Cliquer sur une vignette pour aller sur Google Books.
|
Chargement... The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies (2007)par Bryan Caplan
   Actuellement, il n'y a pas de discussions au sujet de ce livre.   ) davdittrich | Feb 14, 2023 |  There are two ways to look at Kaplan's work: 1. That this is a cynical work on political game theory that predicts the rise of Trump like figures. 2. That politcal economy, however unseemly, is a fascinating result of the electorate, politicians, media and so on attempting to navigate the fundamental irrational forces at work in democracy. Ultimately, Kaplan's point is often that markets, both economic and behavioural, trump idealogy in terms of what motivates policies. (  ) Kavinay | Jan 2, 2023 | ) marzagao | Jun 1, 2021 | ) octal | Jan 1, 2021 | Caplan delivers spectacularly on the title. Not only is it a rebuttal of the common view of economists that everyone always acts rationally, but it also strongly argues that humans are _particularly bad_ in the political arena. The book persuasively challenges many common criticisms of democracy: that most voters are stupid and only vote in self-interest, that bureaucratic inefficiencies are a bad thing, that politicians are mostly crooked, that low-voter turnout is a bad thing, and that democracies aren't very good at giving the people what they ask for. MY GOOD IS THIS BOOK GOOD. If you accept Caplan's premise, and evidently I do, the consequences he points out are staggering. "Get out and vote" campaigns are actively harmful to society. If you're running for office, you should in fact not keep your campaign promises. It's a delightfully different lens for looking at the world, and one which puts a lot more into perspective than I realized beforehand. ( ) isovector | Dec 13, 2020 | aucune critique | ajouter une critique
Prix et récompenses
The greatest obstacle to sound economic policy is not entrenched special interests or rampant lobbying, but the popular misconceptions, irrational beliefs, and personal biases held by ordinary voters. This is economist Bryan Caplan's sobering assessment in this provocative and eye-opening book. Caplan argues that voters continually elect politicians who either share their biases or else pretend to, resulting in bad policies winning again and again by popular demand. Boldly calling into question our most basic assumptions about American politics, Caplan contends that democracy fails precisely because it does what voters want. Through an analysis of Americans' voting behavior and opinions on a range of economic issues, he makes the convincing case that noneconomists suffer from four prevailing biases: they underestimate the wisdom of the market mechanism, distrust foreigners, undervalue the benefits of conserving labor, and pessimistically believe the economy is going from bad to worse. Caplan lays out several bold ways to make democratic government work better--for example, urging economic educators to focus on correcting popular misconceptions and recommending that democracies do less and let markets take up the slack. The Myth of the Rational Voter takes an unflinching look at how people who vote under the influence of false beliefs ultimately end up with government that delivers lousy results. With the upcoming presidential election season drawing nearer, this thought-provoking book is sure to spark a long-overdue reappraisal of our elective system. Aucune description trouvée dans une bibliothèque |
Discussion en coursAucunCouvertures populaires
 Google Books — Chargement...GenresClassification décimale de Melvil (CDD)320.6Social sciences Political Science Political Science Policy formulationClassification de la Bibliothèque du CongrèsÉvaluationMoyenne: (3.86)
Est-ce vous ?Devenez un(e) auteur LibraryThing. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2