An interesting read in many ways. Cultural differences, exploitation, religion, violence, mania, passion, its all in there. And, in addition, well written and entertaining. Lots of interesting characters and much to ponder. ( )

In Ciudad Real (dem heutigen San Cristobal de las Casas), der alten Hauptstadt Chiapas' und Hochburg der kreolischen Oberschicht, und dem benachbarten Municipio Chamula, welches hauptsächlich von Totzil-Mayas bewohnt ist, soll eine Landreform durchgeführt werden. Die Gegensätze entfachen schließlich eine Revolte der indigenen Bevölkerung.

Aus dem Kontext des Romans lässt sich erschließen, dass Castellanos den Indio-Aufstand von 1917 im Sinn hatte, wenngleich die Handlung nahezu zeitlos ist: Er erzählt vom ewigen Streben der armen, indigenen Landbevölkerung nach Gleichstellung und Gerechtigkeit. Castellanos garniert die Handlung mit jahrhunderteealten, indianischen Mythen und Riten.

Wirklich lesenswert ist jener Teil des Romans, in dem sich Castellanos auf die Beschreibung der unterschiedlichen Lebensweisen und soziologischen Gegebenheiten in Chiapas am Anfang des 20. Jahrhunderts beschränkt. Dort, wo sie ins Reich der Magie abdriftet oder versucht, ein politisches Statement weiterzugeben, vermisst man echte Tiefe der Handlung. Auch der Indio-Aufstand an sich wird nur in kurzen, mosaikartigen Bildern wiedergegeben, sodass der Leser diesbezüglich letztlich etwas unbefriedigt zurück bleibt. ( )

"OFICIO DE TINIEBLAS", CONSIDERADA UNA OBRA MAESTRA DE LA NARRATIVA LATINOAMERICANA, ESTÁ BASADA EN EL LEVANTAMIENTO DE LOS CHAMULAS DE 1867 A 1870 EN SAN CRISTÓBAL, CHIAPAS, QUE CULMINÓ CON LA CRUCIFIXIÓN DE UNO DE ELLOS AL PROCLAMARLO COMO EL CRISTO INDÍGENA. ROSARIO CASTELLANOS SE SUMERGE EN LA HISTORIA Y SUS PROTAGONISTAS PARA BUSCAR ENTENDER LAS CIRCUNSTANCIAS A UN PUEBLO A TAN DESGARRADOR ACONTECIMIENTO Y LO RECREA EN UN MÉXICO CERCANO: EL DE LA REFORMA AGRARIA DURANTE EL GOBIERNO DE LÁZARO CÁRDENAS.
UNA EXTRAORDINARIA NARRACIÓN QUE RETRATA EN TODA SU CRUDEZA, LA OPRESIÓN DEL MUNDO INDÍGENA, QUE APENAS CONSIGUE SOBREVIVIR A LA POBREZA MIENTRAS ENFRENTA EL MENOSPRECIO Y DESPOJO DE SUS TIERRAS POR PARTE DE LOS BLANCOS LADINOS.

Published in 1962, The book of Lamentations is a fictional story set in the 1930s; it is loosely based on a Mayan uprising that took place in the Mexican state of Chiapas in the mid-19th century.

Even more than a fictionalized account of a true story, the book is a devastating indictment of the Ladino oppression of the native Mayans; the brutal treatment of the Mayans as much less than human beings, the casual, common rape of the Mayan women, the lies by which the Mayans are enlisted into virtual slavery on the large haciendas.

However, Castellanos is unsparing of the Mayans as well, remorselessly describing the passivity, the drunkenness, the superstitions by which, in her eyes, the Mayans buy into their own oppression and continue it from one generation to the next.

The central (historical) act of the story is a horrifying one that, once it takes place, seems inevitable from the remorseless dynamics that drive events.

Although told in the third person from multiple points of view, two people stand out as the major protagonists, one from each culture: Lenoardo Cifuentes, nouveau riche, who desperately wants to be a part of High Society, represented by the old landowning families, of Ciudad Real, and Catalina Díaz Puiljá, an ilol (shaman or seer) of the Chamula tribe of Mayans, who is the most well-developed and the most powerful character in the novel. The beauty of Castellanos’ narrative is that the story can be read on many levels, and one of them is the lengths to which the need for acceptance will drive people. Cifuentes craves acceptance from the Old Families; Catalina, a barren woman, needs the security of acceptance from her tribe. Both as a result lust for power. The outcome is appalling.

Castellanos herself belonged to one of the old landowning families of Chiapas, and had intimate knowledge of that society and its undercurrents. Her ambition was to show both cultures as they really were, not as some romantic idealization, particularly of the Mayans.

The end of the story is heart-breaking, but given the realities, there can be no happy ending. The last word, the last commentary is a tale woven by a Mayan woman, a nana to the daughter of the Cifeuntes household. Caught up in the myth is a sense that there is no salvation possible in the world, struggle as we might against the forces which oppress us. There is just survival, which we achieve by inventing, if we must, myths that allow us to accept our fate. ( )

"Mexican history could be represented by the gradual expansion of a circle: that of the owners of wealth. From the conquistadores to the monks to the Spanish colonists to the criollos, ... there was still a long way to go before that wealth would reach the humble masses of the population. Considerable interests were opposed to the unfolding of this process; thus, every new expansion of the circle had been achieved at the cost of drowning the country in rivers of blood ... " (p. 185)

The Book of Lamentations chronicles the struggle between rural native people, descended from Mayans, in the Mexican state of Chiapas, and the wealthy, land-owning, city-dwelling "Ladino" population. Castellanos fills the story with a myriad of characters representing several factions. The characters' lives intertwine when Fernando Ulloa, a government civil servant, embarks on an initiative to redefine property boundaries and restore land rights to the native people. There are obvious parallels to westward expansion in the United States, and numerous other examples of European conquest and colonization.

Through various female characters, Castellanos also expresses her dissatisfaction with the role of women in Mexican society: "She was one of those women for whom the world, her own destiny and even her personality do not reveal themselves or take on definite shape except through amorous contact with a man." (p. 131) Castellanos herself was quite a pioneer, being the first woman from Chiapas to pursue a career as a writer. The very act of writing was subversive, and for a woman to do so was all the more outrageous.

This was an interesting book for its historical context, about which I knew very little, and for exposure to another country's literature. Unfortunately, the novel's pace ebbs and flows, with only brief periods of intense interest. The sheer number of characters makes for an unnecessarily complicated plot, and no single character was developed fully enough for my liking. ( )