Cliquer sur une vignette pour aller sur Google Books.
Chargement... Le futur passé. Contribution à la sémantique des temps historiques (1979)par Reinhart Koselleck
Aucun Chargement...
Inscrivez-vous à LibraryThing pour découvrir si vous aimerez ce livre Actuellement, il n'y a pas de discussions au sujet de ce livre. aucune critique | ajouter une critique
Appartient à la série éditorialeListes notables
With a new, interpretive introduction by the translator, this revised edition of Koselleck's most acclaimed work is once again available in English. Koselleck explores the concept of historical time by posing the question: What kind of experience is opened up by the emergence of modernity? Koselleck explores the concept of historical time by posing the question: what kind of experience is opened up by the emergence of modernity? Aucune description trouvée dans une bibliothèque |
Discussion en coursAucunCouvertures populaires
Google Books — Chargement... GenresClassification décimale de Melvil (CDD)901History and Geography History Philosophy & theoryClassification de la Bibliothèque du CongrèsÉvaluationMoyenne:
Est-ce vous ?Devenez un(e) auteur LibraryThing. Columbia University PressUne édition de ce livre a été publiée par Columbia University Press. |
The first and last articles in particular are groundbreaking in this respect. In them Koselleck comprehensively outlines his view about the relationship between the space of experience and the horizon of expectation, the first focusing on what has passed, the other on what is to come. According to Koselleck this relationship has fundamentally changed with the breakthrough of modernity, in the period 1750-1850. Where past, present and future up to that point were more or less mixed, the space of experience in modernity was dissociated from and subordinated to the present and especially the future, in function of the concept of 'progress'.
I know, all of that remains fairly abstract, so this is by no means an easy read. There’s some repetition due to the different publication dates of the articles, but through them one can see that Koselleck formulated his theses more precisely, made them more concrete and put them in a broader context. This is history theory at the highest level! My rating is not the full 5 stars, because there are also some slightly lesser contributions, and also contributions that move at such a high philosophical level that they were less useful for me.
For a more elaborate review: see my History-account on Goodreads: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/2449430878 ( )