall, the Jefferson essay makes it worth the read, but even then you'll need to look elsewhere for historical context, nuanced interpretations, or scholarly controversy. ( )
  erichoefler | May 24, 2010 |
Having just finished this brief work by Morgan i concur with the other review but would hesitate to recommend a further expansion unless it were to include some of the lesser lights of the period. My main complaint with this work is the way the story of history continues to be told through the major figures of a period. While this is an excellent work and does branch off from the usual fodder of a biography by giving some intellectual background to a specific subject, I feel time would be better spent after reading this brief work moving on to some colonies general feelings about the revolution or some economic history of the period etc...or even Morgan's work on inventing the people or the rise of the republic ( )
  DavenportsDream | Apr 28, 2009 |
A rightfully excellent work of intellectual history from a recognized expert of the Revolutionary period. Morgan in effect gives us mini-biographies of Adams, Washington, and Jefferson, offering windows into what independence meant to them. A capital work that should have been expanded to include other Founders like Hamilton, Samuel Adams, Henry, Mason, et cetera. ( )
  tuckerresearch | Dec 16, 2006 |
2/13/22
  laplantelibrary | Feb 13, 2023 |
4 sur 4
aucune critique | ajouter une critique
Vous devez vous identifier pour modifier le Partage des connaissances.
Pour plus d'aide, voir la page Aide sur le Partage des connaissances [en anglais].
Titre canonique
Titre original
Titres alternatifs
Date de première publication
Personnes ou personnages
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
Lieux importants
Évènements importants
Films connexes
Épigraphe
Dédicace
Premiers mots
Citations
Derniers mots
Notice de désambigüisation
Directeur de publication
Courtes éloges de critiques
Langue d'origine
DDC/MDS canonique
LCC canonique

Références à cette œuvre sur des ressources externes.

Wikipédia en anglais

Aucun

Americans did not at first cherish the idea of political severance from their mother country. In just a few years, however, they came to desire indepen-dence above all else. What brought about this change of feeling and how did it affect the lives of their citizens? To answer these questions, Edmund S. Morgan looks at three men who may fairly be called the "architects of independence," the first presidents of the United States. Anecdotes from their letters and diaries recapture the sense of close identity many early Americans felt with their country's political struggles. Through this perspective, Morgan examines the growth of independence from its initial declaration and discovers something of its meaning, for three men who responded to its challenge and for the nation that they helped create. The Meaning of Independence, first published in 1976, has become one of the standard short works on the first three presidents of the United States--George Washington, John Adams, and Thomas Jefferson. When the Mount Vernon Ladies' Association and the Organization of American Historians asked 1,500 historians to name the ten best books about George Washington, this book was one of those selected. In this updated edition, the author provides a new preface to address a few remaining concerns he has pondered in the quarter century since first publication. Tag:A classic work on the founding by the author of the bestselling Benjamin Franklin

Aucune description trouvée dans une bibliothèque

Description du livre
Résumé sous forme de haïku

Discussion en cours

Aucun

Couvertures populaires

Vos raccourcis

Évaluation

Moyenne: (4)
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3 3
3.5
4 4
4.5
5 3

Est-ce vous ?

Devenez un(e) auteur LibraryThing.

 

À propos | Contact | LibraryThing.com | Respect de la vie privée et règles d'utilisation | Aide/FAQ | Blog | Boutique | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliothèques historiques | Critiques en avant-première | Partage des connaissances | 206,927,027 livres! | Barre supérieure: Toujours visible